On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:09:53 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> Can you make a link to another languages? (Like french wiki.) See
> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2915
If people are interested in translating the website we can serve different
content for different languages. So
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:09:53 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
Can you make a link to another languages? (Like french wiki.) See
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2915
If people are interested in translating the website we can serve different
content for different languages. So far
Can you make a link to another languages? (Like french wiki.) See
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2915
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:40:18 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:40:18 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771:
> > Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites)
>
> This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and
> at
> the same time tells them why
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771:
> Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites)
This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and at
the same time tells them why we use it (what's the difference between a
freesite and a normal website).
Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
>>> Toseland wrote:
>>>
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
>> Toseland wrote:
>>
>>> I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
>>> We use the new background and the new logo, but we waste a
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Cl?ment wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> about three weeks ago I had a HCI webproject to do.
> The subject was : improve an existant website (well, I'm not 100% sure that
> it
> was the subject, but that what we've done)
>
> I convinced the three other people who worked
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771:
Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites)
This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and at
the same time tells them why we use it (what's the difference between a
freesite and a normal website).
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:40:18 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771:
Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites)
This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and
at
the same time tells them why we use
Can you make a link to another languages? (Like french wiki.) See
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2915
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:40:18 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009
Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 19:52:32 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Okay. The homepage now says:
> ' Freenet is free software which lets you anonymously share files, browse
> and publish web sites, and chat on forums, without fear of censorship.
> Users are anonymous, and Freenet is entirely
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 19:12:52 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
> >> Toseland wrote:
> >> > I have done the first phase of deploying this, after
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> > I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
> > We use the new background and the new logo, but we waste a lot of space on
> > the top "line" with
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
>> Toseland wrote:
>> > I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
>> > We use the new background and the new
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 01:14:24 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Cl?ment wrote:
> > [...]
>
> I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
> We use the new background and the new logo, but we waste a lot of space on
> the top "line" with
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
We use the new background and the new logo, but we waste a lot of space on
the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 19:52:32 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Okay. The homepage now says:
' Freenet is free software which lets you anonymously share files, browse
and publish web sites, and chat on forums, without fear of censorship.
Users are anonymous, and Freenet is entirely
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 19:12:52 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
Hello all,
about three weeks ago I had a HCI webproject to do.
The subject was : improve an existant website (well, I'm not 100% sure that
it
was the subject, but that what we've done)
I convinced the three other people who worked with me
Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
We use the new background and the new logo, but
Evan Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 03:18:47 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the first phase of
Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2009 21:53:58 schrieb Evan Daniel:
> I don't know. I don't see such an option in WP, but I don't know much
> about the underlying software.
To have a safe wiki it would also be posible to follow the path the GNU/Hurd
took: Have a wiki with DVCS backend.
That way has a few
Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2009 21:53:58 schrieb Evan Daniel:
I don't know. I don't see such an option in WP, but I don't know much
about the underlying software.
To have a safe wiki it would also be posible to follow the path the GNU/Hurd
took: Have a wiki with DVCS backend.
That way has a few
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
Hello all,
about three weeks ago I had a HCI webproject to do.
The subject was : improve an existant website (well, I'm not 100% sure that
it
was the subject, but that what we've done)
I convinced the three other people who worked with me
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 01:14:24 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
[...]
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian.
We use the new background and the new logo, but we waste a lot of space on
the top line with the banner,
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:17:23 you wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:18:50 you wrote:
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a
lot of content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is
better, and arguably even if it isn't better it's a
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
I have done the first phase of deploying this, after discussions with Ian. We
use the new background and the new logo, but we waste a lot of space on the
top line with the banner, and we don't use the horizontal
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:01:18 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
> Toseland wrote:
> > Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a
> > lot of content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is
> > better, and arguably even
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a lot of
content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is better, and
arguably even if it isn't better it's a change, and is no worse...
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Cl?ment wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> about
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:01:18 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
>> Toseland wrote:
>> > Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a
>> > lot of content and it's not well
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a lot
> of content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is better, and
> arguably even if it isn't better it's a change, and is no worse...
>
> On
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a lot of
content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is better, and
arguably even if it isn't better it's a change, and is no worse...
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
Hello all,
about three
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a lot
of content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is better, and
arguably even if it isn't better it's a change, and is
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:01:18 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a
lot of content and it's not well organised. And arguably the theme is
better,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:01:18 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Probably worth moving forward on this? Submenus are important, we have a
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO the above is totally unrealistic.
Does that settle the Progress bar question?
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
* clement [2009-06-02 18:46:38]:
> Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a ?crit :
> > clement wrote:
> > > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> > >> Would you be
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a ?crit :
> clement wrote:
> > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
> >> Nice!
> >>
> >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> >> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
> >
> >
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:46:38 clement wrote:
> Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a ?crit :
> > clement wrote:
> > > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> > >>
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> of the year we are not.
I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 16:29:31 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> > period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> > of the year we
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:32:33 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Cl?ment wrote:
> > Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
> > homepage, between the download link and the news (we got rid of it
> > because we found on the moment it wasn't
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 15:08:22 xor wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:32:33 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Cl?ment wrote:
> > > Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
> > > homepage, between the download link and the news (we got rid of
clement wrote:
> Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit :
>> Nice!
>>
>> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
>> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
> Nextgens is currently working on the website (sorry again), and I don't have
>
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Cl?ment wrote:
>
> Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
> homepage,
> between the download link and the news (we got rid of it because we found on
> the moment it wasn't relevant, but in fact, it's interesting to know about
> the
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez ?crit?:
> Nice!
>
> We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
> Would you be interested in continuing this work?
Nextgens is currently working on the website (sorry again), and I don't have
much time right now. So I
clement wrote:
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be interested in continuing this work?
Nextgens is currently working on the website (sorry again), and I don't have
much time
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:32:33 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
homepage, between the download link and the news (we got rid of it
because we found on the moment it wasn't relevant,
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 15:08:22 xor wrote:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:32:33 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
homepage, between the download link and the news (we got rid of it
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
of the year we are not.
I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 16:29:31 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
of the year we are
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit :
clement wrote:
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be interested in continuing this work?
Nextgens is currently
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 17:46:38 clement wrote:
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit :
clement wrote:
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
IMHO the above is totally unrealistic.
Does that settle the Progress bar question?
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
* clement cvol...@gmail.com [2009-06-02 18:46:38]:
Le mardi 02 juin 2009 12:05:14, Florent Daigniere a écrit :
clement wrote:
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be interested in continuing this work?
Ian.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Cl?ment wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> about three weeks ago I had a HCI webproject to do.
> The subject was : improve an existant website
Hello!
I wish you get a good grade for your work:)
My first-time thoughts:
- I really like the background, it makes the whole site much more modern.
- The 80% width feels boxed. It should be 90-95%
- When navigating, I more like to see all the submenus, not just when
clicked on a heading. So
Hello all,
about three weeks ago I had a HCI webproject to do.
The subject was : improve an existant website (well, I'm not 100% sure that it
was the subject, but that what we've done)
I convinced the three other people who worked with me to work on the freenet
website. It was a small project
Hello!
I wish you get a good grade for your work:)
My first-time thoughts:
- I really like the background, it makes the whole site much more modern.
- The 80% width feels boxed. It should be 90-95%
- When navigating, I more like to see all the submenus, not just when
clicked on a heading. So
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be interested in continuing this work?
Ian.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Clément cvol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
about three weeks ago I had a HCI webproject to do.
The subject was : improve an
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 21:38:36 Ian Clarke, vous avez écrit :
Nice!
We're actually planning to migrate the website to another provider.
Would you be interested in continuing this work?
Nextgens is currently working on the website (sorry again), and I don't have
much time right now. So I think
On Monday 01 June 2009 01:24:24 Clément wrote:
Oh, and I almost forgot : we should keep the financial status on the
homepage,
between the download link and the news (we got rid of it because we found on
the moment it wasn't relevant, but in fact, it's interesting to know about
the
64 matches
Mail list logo
