Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release

2003-12-11 Thread Inhabitant of Zion
I noticed that all the ISO's on all the mirror's are 277696mb does that mean they are all the same as the one on the Hungary site or is that now the correct size? If so hadn't somebody better tell people on the general list or they won't realise there is stuff missing? -- John Willby

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso

2003-12-11 Thread Dan Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Samuel wrote: |mv \$OLD_ISO \$NEW_ISO |rsync \$RSYNC_OPTS \$MIRROR/\$NEW_ISO . | | These backslashes are not required. In fact, using them will cause They are required if you're doing the cat EOF stuff, I think. Why Darrell would come

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release

2003-12-11 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 10/12/03 Michael P. Soulier did say: We've pulled the iso, and we're fixing the problem. Stay tuned, and thank you for your continuing patience. The problem has been rectified, and the new iso should make its way to the mirrors over the next 24 hours. To confirm you have the correct

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FormMagick Panels

2003-12-11 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 10/12/03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] did say: Mitel gurus, I'm working on nutting out a rough FormMagick doc/howto and had an idea. Seems to me that one of the primary weaknesses of FormMagick is it's inability to easily make tables. The best approch seems to be to FormMagick has many

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso

2003-12-11 Thread Darrell May
You may find this easier :-) Download this file: http://contribs.org/contribs/dmay/mitel/updates/synciso.sh 1) copy to /root 2) review and edit if needed 3) execute # sh synciso.sh Regards, Darrell -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FormMagick Panels

2003-12-11 Thread Greg Zartman
FormMagick has many limitations. You don't say. ;-) Beyond that, much of FormMagick could be reworked. That's not good news... Historically, we've used the CGI module's methods to output tables. I see nothing wrong with your suggested approach, but I'm unclear as to how it would integrate

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FormMagick Panels

2003-12-11 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 11/12/03 Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) did say: I'll second that. Seems there would have been many easier ways to achieve internationalization -- or internationalisation, if you prefer ;~) I look forward to your solution. :) Mike -- Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], 613-592-2122 x2522

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FormMagick Panels

2003-12-11 Thread Greg Zartman
I look forward to your solution. :) Did I just buy myself a bunch of work or what... :) Have a good one Mike. Greg -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FormMagick Panels

2003-12-11 Thread Tivon Coles
Greg Zartman wrote: FormMagick has many limitations. You don't say. ;-) Beyond that, much of FormMagick could be reworked. That's not good news... Being more a PHP than a perl programmer (but having worked with perl) I can see potential to (at some stage down the line ( eg when

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso (fwd)

2003-12-11 Thread Peter Samuel
Resend as I screwed up the list address the first time. (Not really my day is it? :) -- Regards Peter -- Peter Samuel[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 613 729 7964 -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:44:33 -0500 From: Peter Samuel

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso

2003-12-11 Thread Charlie Brady
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Darrell May wrote: You may find this easier :-) And maybe this easier still! Download this file: http://contribs.org/contribs/dmay/mitel/updates/synciso.sh 1) copy to /root 2) review and edit if needed 3) execute # sh synciso.sh 1) Run: lynx -dump

[e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread Charlie Brady
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Peter Lambert wrote: I also think we need to get a chain of command in place. Some hard decisions are always needed. A lot of the names on the volunteers list are very familiar to anyone whos been on devinfo list. I'm sure most of us could point the finger at people

[e-smith-devinfo] RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread Peter Lambert
I am intending to document all the components (from kernel up) that comprise the 6.0 release which we now have (thanks) and how they fit together and are managed by e-smith. I would find such a document useful (that's why I'm doing it). In fact I think it's the most useful way I can contribute

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread Jeff Coleman
-Original Message- From: Peter Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:41 PM Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss) I am intending to document all the components (from kernel up) that comprise the 6.0 release

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread gzlist
I disagree completely. Free software projects don't work that way. On the contrary Charlie. Show me a major GPL project that doesn't have some type of leadership in place. I think we're getting a little hung up here on semantics -- dictatorship vs structure. There aren't 437 device

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread Charlie Brady
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree completely. Free software projects don't work that way. On the contrary Charlie. Show me a major GPL project that doesn't have some type of leadership in place. My point was, and is, that such leadership comes from *doing*, not

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread Richard Morrell
Charlie Brady wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree completely. Free software projects don't work that way. On the contrary Charlie. Show me a major GPL project that doesn't have some type of leadership in place. My point was, and is, that such

[e-smith-devinfo] Some thoughts on e-smith's Purpose and Architecture

2003-12-11 Thread Dub Dublin
I'm going to take a shot at identifying a few things that we all agree on (or at least that I think we *should* agree on), and one or two that are not so consensual. 1. E-smith is a *server* distribution No X, dev tools, etc. in the default distro, nor should there be. One thing that has

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)

2003-12-11 Thread Darrell May
need to get more organised. The subject may more appropriately be stated as 'Not enough patient Indians'. As you may be aware, I am a volunteer assisting contribs.org. Speaking on behalf of the contribs.org team, I'm sure most everyone here realizes we have had less then two weeks to get