I have changed the name of the rpm names from
e-smith-name.rpm to vineet-name.rpm. After
changing names i also changed the spec files, then i
regenerated the hdlist file.
The installation seems to go smooth, but the
post-install is creating problems. It seems that
perl-Text-Template-1.20 rpm is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[root@sme512 /root]# rpm -Fvh $DB/php-4.1.1-2.i386.rpm \
Retrieving
ftp://ftp.e-smith.org/pub/e-smith/contrib/DanBrown/RPMS/i386/php-4
.1.1-2.i386.rpm
error: cannot open file : No such file or
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 01:59, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Brad Hards wrote:
snip
2. (much more importantly) Don't assume that just because you needed
extra modules with ipchains that you will also need one with iptables.
What (exactly) is it that you think that you need and
On a similar note - we are looking for a backup/recover program
which will provide GUI based single/multiple file handling.
This will be used by a clothing company that handles
theme based clothing, requires up to 5GB backup and
500 -800MB retrive daily.
Yes, I have checked the other lists, but
This looks very good Stephan. I'm wondering if it
wouldn't be more
convenent to create samba share template fragments
for the devices
instead of grouping all of the links to the
devices in an ibay
Naturally. And don't forget to also create netatalk
shares. You might also
consider
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Greg Zartman wrote:
RAV AntiVirus has deleted this file
because it contained dangerous code!
Care to elaborate, Greg?
I have no idea... I didn't attempt send an attachment and I composed the
message in twiggi so the
Does anyone have this mirrored somewhere?
Thanks.
bh
Filippo Carletti wrote:
A small update of the e-smith-sarg package, to follow Mitel guidelines for
templates.
Also corrected an error on the %postun section.
Who has already installed e-smith-sarg-1.2.1-1.noarch.rpm
should remove it before
I have been using reiserfs on 5 of my systems without incident for
over a year. I've not had to use the repair facilities, so I can't
comment on how well they work. It has never let me down and seems
much more mature than ext3 or xfs which is maybe why reiserfs is
part of the 2.4 kernel today
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Greg Zartman wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Greg Zartman wrote:
RAV AntiVirus has deleted this file
because it contained dangerous code!
Care to elaborate, Greg?
I have no idea... I didn't attempt send an attachment and I composed the
message in twiggi so
Dan,
By using Darrell's suggestions about wget and your instructions to
upgrade php and imp, I am now happily using IMP3.0 on SME5.1.2.
Thanks to both of you once again.
-jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 12:54 PM
Keith Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If I was going to use another file system, it would probably be
IBM's JFS, which is at the 1.0.12 release or so.
Appears to only support the 2.4.x kernel as well. In my limited searches
only Reiser seems to be a 2.2.x solution. This was really my only
Appears to only support the 2.4.x kernel as well. In my limited searches
only Reiser seems to be a 2.2.x solution. This was really my only reason
for running this up the flag pole.
So far we have one person saying Reiser works great. One saying it's best
avoided. One saying that it
Michael Doerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If SME would be based on SuSE rather than Redhat, we wouldn't be talking
about that here at all I guess. Probably we all would be using it (in
combination with a 2.2 kernel).
Thanks for the comments. I think ReiserFS warrants at least a development
13 matches
Mail list logo
