[freenet-dev] Updating helper executables on Windows

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sunday 26 July 2009 00:20:03 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Monday 13 July 2009 07:03:53 Juiceman wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Zero3 wrote: >> > > Matthew Toseland skrev: >> > >> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:22:13 Zero3

[freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090730/d0da6e6b/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Updating helper executables on Windows

;>>> yet another third party utility. > > >>>> Well, they should be fetched from > > >>>> http[s]://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/, not from > > >>>> downloads... are the relevant files currently available from checksums? > > >>> I don't know if they are? I never had anything to do with the actual > > >>> uploading of the files to anywhere on freenetproject.org. > > >> > > >> I do ... what files exactly do you need? Note that we may need to change > > >> from https://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/filename to some other > > >> domain at some point, but we can hopefully do that by changing the > > >> update scripts. > > > > > > Besides the wrapper .exe and .dll, we need at least the latest built > > > freenerlauncher.exe to be available, so that we can > > > add/remove/update/reprioritize browser support. > > > > > > - Zero3 > > > > I'm working on the update.cmd script handling these binaries... it > > seems the .sha1 of all of these files is blank on the website. The > > wrappers, start.exe, stop.exe and the freenetlauncher.exe. I'll need > > that fixed please to continue my work ;-) > > Will fix before releasing next stable build. Sorry. > Sorry, these are uploaded manually at the moment. The sha1's have been fixed for now. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090730/840fff51/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Source vs local node names

that sent the message? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090730/eac29

[freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

Matthew Toseland skrev: > It has been pointed out that a minimal blog engine can be written in approx > 22KB of php - around 800 lines of code at most. I suspect that given a > template I could probably put together a blog plugin in a few days. This > would integrate with Freetalk for comments

[freenet-dev] Status report of GSoC and testing welcome

Hello everyone! Another functionality ready, so I'm writing another status report. This time, I upload a snapshot of the current version, and ask everybody to try it and report bugs if you find some. The new functionality is async image loading. So if you visit a freesite that has images on it,

[freenet-dev] [plugin-Library] some recent change

2009/7/30 Daniel Cheng : > (to toad@, ?cc devl@ ?and infinity0@ ) > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mike Bush wrote: >> Yeah we are both working on freenet/plugin-Library-Staging. >> I haven't pushed the FredPluginAPI thing to freenet, it's in >>

[freenet-dev] Freereader - a freenet plugin

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 10:11:01 Mario Volke wrote: >> ?The plugin-Freefreader-staging and ...-official repos are still not >> available. >> ?Could you create them? My github account name is "webholics". > > Sorry ... Imported, and

[freenet-dev] [plugin-Library] some recent change

(to toad@, cc devl@ and infinity0@ ) On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mike Bush wrote: > Yeah we are both working on freenet/plugin-Library-Staging. > I haven't pushed the FredPluginAPI thing to freenet, it's in > platy/fred-staging. Yesterday some problems with the way it is > supposed to work

[freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 30 July 2009 14:52:49 Zero3 wrote: >> Matthew Toseland skrev: >> > It has been pointed out that a minimal blog engine can be written in >> > approx 22KB of php - around 800 lines of code at most. I suspect that >> > given a

[freenet-dev] Status report of GSoC and testing welcome

This is great, should have a very positive impact on usability. When can we get this into the testing branch? Ian. -- Typed with thumbs, please excuse typos and brevity On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:04 AM, sashee wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Another functionality ready, so I'm writing another

[freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090730/cb2e1640/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] [plugin-Library] some recent change

(to toad@, cc devl@ and infinity0@ ) On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mike Bushmpb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah we are both working on freenet/plugin-Library-Staging. I haven't pushed the FredPluginAPI thing to freenet, it's in platy/fred-staging. Yesterday some problems with the way it is

Re: [freenet-dev] Freereader - a freenet plugin

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 15 July 2009 10:11:01 Mario Volke wrote:  The plugin-Freefreader-staging and ...-official repos are still not available.  Could you create them? My github account name is webholics. Sorry ...

[freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

It has been pointed out that a minimal blog engine can be written in approx 22KB of php - around 800 lines of code at most. I suspect that given a template I could probably put together a blog plugin in a few days. This would integrate with Freetalk for comments and for announcing the site

Re: [freenet-dev] New website : is it ready ?

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Ian Clarkei...@locut.us wrote: Definitely progress, the spacing is still weird on this text:  http://img.skitch.com/20090716-tuwgbrc2pjgh27t73br7q6859s.png I've asked some people for their feedback too. Ian. I think the title Share, chat and browse

[freenet-dev] Status report of GSoC and testing welcome

Hello everyone! Another functionality ready, so I'm writing another status report. This time, I upload a snapshot of the current version, and ask everybody to try it and report bugs if you find some. The new functionality is async image loading. So if you visit a freesite that has images on it,

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

Matthew Toseland skrev: It has been pointed out that a minimal blog engine can be written in approx 22KB of php - around 800 lines of code at most. I suspect that given a template I could probably put together a blog plugin in a few days. This would integrate with Freetalk for comments and

Re: [freenet-dev] [plugin-Library] some recent change

2009/7/30 Daniel Cheng j16sdiz+free...@gmail.com: (to toad@,  cc devl@  and infinity0@ ) On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mike Bushmpb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah we are both working on freenet/plugin-Library-Staging. I haven't pushed the FredPluginAPI thing to freenet, it's in

[freenet-dev] Source vs local node names

IMHO the best way to handle this is to keep a week reference to the PeerNode, so we can display the current name of the node which sent the message, no? Thinking particularly of 0f68ca45ef5521fc9b5672053f6c04bf80ae0c7f - why do we need to parse it out of the SFS, don't we already know the node

Re: [freenet-dev] Updating helper executables on Windows

On Sunday 26 July 2009 00:20:03 Matthew Toseland wrote: On Monday 13 July 2009 07:03:53 Juiceman wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Zero3ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:22:13 Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: On Thursday 21

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

On Thursday 30 July 2009 14:52:49 Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: It has been pointed out that a minimal blog engine can be written in approx 22KB of php - around 800 lines of code at most. I suspect that given a template I could probably put together a blog plugin in a few days.

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet blog plugin?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009 14:52:49 Zero3 wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: It has been pointed out that a minimal blog engine can be written in approx 22KB of php - around 800 lines of code at most. I suspect that

Re: [freenet-dev] Status report of GSoC and testing welcome

This is great, should have a very positive impact on usability. When can we get this into the testing branch? Ian. -- Typed with thumbs, please excuse typos and brevity On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:04 AM, sashee gsas...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone! Another functionality ready, so I'm

Re: [freenet-dev] Updating helper executables on Windows

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Sunday 26 July 2009 00:20:03 Matthew Toseland wrote: On Monday 13 July 2009 07:03:53 Juiceman wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Zero3ze...@zerosplayground.dk wrote: Matthew Toseland skrev: On