Juiceman skrev:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Juiceman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Zero3 wrote:
>>> Juiceman skrev:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Zero3 wrote:
> Juiceman skrev:
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Zero3
>> wrote:
>>> Juiceman skrev:
Juiceman skrev:
> Currently we distribute our installer using a name such as
> FreenetInstaller-1223.exe but we call it 0.7.5 I suggest we use the
> nomenclature FreenetInstaller-0.7.5.1223.exe that is more in line with
> what appears to be standard amongst many applications.
>
> Thoughts?
I
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 18:08:50, brendan at artvote.com a ?crit :
> Hi All,
> Over the past couple months I've been speaking with Ian about your
> fascinating project and recently, he's asked me to give feedback on the new
> site design so I've included a previous email addressing that below.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
> Url :
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/pi
.
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090721/1376fc2a/attachment.pgp>
mail/devl/attachments/20090721/c6e1c18a/attachment.pgp>
enet UI isn't all that photogenic :-)
I agree with pretty-much all your other points. Clement, can you comment on
this?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed.
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090721/ee76525a/attachment.html>
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 02:22:55 Juiceman wrote:
Currently we distribute our installer using a name such as
FreenetInstaller-1223.exe but we call it 0.7.5 I suggest we use the
nomenclature FreenetInstaller-0.7.5.1223.exe that is more in line with
what appears to be standard amongst many
On Saturday 18 July 2009 04:51:51 Ian Clarke wrote:
Currently seeing this with the current testing build on a mac:
The specified plugin
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/plugins/next-build/Freetalk.jarco
uld not be loaded: unexpected error while plugin loading
Hey Brendan,
Thanks for sending this, I can't tell you how valuable it is to get a fresh
perspective on this stuff from an expert.
As far as color, do you have sense of what you want the brand colors to be?
It looks like the new release of the app, and the logo mark, are blue.
Perhaps consider
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 18:08:50, bren...@artvote.com a écrit :
Hi All,
Over the past couple months I've been speaking with Ian about your
fascinating project and recently, he's asked me to give feedback on the new
site design so I've included a previous email addressing that below.
Looking
le
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090721/c6e1c18a/attachment.pgp
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:48:26 +0200
From: xor x...@gmx.li
/attachments/20090721/c6e1c18a/attachment.pgp
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:48:26 +0200
From: xor x...@gmx.li
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] UnsupportedClassVersion
To: Discussion of development issues devl@freenetproject.org
Message-ID: 200907211148.33060
Juiceman skrev:
Currently we distribute our installer using a name such as
FreenetInstaller-1223.exe but we call it 0.7.5 I suggest we use the
nomenclature FreenetInstaller-0.7.5.1223.exe that is more in line with
what appears to be standard amongst many applications.
Thoughts?
I think
Juiceman skrev:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Juicemanjuicema...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Zero3ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
Juiceman skrev:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Zero3ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote:
Juiceman skrev:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:59 AM,
16 matches
Mail list logo