[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-31 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 31 August 2009 01:02:09 Evan Daniel wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Matthew >> Toseland wrote: >> > On Thursday 27 August 2009 20:01:19 Evan Daniel wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew >> >> Toseland

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-31 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Monday 31 August 2009 01:02:09 Evan Daniel wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Thursday 27 August 2009 20:01:19 Evan Daniel wrote: On Thu, Aug 27,

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-30 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 27 August 2009 20:01:19 Evan Daniel wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew >> Toseland wrote: >> > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew >> >>

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-30 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Thursday 27 August 2009 20:01:19 Evan Daniel wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: On Wed, Aug 26,

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 27 August 2009 20:01:19 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew > >> Toseland wrote: > >> > On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-29 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 27 August 2009 20:01:19 Evan Daniel wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Monday 27

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > > On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew > >> Toseland wrote: > >> > - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-27 Thread Evan Daniel
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew >> Toseland wrote: >> > On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew >> >> Toseland

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: - RSKs:

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-27 Thread Evan Daniel
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009 19:01:43 Evan Daniel wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: > > - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those distributing executables, need > > a revocation mechanism. This can be emulated with HTML UI elements, but is > > clumsy and problematic

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-26 Thread Evan Daniel
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew >> Toseland wrote: >> > - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those distributing executables, need >> > a revocation mechanism. This can be

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those distributing executables, need a revocation mechanism. This can be emulated with HTML UI elements, but is

Re: [freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-08-26 Thread Evan Daniel
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Monday 27 July 2009 18:26:27 Evan Daniel wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those distributing executables, need

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-07-27 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those distributing executables, need a > revocation mechanism. This can be emulated with HTML UI elements, but is > clumsy and problematic due to the various different error messages. Adding HTML UI

[freenet-dev] RSKs (was Re: NedaNet evaluation of Iran circumvention technologies on Freenet)

2009-07-27 Thread Evan Daniel
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: - RSKs: Important sites, particularly those distributing executables, need a revocation mechanism. This can be emulated with HTML UI elements, but is clumsy and problematic due to the various different error