me: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/f0bcd986/attachment.pgp>
lives lost
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/ee78d339/attachment.html>
-
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/385444bb/attachment.html>
-
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/27531dd7/attachment.html>
-
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/46076bac/attachment.html>
On 10 Sep 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Edgar Friendly writes:
>
> > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Pub/MetadataSpec
> >
> > The relevant options are CheckBlockCount and Graph.. The idea is
> > simply that each check block is the XOR of a combination of data
> > blocks.
>
rge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Looking for $coding (I'm cheap)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/a73f25e0/attachment.pgp>
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020911/3c21044f/attachment.pgp>
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
Updated Freenet today and was pleased to see that, even though it is still there, at least theIE message is more maturely worded. However, for those of us without access to a Java compiler (and a limited knowledge of Java for that matter) wouldn't it make more sense to just have a check box
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 05:45:36PM -0700, Reuben Balik wrote:
Updated Freenet today and was pleased to see that, even though it is
still there, at least the IE message is more maturely worded.
However, for those of us without access to a Java compiler (and a
limited knowledge of Java for
Here's a description of the fcp commands I want to add to do FEC
encoding/decoding.
I have a working implementation with encoder and decoder plugins based on the
OnionNetworks Java FEC library. It has JNI native code support for Windows,
x86 linux and Solaris.
Unfortunately, I don't have
FCP FEC Proposal rev. 1.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020912
I. INTRODUCTION:
This proposal presents a set of new FCP commands that can be used to
encode and decode files using forward error correction (FEC).
FEC is a way of encoding packetized data files with extra error
recovery information which
14 matches
Mail list logo