, we make decisions by discussions in a public forum like
this.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: i...@uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
think there have been elements
of that on both sides of this discussion.
We all want the same thing at the end of it, a Freenet which meets the
goals of the project, and is easy to install and use.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: i...@uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276
ncouraging Zero3 to do this and offering to help in any
way possible, not attacking him.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
be encouraging Zero3 to do this and offering to help in any
way possible, not attacking him.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: i...@uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
installer, warn the user close to
> the beginning. We can provide a kill-the-autostart script, and even put it on
> the start menu, but we should not have to ask the user whether to auto-start:
> we should just do it.
>
> Any opinions?
Agreed.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email:
I've created an account for Freenet at http://freenet.uservoice.com/
and added links to the website in an effort to make it easier for
users to provide us with feedback (Mantis isn't exactly
user-friendly).
Let me know what you think, and feel free to add and/or vote on ideas.
Ian.
--
Ian
I've created an account for Freenet at http://freenet.uservoice.com/
and added links to the website in an effort to make it easier for
users to provide us with feedback (Mantis isn't exactly
user-friendly).
Let me know what you think, and feel free to add and/or vote on ideas.
Ian.
--
Ian
gt;> + src="<a rel="nofollow" href="http://cetrk.com/pages/scripts/0009/9311.js"">http://cetrk.com/pages/scripts/0009/9311.js"</a>;>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
___
cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
omeone needs to be able to come to the front page of the web
interface and intuitively understand what they can do next, I don't
believe that is the case with the current UI - its too focussed on
providing diagnostics and functionality for users that are already
experienced and know what Freenet is all a
they can do next, I don't
believe that is the case with the current UI - its too focussed on
providing diagnostics and functionality for users that are already
experienced and know what Freenet is all about.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1
; fQGiK~CfI8zO4cuNyhPRLqYZ5TyGUme8lMiRnS9TCaU,E3S1MLoeeeEM45fDLdVV~n8PCr9pt6GMq0tuH4dRP7c,AQACAAE/freenethg/45
> /your/local/path
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Ratchet
> _______
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
Freenet after all. Remember also that Napster probably wouldn't have
worked if they hadn't defaulted to auto-running. Obviously Freenet !=
Napster, but the analogy is valid in this case.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
that Napster probably wouldn't have
worked if they hadn't defaulted to auto-running. Obviously Freenet !=
Napster, but the analogy is valid in this case.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
easier.
Lastly, we could put out a high-profile appeal for people to help us
create solid intuitive platform-specific installers (assuming no
existing volunteers want to take on the task).
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
.
Lastly, we could put out a high-profile appeal for people to help us
create solid intuitive platform-specific installers (assuming no
existing volunteers want to take on the task).
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
at doesn't require his deep
understanding of the guts of Freenet, and so its probably not the best
use of his time.
The ideal solution would be for someone to take this on voluntarily.
Its not sexy work, but its hugely important, any takers?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM, David 'Bombe' Roden
wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2008 18:25:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
>> I see no reason why Freenet's installation process couldn't be as elegant as
>> littleshoot's.
>
> Here's what it says for installing under Linux
no
reason why Freenet's installation process couldn't be as elegant as
littleshoot's.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
no
reason why Freenet's installation process couldn't be as elegant as
littleshoot's.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
Fax: +1 512 276 6674
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM, David 'Bombe' Roden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 18:25:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
I see no reason why Freenet's installation process couldn't be as elegant as
littleshoot's.
Here's what it says for installing under Linux:
# sudo tar xzvf
understanding of the guts of Freenet, and so its probably not the best
use of his time.
The ideal solution would be for someone to take this on voluntarily.
Its not sexy work, but its hugely important, any takers?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: +1 512 422 3588
he meeting to become a regular one or
> not (could have a weekly meeting for instance)
I think weekly IRC meetings are a great idea.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
a regular one or
not (could have a weekly meeting for instance)
I think weekly IRC meetings are a great idea.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
;)
IRC is hardly the appropriate medium for this, its unreasonable to
expect everyone to keep an eye on it. The mailing list should be used
for such requests.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl
significant impact here if we just make this
run for a single user? I agree that the security implications of allowing
any user of a laptop to access FProxy probably outweigh the potential loss
to the network of Freenet nodes when someone other than the person that
installed Freenet is using the
of a laptop to access FProxy probably outweigh the potential loss
to the network of Freenet nodes when someone other than the person that
installed Freenet is using the computer.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
netproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
und
2) It is in a box with sharp corners, everything else has rounded corners
How about put it in a dark-red box with rounded corners, possibly with
a shiny effect as with the menu?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
oticed.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
on the title is rather cliched these
days, its very 2005
- There is a lot of empty space above and below the search box - this
seems wasteful (with Google all the empty space is at the bottom)
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
these
days, its very 2005
- There is a lot of empty space above and below the search box - this
seems wasteful (with Google all the empty space is at the bottom)
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
on a dark background
2) It is in a box with sharp corners, everything else has rounded corners
How about put it in a dark-red box with rounded corners, possibly with
a shiny effect as with the menu?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
Is there a good reason for this? Most of what I read about forcing a
GC suggests that it normally does more harm than good, and is best
avoided.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
for this? Most of what I read about forcing a
GC suggests that it normally does more harm than good, and is best
avoided.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
up a Google Code project for it, for example.
Would anyone be interested in putting together mock-ups of what they
think the FProxy front page should look like?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
up a Google Code project for it, for example.
Would anyone be interested in putting together mock-ups of what they
think the FProxy front page should look like?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl
f course, what we really want is proper support for search in the
protocol, but that is a tall order.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
>> > 1. Bootstrapping is working extremely slowly at the moment. It takes 5-10
>> >
into our current priorities?
IMHO they should be close to the top - without significant growth in
users we are screwed.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
priorities?
IMHO they should be close to the top - without significant growth in
users we are screwed.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Bootstrapping is working extremely slowly at the moment. It takes 5-10
minutes
we really want is proper support for search in the
protocol, but that is a tall order.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
, but we need to refine it to figure out
where we need to be focussing our efforts to improve retention of
users. Clearly, this survey suggests that our installation and set-up
process is still a weak point for us.
Thoughts?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1
ation with the old code
> will be 1004 / 8 * 2 = 250, and the block within the byte will again be 0.
>
> Have you tried running the BloomFilterTest I committed against your code, with
> a counting filter vs a non-counting one?
Why aren't you using a BitSet for this?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
, with
a counting filter vs a non-counting one?
Why aren't you using a BitSet for this?
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 16:17, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> Incidentally, where did the '5 friend' requirement come from.
>>
>> Is opennet more secure than having 4 friends?
>
> Opennet is probably more secur
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 16:17, Ian Clarke wrote:
Incidentally, where did the '5 friend' requirement come from.
Is opennet more secure than having 4 friends?
Opennet is probably more secure than having only 1 friend
gt;
> PHYSICAL THREAT LEVEL:
>
> How concerned are you about your computer being physically seized and
> examined?
>
> HIGH: I am concerned. Freenet will use additional hard drive encryption.
>
> LOW: I am not concerned. Freenet will use only basic encryption.
>
>
> theo
&
encryption.
theo
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
choosing between Freenet and
Tor, because they do different things.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Friday 15 August 2008 00:42, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> What is the point in that? If they are intent on using Freenet, then
>> forcing them to select an inappropriate option doesn't make them any
>> more secure! The q
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2008 20:01, Ian Clarke wrote:
> What do you think of my changes?
>
> "We strongly recommend that you only use Freenet in darknet mode [are we using
> the term "darknet" consistentl
- what kind of resource do we assume he has access to?
Fine, but we need to infer these things by asking the user simple
questions that they will understand and answer correctly.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
lame us if it stops working when your government blocks it, if your peers
> can tell what you are browsing, if the Bad Guys come and get you!
>
> ___
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: ian at uprizer.com
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> I have finished to integrate SVN to mantis: here are the magic keywords:
>
> $g_source_control_regexp = '/\b(?:bug|issue)\s*[#]{0,1}(\d+)\b/i';
> $g_source_control_fixed_regexp =
>
Sounds good to me.
Ian.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to get rid of some steps in the wizard; At the moment we
> have the following:
>
>private enum WIZARD_STEP {
>WELCOME,
>OPENNET,
>
Sounds good to me.
Ian.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to get rid of some steps in the wizard; At the moment we
have the following:
private enum WIZARD_STEP {
WELCOME,
OPENNET,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have finished to integrate SVN to mantis: here are the magic keywords:
$g_source_control_regexp = '/\b(?:bug|issue)\s*[#]{0,1}(\d+)\b/i';
$g_source_control_fixed_regexp =
Guys come and get you!
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
kind of resource do we assume he has access to?
Fine, but we need to infer these things by asking the user simple
questions that they will understand and answer correctly.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 August 2008 20:01, Ian Clarke wrote:
What do you think of my changes?
We strongly recommend that you only use Freenet in darknet mode [are we using
the term darknet consistently? we can't force darknet
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 00:42, Ian Clarke wrote:
What is the point in that? If they are intent on using Freenet, then
forcing them to select an inappropriate option doesn't make them any
more secure! The question
and
Tor, because they do different things.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
CEO, Uprizer Labs
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: +1 512 422 3588
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 August 2008 14:04, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Matthew Toseland
>> > Why? It's just one more point of failure, isn't it?
>>
>> Yeah, Google is really likely to fai
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> > > And almost everyone subscribes to the mailing list.
> >
> > That doesn't mean that everyone finds it easy to trawl through
> > comments interspersed with file diffs. I know change is traumatic,
> > but anything we can do to make it
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 August 2008 13:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> So I've given up on getting people to use CodeCollaborator, but
>> fortunately Google Code now has a free code review tool that perhaps
>> people will want
So I've given up on getting people to use CodeCollaborator, but
fortunately Google Code now has a free code review tool that perhaps
people will want to try - it has *got* to be better than the current
approach of reading through and replying to diff emails manually.
Details are here:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:44 PM, wrote:
>public Identity getIdentityByURI(FreenetURI uri) {
>
> + String searched = uri.toString().substring(0,
> uri.toString().indexOf("/"));
>Identity identity = null;
>
>// This is ugly, I could not find
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
public Identity getIdentityByURI(FreenetURI uri) {
+ String searched = uri.toString().substring(0,
uri.toString().indexOf(/));
Identity identity = null;
// This is ugly, I could
So I've given up on getting people to use CodeCollaborator, but
fortunately Google Code now has a free code review tool that perhaps
people will want to try - it has *got* to be better than the current
approach of reading through and replying to diff emails manually.
Details are here:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 13:06, Ian Clarke wrote:
So I've given up on getting people to use CodeCollaborator, but
fortunately Google Code now has a free code review tool that perhaps
people will want to try - it has
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And almost everyone subscribes to the mailing list.
That doesn't mean that everyone finds it easy to trawl through
comments interspersed with file diffs. I know change is traumatic,
but anything we can do to
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 14:04, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Matthew Toseland
Why? It's just one more point of failure, isn't it?
Yeah, Google is really likely to fail.
Google will do
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> No I have _not_ missed the point. If you map each key onto the rim of a
> circle and
> average resulting the x and y coords of all the keys you get an average in a
> circular
> keyspace. Try it.
>
> If fact radius of the averaged x, y will
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I have _not_ missed the point. If you map each key onto the rim of a
circle and
average resulting the x and y coords of all the keys you get an average in a
circular
keyspace. Try it.
If fact radius of the averaged
enet and will review it as the bugbasket that it is. This will not
> be a positive review, I'm afraid.
>
> Regards,
>
> Don Lee
> ungoth.com
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Please email this mailing list for support:
>>
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Thursday 31 July 2008 17:42, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> IMHO the problem is location churn. The solution is for opennet nodes not to
> swap. But we need simulations before we can deploy that. Which Vive promised
> to do...
Why would
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2008 17:42, Florent Daignière wrote:
IMHO the problem is location churn. The solution is for opennet nodes not to
swap. But we need simulations before we can deploy that. Which Vive promised
to do...
that it is. This will not
be a positive review, I'm afraid.
Regards,
Don Lee
ungoth.com
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Don,
Please email this mailing list for support:
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support/
Regards,
Ian
I remain concerned about our installation process for 0.8. It is
obviously critical that someone can get from visiting our website, to
running and using Freenet, as easily as possible.
Can anyone do some usability testing with this? This would involve
finding someone that hasn't installed or
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> Can anyone think about some other mitigation measure we could use?
> Is anyone willing to run some simulations and find out the magic-values
> we are going to use in the mitigation algorithm?
How about we don't route more than 30% (or
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone think about some other mitigation measure we could use?
Is anyone willing to run some simulations and find out the magic-values
we are going to use in the mitigation algorithm?
How about we don't route more
I remain concerned about our installation process for 0.8. It is
obviously critical that someone can get from visiting our website, to
running and using Freenet, as easily as possible.
Can anyone do some usability testing with this? This would involve
finding someone that hasn't installed or
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Volodya
wrote:
> I think that if people approach it as a P2P network then they will expect it
> to
> take a couple of minutes. Last time i have used gnutella that's about how long
> it takes to start the thing up there 2-5 minutes...
Who uses gnutella these
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008 14:12, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> I shut down my opennet node overnight, and have just restarted it, it
>> took over 5 minutes before it successfully re-established a connection
>> to another nod
I shut down my opennet node overnight, and have just restarted it, it
took over 5 minutes before it successfully re-established a connection
to another node. This really isn't acceptable - surely it doesn't
take 5 minutes for the node to figure out that none of its existing
connections are valid
I shut down my opennet node overnight, and have just restarted it, it
took over 5 minutes before it successfully re-established a connection
to another node. This really isn't acceptable - surely it doesn't
take 5 minutes for the node to figure out that none of its existing
connections are valid
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2008 14:12, Ian Clarke wrote:
I shut down my opennet node overnight, and have just restarted it, it
took over 5 minutes before it successfully re-established a connection
to another node. This really
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Volodya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that if people approach it as a P2P network then they will expect it
to
take a couple of minutes. Last time i have used gnutella that's about how long
it takes to start the thing up there 2-5 minutes...
Who uses
Thanks for the feedback.
You are right that Freenet currently uses way too much CPU, although
Toad tells me that he has done quite a bit of CPU profiling to try to
track down this problem. I'd be interested in his latest findings in
this regard.
What you are describing is basically a "callback"
Thanks for the feedback.
You are right that Freenet currently uses way too much CPU, although
Toad tells me that he has done quite a bit of CPU profiling to try to
track down this problem. I'd be interested in his latest findings in
this regard.
What you are describing is basically a callback
Sounds great Cole, I'm on the road just now but am looking forward to
checking it out as soon as I can,
Ian.
On 7/5/08, Cole Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey developers of freenet!
I'm sorry it took me so long to get this message out -- i've had quite
the busy summer. As some (few :x) of
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:23 PM, NextGen$ wrote:
> Most of them don't know how to categorize bugs, not to
> mention they don't look for duplicates.
Fine, but having them email the support mailing list before filing the
bug is a far less efficient way to deal with these problems than just
making
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:23 PM, NextGen$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of them don't know how to categorize bugs, not to
mention they don't look for duplicates.
Fine, but having them email the support mailing list before filing the
bug is a far less efficient way to deal with these problems
1001 - 1100 of 3893 matches
Mail list logo
