Re: [freenet-dev] Maven and JNA

2013-08-03 Thread Thomas Sachau
Matthew Toseland schrieb: We should include JNA so we can use the patch to reduce Freenet's disk I/O priority on Windows. We can include this via auto-update as a separate jar. However, the official jar is apparently built via Maven. We could include the official jar on the theory that while

Re: [freenet-dev] [#ZAK-391-75304]: Re: Maven and JNA

2013-08-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 03 Aug 2013 09:41:02 TeamSpeak Piracy wrote: Discussion of development issues, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of

Re: [freenet-dev] Summary of recent opennet discussions

2013-08-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 02 Aug 2013 19:12:31 Peter Todd wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:36:34PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: Basically the security model is now an attacker has to outspend the defenders in terms of Bitcoins sacrificed. Not perfect, but it may be of value, especially in conjunction

Re: [freenet-dev] Distributed Version Control Update #7: GSoC Midterm Edition

2013-08-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
Thanks for your clear and comprehensive summary! I look forward to trying it one day. With a target repository set, either a default or default-push path, or other Infocalypse configuration, to publish changes: hg fn-push hg push You didn't say how to configure this - this is set up

Re: [freenet-dev] Merging zidel/next into Freemail v0.2 fred-staging/master

2013-08-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 02 Aug 2013 17:49:30 Martin Nyhus wrote: On 08/02/2013 03:47 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thursday 01 Aug 2013 19:35:47 Martin Nyhus wrote: I need to go though this is more detail, but some initial thoughts: Any reason not to forward/CC this to devl? Nope. Your original

Re: [freenet-dev] Distributed Version Control Update #7: GSoC Midterm Edition

2013-08-03 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 08/03/2013 07:29 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: Thanks for your clear and comprehensive summary! I look forward to trying it one day. I'm glad you found it clear! It is also my hope that this project will serve as a basis for other DVCS to add WoT support. With a target repository set, either

[freenet-dev] [#ZAK-391-75304]: Re: Maven and JNA

2013-08-03 Thread TeamSpeak Piracy
Discussion of development issues, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make

[freenet-dev] [#PJO-202-36851]: Re: Distributed Version Control Update #7: GSoC Midterm Edition

2013-08-03 Thread TeamSpeak Piracy
Discussion of development issues, Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make