a much
less powerful approach to avoiding minimums. I suspect FOAF routing
helps a lot here, but that seems like it might be problematic from a
security perspective as well.
In general, making routing better (link length distribution, mainly)
will make this less of an issue; local minimums are a problem that
results when you have too few short links, which is the current
problem with the network.
> DARKNET
> ==
>
> Best solution is to make darknet easy!
>
> We also need to fix darknet. That means fixing Pitch Black.
Among other problems. Location stability interactions with datastore,
and opennet/darknet hybrid nodes, in particular.
It also means we need to focus on the user experience when setting up
darknet, which currently sucks.
Evan Daniel
nodes, in particular.
It also means we need to focus on the user experience when setting up
darknet, which currently sucks.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 01 Sep 2011 15:29:35 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> >> I like this proposal :)
>> >>
>> >> Is the documentation on the ma
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 01 Sep 2011 15:29:35 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I like this proposal :)
Is the documentation on the math of how to get
ear" than "years" in my case. I don't
really remember. The changeover and operation since was unmemorable.
I run a higher memory limit than some will, which might be relevant.
I'm generally in favor of such a change.
Evan Daniel
riod means that low-uptime nodes will have a somewhat
disproportionately lower chance of being in the sample (I think...
need to do math here), but isn't a huge problem.
Evan Daniel
to do math here), but isn't a huge problem.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
I'm in favor, and I suspect I'm the author of that line :)
I also don't actually care that much, so feel free to change it to 4.
On Apr 2, 2012 6:07 PM, "Matthew Toseland"
wrote:
On Friday 30 Mar 2012 19:34:02 Juiceman wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2012 1:12 PM, "Matthew Toseland"
I'm in favor, and I suspect I'm the author of that line :)
I also don't actually care that much, so feel free to change it to 4.
On Apr 2, 2012 6:07 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Friday 30 Mar 2012 19:34:02 Juiceman wrote:
On Mar 30, 2012 1:12 PM, Matthew Toseland
ndards is what we would
like to have for new code.
Evan Daniel
like to have for new code.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> I am de-emphasising a release because frankly Freenet isn't ready, and even
> if it was, until the exams I'm only going to have one or two days a week
> available, and I need to be around during a major release. That's just what
> I'm
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I am de-emphasising a release because frankly Freenet isn't ready, and even
if it was, until the exams I'm only going to have one or two days a week
available, and I need to be around during a major release.
And I see a checkstyle patch submitted. Is there an Eclipse patch?
(Speaking as someone who doesn't use Eclipse...)
Seems to me like both are worthy additions. Along with any other
similar tools, as long as they're maintained.
Evan Daniel
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
Exactly. We already had this discussion and came to an agreement. New
code should follow it. Patches to fix old code would be welcome :)
Evan
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm all for it. The coding standard is
Exactly. We already had this discussion and came to an agreement. New
code should follow it. Patches to fix old code would be welcome :)
Evan
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm all for it. The coding
SS3, will older browsers manage ok? I don't
have a problem with outdated insecure browsers producing a lower
quality result, but I'd like to be certain they won't break
completely.
In general, usability and design improvements are something we would
very much like help with.
Evan Daniel
insecure browsers producing a lower
quality result, but I'd like to be certain they won't break
completely.
In general, usability and design improvements are something we would
very much like help with.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 20:24:10 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > commit cb21f7d4bc5e1940b6acdb49004b912f8fb705e5
>> > Author: Matthew Toseland
>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> commit cb21f7d4bc5e1940b6acdb49004b912f8fb705e5
> Author: Matthew Toseland
> Date: ? Thu Mar 15 14:18:10 2012 +
>
> ? ?Tweak peers limit by bandwidth SCALING_CONSTANT: Lots of peers are on the
> high end of the peers limit. Reduce
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
commit cb21f7d4bc5e1940b6acdb49004b912f8fb705e5
Author: Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
Date: Thu Mar 15 14:18:10 2012 +
Tweak peers limit by bandwidth SCALING_CONSTANT: Lots of peers are
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 15 Mar 2012 20:24:10 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
commit cb21f7d4bc5e1940b6acdb49004b912f8fb705e5
Author: Matthew Toseland
traffic levels,
that's not likely to be an issue?
Evan Daniel
not likely to be an issue?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 04 Mar 2012 16:09:41 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > On Friday 02 Mar 2012 07:36:22 Steve Dougherty wrote:
>> >> Matthew has said
ng we have a volunteer
for that. I'm not sure that makes things any easier though :/
Evan Daniel
for that. I'm not sure that makes things any easier though :/
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Sunday 04 Mar 2012 16:09:41 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 02 Mar 2012 07:36:22 Steve Dougherty wrote:
Matthew has said he's
dds up, right?? :)
>
> Should we put a link to gun.io freenet projects from the main freenet
> website, perhaps under the "Donate" tab call it "Post a bounty!" ?
Awesome, thanks!
And yes, I like that idea a lot! I bet we have some users willing to
vote with their wallets on our bug reports ;)
Evan Daniel
the main freenet
website, perhaps under the Donate tab call it Post a bounty! ?
Awesome, thanks!
And yes, I like that idea a lot! I bet we have some users willing to
vote with their wallets on our bug reports ;)
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ian Clarke
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
>>>
>>> Dumb question time: how would I go about searching for hypothetical
>>> free
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote:
Dumb question time: how would I go about searching for hypothetical
freenet
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
>>
>> Dumb question time: how would I go about searching for hypothetical
>> freenet tasks on gun.io?
>
>
> Right now there are only 10 open source gigs lis
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Michael Grube
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Evan Daniel wrote:
>>
>> Submitting a response to the Pitch Black paper seems a bit premature,
>> given that in the real world we probably have network distribution
>> prob
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Michael Grube michael.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote:
Submitting a response to the Pitch Black paper seems a bit premature,
given that in the real world we probably have network distribution
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote:
Dumb question time: how would I go about searching for hypothetical
freenet tasks on gun.io?
Right now there are only 10 open source gigs listed
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I recieved the following email from Rich Jones, creator of Gun.io. ?This
> could be a very interesting way for us to get specific tasks done...
>
> -- Forwarded message --
>
> ...snip...
>
> My name is Rich Jones, and I'm the
of understanding of what is
actually happening on the network.
And, if you're looking for papers, I think several interesting ones
could be written on that subject :)
Evan Daniel
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Will you submit? ?These guys have rejected our papers in the p
of understanding of what is
actually happening on the network.
And, if you're looking for papers, I think several interesting ones
could be written on that subject :)
Evan Daniel
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Ian Clarke i...@locut.us wrote:
Will you submit? These guys have rejected our papers in the past
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org wrote:
I recieved the following email from Rich Jones, creator of Gun.io. This
could be a very interesting way for us to get specific tasks done...
-- Forwarded message --
...snip...
My name is Rich Jones,
's mentioned in the bug report:
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3568
And there's a code snippet on my flog, that's used in my simulator:
freenet:USK at
gjw6StjZOZ4OAG-pqOxIp5Nk11udQZOrozD4jld42Ac,BYyqgAtc9p0JGbJ~18XU6mtO9ChnBZdf~ttCn48FV7s,AQACAAE/flog/29/200909.xhtml
(Entry for 20090926)
Evan Daniel
://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3568
And there's a code snippet on my flog, that's used in my simulator:
freenet:USK@gjw6StjZOZ4OAG-pqOxIp5Nk11udQZOrozD4jld42Ac,BYyqgAtc9p0JGbJ~18XU6mtO9ChnBZdf~ttCn48FV7s,AQACAAE/flog/29/200909.xhtml
(Entry for 20090926)
Evan Daniel
>
> IMHO some or all of the above are worth seriously considering before
> deploying any new scheme. If we want to be empirical we need to measure the
> effect of our changes on the real network, not only in simulation.
>
> _______
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
I like this proposal :)
Is the documentation on the math of how to get the random routing to
behave well sufficient? Let me know if it isn't. The MHMC routing math
shouldn't be too complicated, but we want to be certain it's
implemented correctly so that the data is sound.
Evan Daniel
if it isn't. The MHMC routing math
shouldn't be too complicated, but we want to be certain it's
implemented correctly so that the data is sound.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
mandatory at all? And what the warning period should be? If not, it
seems like something we should have.
Evan Daniel
at all? And what the warning period should be? If not, it
seems like something we should have.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
ier today. I'm showing no writes to store, cache, or
client cache since then (but yes to slashdot cache). This is true
across all three key types, even on the nearly empty pubkey stores.
Evan Daniel
to store, cache, or
client cache since then (but yes to slashdot cache). This is true
across all three key types, even on the nearly empty pubkey stores.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
are
actually directly applicable to the current network, given the
combination of LRU peers selection, FOAF routing, and variable peer
counts with capacity. The models also don't tell us what to do about
the fact that some nodes generate a lot more requests than others.
Evan Daniel
are
actually directly applicable to the current network, given the
combination of LRU peers selection, FOAF routing, and variable peer
counts with capacity. The models also don't tell us what to do about
the fact that some nodes generate a lot more requests than others.
Evan Daniel
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 14:33 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> On Saturday 03 July 2010 23:50:00 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Marco A. Calamari
>> wrote:
>
>> > Huh? ?So don
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Marco A. Calamari marc...@dada.it wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 14:33 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2010 23:50:00 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Marco A. Calamari marc...@dada.it
wrote:
Huh? So don't upgrade until
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 12:59 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Marco A. Calamari
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 16:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> >> Freenet 0.7.5
or on some persistent
>
> No way to insert medium/big thing since long, long times ago .
What do you mean by this? What did you do, and what happened?
Evan Daniel
persistent
No way to insert medium/big thing since long, long times ago .
What do you mean by this? What did you do, and what happened?
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Marco A. Calamari marc...@dada.it wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 12:59 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Marco A. Calamari marc...@dada.it
wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 16:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1258 is now
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 16:54:42 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Robert Hailey
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> >
>>
sertion logic
> 2) network change over time
> 3) fetch logic
>
> If there is a major issue with 2 or 3, then beefing up 1 may not be a "good"
> solution. Then again, I like your ideas more than just chalking it up to
> "bad network topology"...
Bad topology is not confined to those areas. The insert / fetch logic
can be locally correct, and the network static, and bad topology will
still produce poor performance.
Evan Daniel
. The insert / fetch logic
can be locally correct, and the network static, and bad topology will
still produce poor performance.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 16:54:42 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Robert Hailey
rob...@freenetproject.org wrote:
On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Tests showed ages
time, until
it reaches some relatively low HTL (10?). This prevents the attacker
from moving during the insert. On a large file that takes a long time
to insert, this is problematic, because there aren't enough
connections that are old enough to route along. For a partial
reinsert, this is less of a concern, simply because it doesn't take as
long.
Evan Daniel
to insert, this is problematic, because there aren't enough
connections that are old enough to route along. For a partial
reinsert, this is less of a concern, simply because it doesn't take as
long.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
; 128 data blocks on small files, right? With >
520 total data blocks, it should be max 128 data blocks per segment
(ie at 5 segments or more). And with less than that, the appropriate
max depends on file size.
Evan Daniel
data blocks, it should be max 128 data blocks per segment
(ie at 5 segments or more). And with less than that, the appropriate
max depends on file size.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
on time of day. Number of total users is somewhere
in the 15k-20k range, and depends mostly on how you define "user".
The data is generated based on probe requests; see that site, my flog
(linked from it), and the mailing list archives for more details.
Evan Daniel
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 a
of day. Number of total users is somewhere
in the 15k-20k range, and depends mostly on how you define user.
The data is generated based on probe requests; see that site, my flog
(linked from it), and the mailing list archives for more details.
Evan Daniel
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:59 PM, DJ
that I can get a diff that shows only the changes made by the
>> filter. ?If I need to run tidy on the original, and then diff that vs
>> the filtered output, that's fine by me.
>>
>> And anything that makes the filtering more robust and less work is a
>> big
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Spencer Jackson
wrote:
> tOn Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday 08 May 2010 05:09:07 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Spencer Jackson
>> > wrote:
>> >
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Saturday 08 May 2010 05:09:07 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Spencer Jackson
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 12:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> >> On Thursday
the filtering more robust and less work is a
big win, imho.
Evan Daniel
No way. We have a filter which works (security-wise), why would we change?
Auditing upstream changes is going to be more time-expensive than maintaining
our own
because it implements only a subset of the features
d? Not writing them isn't always valid; see eg bug 4125: current
code happily removes required attributes from tags, thus
breaking valid pages.
Depending how much cleaning of the HTML filtering system you want to
do... Has using something like JTidy ( http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/
) been discussed? That way you wouldn't have to worry about what's
valid or invalid HTML, merely the security aspects of valid HTML that
are unique to Freenet.
Evan Daniel
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 08 May 2010 05:09:07 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Spencer Jackson
spencerandrewjack...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 12:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Spencer Jackson
spencerandrewjack...@gmail.com wrote:
tOn Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 08 May 2010 05:09:07 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Spencer Jackson
spencerandrewjack
like JTidy ( http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/
) been discussed? That way you wouldn't have to worry about what's
valid or invalid HTML, merely the security aspects of valid HTML that
are unique to Freenet.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 18 February 2010 20:44:57 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> I've followed up my previous crude estimates of node churn with some
>> more detailed numbers. ?(See my mail in re: "data persistence again"
>> o
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 20:44:57 Evan Daniel wrote:
I've followed up my previous crude estimates of node churn with some
more detailed numbers. (See my mail in re: data persistence again
on 20100122
round regardless!).
So I think making the bug tracker inaccessible to them is very bad.
Switching to something else is a pain, and we haven't managed to agree
on what to switch to before.
So I like the first option, for now. We can revisit as needed.
Evan Daniel
.
Switching to something else is a pain, and we haven't managed to agree
on what to switch to before.
So I like the first option, for now. We can revisit as needed.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin
are certainly welcome. Hopefully it wont be too long before I
can toss some example numbers into the discussion.
Evan Daniel
are certainly welcome. Hopefully it wont be too long before I
can toss some example numbers into the discussion.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Friday 09 April 2010 09:08:18 artur wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 08.04.2010 17:42, schrieb Evan Daniel:
>> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> > ?wrote:
>> >
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2010 09:08:18 artur wrote:
Hi,
Am 08.04.2010 17:42, schrieb Evan Daniel:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 18
ing system that's so spammed it's unusable, or link to
nothing.
I guess I don't actually have a strong opinion on the matter. Slight
vote for not having it on the list.
Evan Daniel
It
looks to me more like a timeline for writing the code, as opposed to a
timeline for writing the code, documenting it, writing unit tests, and
debugging it. I know that writing copious documentation and unit
tests as we go isn't how Freenet normally does things, but it would be
nice to improve on that standard :) I think adding 1 day worth of
documentation and unit tests after each of your listed steps would
make a meaningful improvement to the resultant body of work. Of
course, others might disagree, and it's not a big concern. Like I
said, this looks good.
Evan Daniel
on that standard :) I think adding 1 day worth of
documentation and unit tests after each of your listed steps would
make a meaningful improvement to the resultant body of work. Of
course, others might disagree, and it's not a big concern. Like I
said, this looks good.
Evan Daniel
vote for not having it on the list.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as
> CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this while the
> wiki is still young.
Yes, we do.
Evan Daniel
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ximin Luo xl...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
atm the wiki content is licensed with GFDL. Do we want to relicense it as
CC-BY-SA (attribution+sharealike) instead? If so, we should do this while the
wiki is still young.
Yes, we do.
Evan Daniel
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Friday 02 April 2010 17:43:25 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > On Friday 02 April 2010 17:31:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 09 M
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 02 April 2010 17:43:25 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 02 April 2010 17:31:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 09
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Friday 02 April 2010 17:31:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 04:27:24 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> > You should really send these to the support list; that's what it's for.
>> >
>> >
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 02 April 2010 17:31:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 04:27:24 Evan Daniel wrote:
You should really send these to the support list; that's what it's for.
You can change
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:33:01 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> Currently, when we need to drop an opennet connection, we use the LRU
>> (least recently used) policy: we drop the connection that has least
>> recently served
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:42 AM, xor wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 06:32:58 am Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> > have you joined the freenet-dev mailing list? in future i'd like to have
>> > these discussions there s
or not, there are *vastly* more important
things to worry about than what to do once we have 1M users -- like
how to get that many users in the first place. That sort of scaling
problem gets put in the "nice problems to have" category in my book.
Evan Daniel
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:42 AM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 06:32:58 am Evan Daniel wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Ximin Luo xl...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
have you joined the freenet-dev mailing list? in future i'd like to have
these discussions there so that other
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 18:33:01 Evan Daniel wrote:
Currently, when we need to drop an opennet connection, we use the LRU
(least recently used) policy: we drop the connection that has least
recently served
that means.
Evan Daniel
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14 AM, ??? wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for telling me so many things about the microblogging. I do not
> really sure whether I have understand all the things. I think what you mean
> is that the system is similar as chat room. If I
that means.
Evan Daniel
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14 AM, 陈天一 chentiany...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for telling me so many things about the microblogging. I do not
really sure whether I have understand all the things. I think what you mean
is that the system is similar as chat room. If I input
things to worry about than what to do once we have 1M users -- like
how to get that many users in the first place. That sort of scaling
problem gets put in the nice problems to have category in my book.
Evan Daniel
___
Devl mailing list
Devl
1 - 100 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
