[e-smith-devinfo] CVS dump of current SME source and compiling environment

2003-12-15 Thread Courchesne, Andre
Hi, Is there a way to get or have access to a CVS repository dump (either export or even a tar of the repository itself) of the current SME release (6.0)? Also how are mitel engineer setup to compile the SME sources? What version of linux is used? What packages are installed (output of rpm

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et

2003-12-16 Thread Courchesne, Andre
Personally I found e-smith.org easier and faster to use. It did need maintenance and updates on contribs and how-to, but it was much faster... Just my feeling... One thing using this mailing list... whi isn't the reply-to header changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on e-mails... It's a pain to always

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et

2003-12-17 Thread Courchesne, Andre
at the pros and cons from the mailman list. -Original Message- From: John Cusick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 6:24 PM To: Hsing-Foo Wang Cc: Courchesne, Andre; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et On Tue

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devi nfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)

2003-12-17 Thread Courchesne, Andre
- From: Rasjid Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net) On Thursday 18 December 2003 01:08, Courchesne, Andre wrote

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devi nfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)

2003-12-17 Thread Courchesne, Andre
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Reply to List option (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net) On 18 Dec 2003 at 1:27, Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 18 December 2003 01:08, Courchesne, Andre wrote: What I find anoying is that I

[e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?

2003-12-17 Thread Courchesne, Andre
Hi, First, I know 5.5 is outdated and maybe noone will want to answer questions on it. But I'm shooting anyway... By looking at the directories of SRPMS and RPMS, I found the following discrepancy: SRPMS: e-smith-release-5.5beta9-01 RPMS: e-smith-release-5.5-03

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?

2003-12-17 Thread Courchesne, Andre
:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ? On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:38:09PM -0500, Courchesne, Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If e-smith-release-5.5-03 is more recent can it's corresponsing source package be made available? For what it's worth

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ?

2003-12-18 Thread Courchesne, Andre
Great thanks. Just wanted to make sure everything was in sync. -Original Message- From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:39 AM To: Courchesne, Andre Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SRPMS vs RPMS discrepancy ? On Wed, Dec

[e-smith-devinfo] Error compiline e-smith-boot-image-1.6.3-01

2003-12-19 Thread Courchesne, Andre
Hi, I'm trying to compile e-smith-boot-image-1.6.3-01.src.rpm and it seems to be hard coded to a development directory specific to Mitel development environment... Here is what I get when doing an rpm -ba: --SNIP START-- Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20168 + umask 022 + cd