Darrell:
One of the problems with installing add-ons from different developers, is
that the sum total may not play nicely with each other, depending on the mix. A
new iso, containing the more (most) popular add-ons and tested to work properly,
would be a very big step forward from the
Charlie:
I have to jump in on this one: Adaptec Raid Controllers. They have a Linux
driver for 2.2.16, but none for 2.2.19 -- in other words, only the major point
releases of RH. I have such a server, and know of 5 more.
Regards,
Tom
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jaime
I know this is off-topic, but I hope you all won't mind.
http://staging.infoworld.com/articles/ne/xml/02/02/25/020225nelinuxfire.xml
--
Poor old Peter, Tom, and Dan,
Hanging on as long as they can.
Replace those fossils With three John Stossels.
Topple TV's Taliban.
--
Please report bugs to
If anyone is set up to compile on 5.1.2, I'd be grateful if you
could compile a 3ware raid driver for me. They have provided the
.c, the .h, a text explanation, and a redhat makefile. If a small
payment is required, I can handle that too.
Thanks,
Tom Keiser
--
Poor old Peter, Tom, and Dan
It isn't cheap, but Goldmine for Windows does about everything you would ever
want, and the server end runs happily on Linux. In fact, they have a
client/server version that will run on a Linux SQL backend.
Ed Form wrote:
Greg said...
Maybe this is a good project: Put together a groupware
Try: http://myezserver.com/downloads/mitel/contrib/dev-tools/
Tom
Greg J. Zartman wrote:
clearly easier to do than bother explaining how to do :-) He's right
though - you need a redhat development environment, not an SME server to
develop RPMs. Do yourself a favour and install redhat on
In times past, people on this list have (probably
rightfully) noted the anemic performance of Promise Raid
cards, and that it's not even a true raid.
However, there's an interesting article about building a
high-perf server here:
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1549/
They found
I would like to suggest some sort of rating scheme, in which those
users successful or unsuccessful in implementing a mod could: rate it
from 1 to n for (a) installability; (b) manageability; (c) features,
etc. Also, a place for noting any problems, bugs, or praise. If a number
of people were
