On Wednesday 17 June 2009 20:43:19 Caco Patane wrote:
> > I think he means that users in "poor" areas usually run pirated versions
> > of XP with the included IE6. Many of these installations won't have a
> > functional Windows Update because of the "Genuine Advantage" stuff
> > Microsoft pushes
Find attached 3 screenshots:
freenet-website-ie6.png - The way I see the site without any change
freenet-website-ie6-pngfix.png - The way I see the site with the PNG fix in IE6
freenet-website-ff-pngfix.png - The way I see the site with the PNG fix in FF
The fix does not work very well for
As I see in the statistics
(http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) IE6 has 14.5%
share and radically decreasing. In my opinion, I think it should be
left dead as it should have been a long time ago. I don't think if
somebody uses that good-for-nothing browser, he will be too
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:26:35 Caco Patane wrote:
>>> Hmmm... do we care? How many people use IE6 at the moment? And what exactly
>>> happens on IE6 with 1-bit-transparent PNGs?
>> At least here (latin america) there are tons of IE6 users: because
>> hardware is
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:26:35 Caco Patane wrote:
> > Hmmm... do we care? How many people use IE6 at the moment? And what exactly
> > happens on IE6 with 1-bit-transparent PNGs?
>
> At least here (latin america) there are tons of IE6 users: because
> hardware is expensive nobody installs
> I think he means that users in "poor" areas usually run pirated versions
> of XP with the included IE6. Many of these installations won't have a
> functional Windows Update because of the "Genuine Advantage" stuff
> Microsoft pushes through it. Wich means that they won't get IE updates
>
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:27:28 Caco Patane wrote:
> > Cool. We could actually do that in CSS, we should probably have hops as a
> > png rather than SVG but that's easy... Would you mind exporting the logo as
> > a transparent PNG of the correct dimensions, for the time being?
>
> Be aware
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:54:21 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:03:38 Cl?ment wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
> > > their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:19:23 Gerard Krol wrote:
> Cl?ment wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
> >> their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
> >> friend
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:03:38 Cl?ment wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
> > their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
> > friend that does?
> >
> > Highest
> Hmmm... do we care? How many people use IE6 at the moment? And what exactly
> happens on IE6 with 1-bit-transparent PNGs?
At least here (latin america) there are tons of IE6 users: because
hardware is expensive nobody installs vista, nobody buys original
windows copies and don't get the
I like it "boxed" (same width in Freenet and The Free Network), find
it attached.
Saludos,
Caco_Patane
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Cl?ment wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:54:21 Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:03:38 Cl?ment wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 17 June
> Cool. We could actually do that in CSS, we should probably have hops as a png
> rather than SVG but that's easy... Would you mind exporting the logo as a
> transparent PNG of the correct dimensions, for the time being?
Be aware of PNG because IE6 does not support well PNG transparency (is
IE6
Cl?ment wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
>
>> Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
>> their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
>> friend that does?
>>
>> Highest priorities:
>>
>> - Fix the logo on the
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
> Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
> their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
> friend that does?
>
> Highest priorities:
>
> - Fix the logo on the website - it should be "Freenet",
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:03:38 Clément wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
friend that does?
Highest priorities:
-
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:19:23 Gerard Krol wrote:
Clément wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
friend that does?
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:54:21 Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:03:38 Clément wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or
Cool. We could actually do that in CSS, we should probably have hops as a png
rather than SVG but that's easy... Would you mind exporting the logo as a
transparent PNG of the correct dimensions, for the time being?
Be aware of PNG because IE6 does not support well PNG transparency (is
IE6
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 14:27:28 Caco Patane wrote:
Cool. We could actually do that in CSS, we should probably have hops as a
png rather than SVG but that's easy... Would you mind exporting the logo as
a transparent PNG of the correct dimensions, for the time being?
Be aware of PNG
Hmmm... do we care? How many people use IE6 at the moment? And what exactly
happens on IE6 with 1-bit-transparent PNGs?
At least here (latin america) there are tons of IE6 users: because
hardware is expensive nobody installs vista, nobody buys original
windows copies and don't get the updates.
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:26:35 Caco Patane wrote:
Hmmm... do we care? How many people use IE6 at the moment? And what exactly
happens on IE6 with 1-bit-transparent PNGs?
At least here (latin america) there are tons of IE6 users: because
hardware is expensive nobody installs vista,
Matthew Toseland skrev:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 16:26:35 Caco Patane wrote:
Hmmm... do we care? How many people use IE6 at the moment? And what exactly
happens on IE6 with 1-bit-transparent PNGs?
At least here (latin america) there are tons of IE6 users: because
hardware is expensive
I think he means that users in poor areas usually run pirated versions
of XP with the included IE6. Many of these installations won't have a
functional Windows Update because of the Genuine Advantage stuff
Microsoft pushes through it. Wich means that they won't get IE updates
automatically,
As I see in the statistics
(http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) IE6 has 14.5%
share and radically decreasing. In my opinion, I think it should be
left dead as it should have been a long time ago. I don't think if
somebody uses that good-for-nothing browser, he will be too
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
friend that does?
Highest priorities:
- Fix the logo on the website - it should be "Freenet", not "FreeNet"
- Create a decent "Get Freenet" button, something
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
friend that does?
Highest priorities:
- Fix the logo on the website - it should be Freenet, not FreeNet
- Create a decent Get Freenet button, something
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
friend that does?
Highest priorities:
- Fix the logo on the website - it should be Freenet, not
Clément wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 01:18:28 Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, we need some help with the website, surely someone out there knows
their way around Gimp, or Adobe Illustrator or something, or has a
friend that does?
Highest priorities:
- Fix the logo on the website - it should be
29 matches
Mail list logo
