o the silent #freenet-refs.
If anyone here wants to send my their noderef mine can be found at:
http://dark-code.bulix.org/1cry7p-9685
Also, is there a text based installer available? I have a headless
machine at a colo that I would like to run a node on.
--
Tracy R Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
.
If anyone here wants to send my their noderef mine can be found at:
http://dark-code.bulix.org/1cry7p-9685
Also, is there a text based installer available? I have a headless
machine at a colo that I would like to run a node on.
--
Tracy R Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
tant anyway.
--
Tracy R Reed http://ultraviolet.org
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-
On 6/11/06, Robin Monks wrote:
>> FreExchange, NowFree, GoFree, BFree, FreeFile, FreeSwap
>>
I would instead suggest NowFreedom, GoFreedom, BFreedom, FreedomFile, etc.
We should learn from the FSF's problems. Free is overloaded and Freedom
is much more important anyway.
e explanation:
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2004/12/12/rest-to-my-wife
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer
All based on this doctoral thesis:
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/abstract.htm
--
Tracy R Reed
ht
e explanation:
http://naeblis.cx/rtomayko/2004/12/12/rest-to-my-wife
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer
All based on this doctoral thesis:
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/abstract.htm
--
Tracy R Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +, Toad spake thusly:
> Nah, anonymity is fundamental to Freenet. However, for testing MAJOR
> changes such as are likely to be needed, something like this may be
> useful.
Sure it's fundamental but I still think simpler systems are easier to
debug. For examp
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:02:21AM +, Toad spake thusly:
> What do people think of this suggestion? Would you be willing to run a
> 'drone' node (or two)?
Yes. I think anonymity was introduced WAY too early into freenet anyhow.
Best to get one thing working at a time.
--
Tracy Reed
http://co
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:04:28PM -0500, Zlatin Balevsky spake thusly:
> a) I would run a node without anonimity and let the devs get all info
> they want, and would stick around to assist them
A.
--
Tracy Reed
http://copilotconsulting.com
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> How are you measuring specialization? If you are looking at your data store
> than I would say you never were specialized. However ether way, you aren't
> now. So, yes, we should do whatever we can to encourage this. IE:
Wh
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 04:58:01PM +0100, Niklas Bergh spake thusly:
> > Why would an established specialized node de-specialize?
>
> Good question.. I am basing that theory on the fact that tessiers
> (month-long+ ?) forced datastore specialization ought to have affected the
> networks opinion on
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:21:15AM -0500, Ken Corson spake thusly:
> a node's specialization changes over time. The larger our table
Why? Does it really need to? It seems like with more than a dozen or two
nodes in the network there is no good real reason for a node to change is
specialization. Fo
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:11:39AM -0500, Edward J. Huff spake thusly:
> Can anyone tell me why big routing tables won't help routing?
Can you tell us why they will help it? jrand0m was expounding on how
smaller routing tables should help routing earlier today.
> be possible to run with a huge r
Running node 6340
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 1023 (593/430/1024)
Connections transferring (Transmitting/Receiving) 394 (377/17)
Data waiting to be transfered 270 MiB
Total amount of data transferred1,268 MiB
That's a lot of data
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +, Jonathan Howard spake thusly:
> I think freenet is suffering because it doesn't have key space
> specialisation. NGR is trying to route quickly, all un-overload are
Yep.
> speed. Don't know how to kick start it out of the current state though.
> The on
java version "1.4.1_02"
Linux mail 2.4.21 #2 Sat Jul 5 02:55:33 PDT 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Runs for around 30 minutes and then segfaults. It has done this 3 times in
a row so it seems quite repeatable. I've been running every dev version up
until this one with no unusual problems or segfaults.
--
T
This claim turned out to be rather premature didn't it? What does your
graph look like after a number of hours of operation? Why would one run
their node for 1500 keys (a few minutes on a fast connection) and then
proclaim freenet fixed based on such a small sample?
--
Tracy Reed
http://copilotco
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:15:01PM -0600, Brandon Low spake thusly:
> > > Why does the node so often freeze while healing FEC?
> >
> > It does? Haven't heard of that one before... what do you mean by freeze?
> Never finishes... the node keeps running but it sits there saying it is
> FEC decoding f
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:45:25AM +, Toad spake thusly:
> That is not a solution. Frost works, somebody would reimplement it, we
> have no enforcement capability against them, and if frost died now
> somebody would reintroduce it post 1.0 and mess up a network adapted to
> no Frost. We need to
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:42:02AM +, Toad spake thusly:
> > that's fine but I rather expected a bit more. :) My psuccess is slowly
> > creaping up (it was .02% for so long) so hopefully it's just a matter of
>
> Are you sure that's % ? 0.02% = 0.0002...
Oops, you are right. Should be .02 or
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:41:23AM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> When and who "scoffed"? Quotes please. I was carefully picking through
> the NGR code and encouraging others to do-so. The scientific method is
> to conduct an experiment, and see whether things improve. To the extent
> a s
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:12:33PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> > If you expect only a .08% psuccess
>
> How do you know that 92% of requests aren't for data that isn't in the
> network.
You are implying that frost is the cause of this? If that's the case I
think the frost project has to di
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:41:45PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> With NGR finally starting to meet expectations, we need to think about
> what lies between now and our 0.6 release.
If you expect only a .08% psuccess and barely a hint of specialization
that's fine but I rather expected a bit m
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:55:52PM +, Toad spake thusly:
> Well, how much of this is the built in freenet slowness, and how much of
> it is the browser being configured wrong? The infamous can't load more
Given that my browser is configured correctly and I have a fast cpu and
pipe and given th
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:37:27PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive
> criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be
> enhanced. Topics include installation, FProxy, even the website's layout.
The first thin
When a splitfile download finishes it often has a tendency to hang on "FEC
decoding missing data blocks... this may take a while; please be patient."
seemingly forever. I know this is a known bug to some but I'm not sure if
everyone knows about it.
When I try to cancel the download (usually while
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 05:44:43PM -0500, Nick Tarleton spake thusly:
> > Right now with
> > the totally random routing due to no specialization freenet can only store
> > as much retrievable data as 25*n where n is the average size of the
> > datastores on freenet and 25 is the current max htl. No
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:54:11AM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> No, optimally every node caches everything and there is no
> specialization whatsoever.
But this greatly reduces the total data storage capacity of the network to
just the average size of one datastore.
--
Tracy Reed
http://c
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 01:40:34AM +, Toad spake thusly:
> How exactly did the script work? The store directories are not based on
> the beginning of the key, which is used for specialization purposes.
I iterate over every keyfile in the ds, look at the name of the file, and
if I have already
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:16:40AM -0500, Ed Tomlinson spake thusly:
> Think the routing bug could easily have caused this. Think about it. We
> we using the worst path. So data would follow this. Once a node got
Yes, I agree. However I am concerned that I am not even seeing signs of
recovery
I'm glad that major routing bug was squashed. Well done! But I think there
is yet one more big thinko somewhere...
It seems that the network is not learning who specializes in what areas of
the keyspace from successful and failed requests. For a number of weeks
now I have been running my node with
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 02:08:20PM +0100, Niklas Bergh spake thusly:
> I am pretty sure that toad will do this for any coming stable builds.
> Hopefully stable releases will be re-indroduced soon :)
But please, let's not make the same mistakes of the past. Don't call it
stable unless you are going
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:59:29PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> 1. Try to get a big enough NGR-only test network for routing to actually
> take place, and test that. Drawbacks: difficult to compare performance
> between networks, would need at least 200 nodes to demonstrate routing.
>
> 2. Merge im
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:28:45PM +0100, Dave Hooper spake thusly:
> The reason most often given is that several of the developers use an email
> client where this isn't necessary and in fact is discouraged (i.e. Mutt).
I have used mutt for years and it has never occurred to me that it
encourages
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> Right, so we encrypt it with a one-time key for each file, which we
> never write to disk - we lose the cache on shutdown. One more reason
You have to make sure it never gets swapped out too. Fred sucks huge
amounts of RAM quite often.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 08:29:10PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> is so damaging. And for various other reasons it seems a network
> fork/reset would not be a bad thing at this point in time.
For what it's worth I agree completely. Let's not be afraid to break some
eggs and move forward. Freenet is s
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> Since Freesites are placed on the gateway page to allow people to find
> freesites more easily, we should probably drop YoYo now that he has
> deliberately crippled his site to promote a network split.
Now this seems a bit chil
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:27:16AM -0700, Tracy R Reed spake thusly:
> FIW doesn't work. I believe this is a known bug and being worked on.
Also, Frost doesn't seem to upload nearly as fast as fproxy. I don't know if it
is related to the fcp bug but it is odd.
-
The good news:
I inserted most of an ISO at 28k/s. So inserts seem to be mostly working.
The bad news:
The above mentioned insert seemed to hang with 2 blocks remaining on
segment 4 out of 5. I eventually restarted my node so it wasn't able to
finish. Now I get to try re-inserting. It would be
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:19:16AM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier spake thusly:
> Noticed this just now on YoYo's new sites listing:
Don't worry, if and when 6226 leads to a new stable build (and I mean
*really* stable, not just more stable than unstable maybe sometimes) there
will be great incentive t
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:51:58AM -0700, Mike Stump spake thusly:
> The good news, I've been up for 1 hour 51 minutes, so far the load
> seems to be holding stable (78% idle, instead of 0)... it hasn't
> crashed the jvm yet, knock on wood... and the data waiting to go out
> isn't increasing in a
Oct 8, 2003 2:16:07 AM (freenet.node.states.data.SendData, QThread-23194,
ERROR): Unexpected exception java.lang.NullPointerException in SendData
Sending Data @ 9f2a3d5e36dcd1e: 9f2a3d5e36dcd1e/7fb4ad86d443f58e:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], in=Key:
98b1a787cdfc241a46bfe304cab6f3d8611c6045120302 Buffer:
[EMAI
6223, linux, latest Sun jvm, etc.
While trying to insert..
Oct 8, 2003 1:57:46 AM (freenet.PeerPacketMessage, write interface
thread, ERROR): notifySuccess on
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:InsertRequest{Close=false,Sustain=false,DataLength=0,{HopsToLive=17,Source.signature=d39d63e7944a6cbec9e2b913134f5746
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > * A list of nodes with have granted FProxy access to
> > dodo.freenetproject.org (212.13.198.248) that will reliably be running
> > the prod build
Woohoo! Very glad to
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:11:12AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> Yes, I got that. However in order to represent an aria of fast responce, you
> need to be using at least three of those points. In reality perhaps four or
> more. If that is the case, NGrouting is not well suited for multiple
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:13:50PM -0700, Pelliom spake thusly:
> same time, with the same datastore? In this way, the availability of
> content on the development network would be the same as on the stable
> network, which presumably would give a better test bed. Would running
Good idea in concep
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:31:36PM -0700, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> Freenet is a research project, always has been. If people find that its
Wow, that's rather shocking. I'm totally serious. My impression was that
it was trying to be a real anonymous publication system suitable for
actual use in
The developers need to decide whether freenet is ready for general use or
not. They have led a lot of people to have some expectation of usefulness
despite the fact that it is clearly alpha software yet they have a release
called "stable". I suspect part of the problem is major bugs in
implementat
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Rudi Cilibrasi spake thusly:
> yet the device is set to only allow reading if you look at the
> perms. This makes sense, as really only the kernel is supposed to
> add random bits to the entropy pool last time I checked how this
> pseudo device is supposed
open("/dev/urandom", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0666) = -1 EACCES
(Permission denied)
Why does java/freenet access /dev/urandom? And why is it being denied?
Perms look ok...
cr--r--r--1 root root 1, 9 Jul 20 06:43 /dev/urandom
And what is it hurting that it can't open
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:23:53PM -0700, Todd Walton spake thusly:
> Well, something to consider is: Are we sure nodes really need to
> specialize, as things are? Maybe there's a lot more disk space out there
> than there is stuff to fill it? In that case, there'd be little need to
> dump ol
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:14:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
> dont *remove* the line as fred fixes missing configuration parameters, such as
> bwlimiting values, with *default* values, which are 10 KB/sec IIRC
> rather use a rather high value for the bwlimits, such as 99 to enabl
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:50:40AM -0700, Tracy R Reed spake thusly:
> Last good build should ALWAYS be CURRENT_BUILD - 1. This way brand new
> nodes will have someone to talk to but we will only be talking to the most
Well, I finally got javac installed on my machine. It wasn't near
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:04:52AM +0200, Niklas Bergh spake thusly:
> 1MB/minute translates to about 12kbyte/s which is close to the default
> outbound bwlimit. Are you sure that you have set outboundBandwidthLimit to 0
> in all the nodes config files?
Yes, I did go through all of the conf files
I've been holding off on sending this email for ages but I'm sitting here
for the zillionth time looking an insert that is going nowhere preventing
me from inserting the kind of legal and legitimate content that freenet
needs to survive and my frustration level is getting the better of me.
I've bee
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:57:56PM -0500, Salah Coronya spake thusly:
> Sep 28, 2003 8:15:22 AM (freenet.node.Main, main, ERROR): Skipped bad
> NodeReference while reading seed nodes
> freenet.node.BadReferenceException: NodeReference self signature check
> failed.
I have this and I saw someone on
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:43:59AM +0100, Gordan spake thusly:
> Agreed. However, a patch to the MTA would be required to give it a different
> mechanism for look-ups, e.g. one that looks up from a text file. Either that,
> or we would need a DNS proxy that would do that for the MTA, but this wou
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:04:39PM -0700, Todd Walton spake thusly:
> It'd be brownie points for your business, if you could pull it off.
Problem is it would have to be done anonymously or someone could DoS the
business or personal website of whoever did it. So it would have to be
done without the
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:27:19PM -0700, pineapple spake thusly:
> After giving some thought to this, I think the best
> way to deal with this is by changing the nature of how
> email is distributed. I don't think blacklists, even
> on freenet is the right answer. The solution to spam
> is to mo
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:06:38PM +1000, fish spake thusly:
> Yes, just what we need, an RBL list that is even less fucking accountable.
>
> This has 'bad idea' written all over it.
Not at all. The people who implement the RBL list on their email are the
ones to be held accountable. If you aren'
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:31:55PM -0500, Pascal spake thusly:
> Interesting story on Slashdot today. I wonder how hard it would be to
> implement in Freenet?
>
> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/24/132216
Not hard at all and I think it is an excellent idea. The big issue is you
woul
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:09:40AM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> Wrong. Total bullshit. A 12 year old kiddie can DoS an address IF HE HAS
> OR CAN ACQUIRE MORE BANDWIDTH THAN THE TARGET. Otherwise the internet
> would have been completely destroyed aeons ago.
I think you are coming on just a bit too
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Benny Amorsen spake thusly:
> Right now freenet is most commonly downloaded from a non-secure site,
> just authenticated by a non-secure DNS lookup. Most people use the
> precompiled jar file, and even the source-compiled one fetches binary
> stuff to put i
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:20:50AM +0200, Some Guy spake thusly:
> What trust issues? It should be impossible to
> download a faulty build from such a freesite, since
> the whole site would be certified by the private key.
And if the key is compromised and a trojan build put in place?
Those tru
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:28:49AM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier spake thusly:
> /** Oldest build of Fred we will talk to */
> public static final int lastGoodBuild = 654; // jan 20; ARK insert fixes
>
> And yet, I see node versions earlier than this in my routing table.
Hmm...any chance we c
I'm looking at my node versions histogram and I notice that around 80% of
the nodes in my routing table at the moment are 5028 nodes. A few days ago
I noticed half of the nodes were 6200 series nodes and I think my node
might have been performing better. Would it be possible to make the node
prefer
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:25:51PM -0400, Hrair Mekhsian spake thusly:
> It doesn't have to be like that MS loading bar. You can put real
> information on that page, instead of faking a progress bar that represents
> nothing.
We keep forgetting that when freenet is working correctly it won't ta
I am running 6194 on Linux with Sun's latest jvm. I have been noticing
something odd about inserts. Lately I have been trying to insert a 130M
file. The insert runs for a while, inserts a dozen blocks, then seems to
hang. I let it sit there for a good while and it makes no progress. I
eventually ca
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:31:44AM -0400, Edward J. Huff spake thusly:
> Unfortunately, it seems that Freenet is rarely mentioned without an
> immediate mention of "illegal content." ...
What do you expect? fproxy links to it!
--
Tracy Reed
http://copilotconsulting.com
pgp0.pgp
Descriptio
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Gordan spake thusly:
> Global mean traffic (queries per hour):8673.0444
> Local mean traffic (queries per hour): 203160.27088036117
I have noticed ludicrously high local mean traffic figures also and I
think it is a bug. I just don't see how 203kqp
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:58:12PM -0700, Todd Walton spake thusly:
> "It crashed. This is the message I got."
Isn't that crash dump stuff supposed to be designed to tell them
everything they need to aid them in their debugging procesS?
--
Tracy Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
pgp0.pgp
Descri
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> NGRouting, and a lot of infrastructure work and some major bugfixes, has
> been merged into the unstable branch, in build 6163. So that it can have
Just so you know I'm running 6163 and still getting RNF's regularly. Not
sure what othe
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:34:07PM -0400, Andrew Rodland spake thusly:
> I already mentioned that in the original post. Caching is not really a
> problem. Routing appears to be, though.
The lack of security in your proposal is the even bigger problem.
--
Tracy Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:45:19PM -0400, Andrew Rodland spake thusly:
> What this is, is an idea for decreasing the number of nodes that data passes
> through on freenet, and so also freenet's bandwidth usage. It would not be a
> compatible change, but it's just an idea. :)
There is a very good
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:08:18AM -0700, gnutella fan spake thusly:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/32567.html
I don't get it. What's to stop the Iranian govt from blocking access to
anonymizer?
> Mostly unfettered. Like the Iranian filters, the U.S. service blocks porn
> sites -- "Th
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 05:24:20PM -0700, Tracy R Reed spake thusly:
> I can do a lot better:
Oh, and time of day was around 4pm PDT. 23:00 Zulu I believe.
--
Tracy Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
D
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 07:30:48PM -0400, Dominic Anello spake thusly:
> 2. psucess_data:
> Probability of success of an incoming request
> Aug 28, 2003 7:23:37 PM
> 0 | 0.042312525
> 1 | 0.03726102
> 2 | 0.042833265
> 3 | 0.039161727
> 4 | 0.03750536
> 5 | 0.03806081
> 6 | 0.038910504
> 7 | 0.0380
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:54:33PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> And can be taken down, or go bust for no apparent reason, at any time.
I'm archiving everything at ultraviolet.org also, for my own reference and
for the convenience of the community. I tend to archive all of the lists I
subscribe just
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:11:20PM -0400, Mail Administrator spake thusly:
> This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Why are we getting so many bounces back to the list? Something is clearly
misconfigured.
--
Tracy Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 06:20:45AM +0100, Gordan spake thusly:
> Has anybody else noticed similar behaviour? What has gone into Fred around the
> 6149/6150 mark that could explain this?
I was told nobody knows because they throw too much new code in with each
build. Seems kinda silly to me but it
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:21:48AM -0400, Tim McGrath spake thusly:
> So, basically reiser3 is unusuable by mostly anyone who doesn't want
> high cpu usage for their filesystem. Hell, it nearly *crippled* my poor
> demented 486 when I tried using it on it. But, that's a single case -
> however it d
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:28:23PM -0700, Jim McCoy spake thusly:
> 1) What is a KB of storage, bandwidth, or a unit of CPU power actually
> worth? You can't just cost out what it would take to buy the equivalent
Indeed, this stuff is no basis for a stable currency. Is there any way
that r
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:25:45PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen spake thusly:
> The watchme network. Nodes that have set watchme=true in their config
> file report the requests and inserts that they route to a central
If we ever bring back watchme I will be sure to run one. I have always
felt like the c
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:35:21AM -0700, Hot Stuff spake thusly:
> really so? If a node has knowledge of the internal freenet as well as the
> external Freenet, it'll end up asking for data from both, but only the
> internal one is going to have the data.
I suspect KSK's from things like frost
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 06:47:11PM +0100, Gordan Bobic spake thusly:
> It is the money laundering aspect that is problematic at the "link" point.
> Coming up with a secure and anonymous on-line cash-token exchange protocol is
> quite simple.
Now, if a bank in the Caymans which does not report th
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:28:22PM -0700, pineapple spake thusly:
> distributed nature. It's possible that IBM management
> is not aware of the Freenet Project and would be
> interested in learning about the project and
> supporting it financially.
Unless you get very lucky any company putting mo
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:34:04AM -0700, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
> Its worth noting that NGRouting improves this situation quite
> dramatically. We still have to rely on local information, but we can
> much more effectively use that local information to guage the impact of
> local changes to
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:16:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
> If there's interest in the community, I can set up a massive VMWare test box without
> too much trouble. Any ideas how to manage it?
Or a massive user mode Linux box. But I don't see why you can't just run
the thing on a
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:03:40PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> By the way, what does that DO? I tried it once or twice, I didn't have any
> problems, but I can't say I noticed anything different ether.
I always run with -server. It's supposed to enable just in time compiling
(iirc) which
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 08:21:38PM -0400, Greg Wooledge spake thusly:
> You could use OS-level firewalling to prevent the nodes from talking to
> anything that's not on the LAN.
Better to just hack fred not to use nodes outside the local LAN and give
that series it's own version number series so i
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 01:30:10PM +0200, Devl Peter spake thusly:
> I've read the xmule documentation and set up
> the firewall. This is needed for freenet also,
> unless one is so braindead to surf the net
> without a firewall. xmule tells you if your
Actually, I think firewalls are highly overr
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:16:01PM +0200, Some Guy spake thusly:
> Consider a random peice of data sitting on my node.
> None of my 100 neighbors know it's there. Now imagine
If routing works properly the odds of this happening are very slim. Data
should get routed to nodes where the rest of th
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:16:39PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> Ok, why does everyone act as though NGrouting is going to be the Holy Grail.
Because we are all frustrated that performance has only gotten worse over
the last year and are really really really hoping that things will get
bet
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Gordan spake thusly:
> Similarly pkzip is no easier or more difficult to use than tar or bzip2.
Exactly. And since they are the same we may as well pick the one with the
best performance.
--
Tracy Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
pgp0.pgp
Descript
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:44:40PM -0500, Richard Reveley spake thusly:
> saved, I don't care about CPU cycles used, all I care about is ease of
> use and that would add unnecesary layers of complexity. It seems that
bzip is just as easy to use as gzip. They work exactly the same. What's
the pro
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:04:13PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> That is all well and good, however it does not give us any way of insuring
> that nodes that have a fast connection to each other on the underlying
> network will be any more likely to share a similar specialization. I can
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:01:52PM +0100, Gordan spake thusly:
> Call me skeptical, but I think this is an amazingly bad idea. It removes any
I agree. It is a nasty bandaid which does not solve the real problem of
simply making the network perform properly and only offers a distraction.
> One as
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:19:14AM -0400, Greg Wooledge spake thusly:
> No, because it would have to run as root (superuser) in order to be
> able to change the system time.
You don't have to change the system time. Let fred maintain it's own time.
It check check with the ntp server, note by how m
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 09:46:31PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> 1. Warn users to make sure their date/time is set correctly.
Since nodes are going to be talking to each other anyway is there any way
to distribute a time sync within freenet itself similar to ntp? Fred can't
reset the system
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Toad spake thusly:
> We cannot make a non-sun-dependant Freenet. You cannot make a package
So much for decentralized!
--
Tracy Reed
http://ultraviolet.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
