I note on FMB that people are asking questions about how to sign
messages under SSKs - I have tried to reply but can't due to the RNF
problem we discussed earlier.
The simple answer is that a message posted to an SSK *is* signed,
hence the name Signed Subspace Key. You can be assured that a
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:09:30PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 01:14:58AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
Probabilistic selective caching should simply be based on the number of
steps since the data was found / source was reset. This avoids all this
silly abritrary
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:01:05AM +0100, Christopher William Turner wrote:
I'd like to see all nodes store *everything* *everytime* that they find data
in a new short-term datastore.
That is what the current one does.
The existing datastore can hold long term
specialised information as
Ian Clarke wrote:
To solve FMB's current problem, all you have to do is make FMB flag
messages that are being rebroadcasted, as opposed to those authored
by the owner of the SSK - and preventing a flagged message from
being used to verify the authenticity of an actual message.
This would be
I was under the impression that a goal of freenet was plausable
deniability of the content in your own store. if it stores all
information that comes to your node, couldnt a legal argument be made
against an end user node that the majority of the data in their store is
their because they
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Josh Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was under the impression that a goal of freenet was plausable
deniability of the content in your own store. if it stores all
information that comes to your node, couldnt a legal argument be made
against an end
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:52:20AM -0700, Josh Steiner wrote:
I was under the impression that a goal of freenet was plausable
deniability of the content in your own store. if it stores all
information that comes to your node, couldnt a legal argument be made
against an end user node that
I nuked 3 datastore in the last week because sometime in my tests I run by
mistake two freenet.Node.main processes. I think we need some kind of locking
mechanism to avoid unnecessary store corruptions.
Ciao
--
-
|Marco
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:27:11PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
I did some work on some code which would automatically monitor /. and
mirror the sites linked to by new stories into Freenet.
Duh, obviously I am talking about new Slashdot stories here (Subject:
should have given it away).
Ian.
last week i had this same problem and was told that i should delete my
datastore, which worked. here is that short thread:
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/2002-July/000184.html
twice again, it has corrupted itself since then. here is the order of
events:
last night i had been
[ian@dhcp-63-143 ian]$ fcpput -v 4 mozilla.pdf mozilla.pdf
fcpStartup: begin
1 open sockets
sending fcp id bytes
sending handshake...
fcpStartup: awaiting response
From node: NodeHello
From node: Node=Fred,0.4,1.46,487
From node: Protocol=1.2
From node: EndMessage
fcpStartup: got response
0 open
- Original Message -
From: Josh Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:17 PM
Subject: [freenet-dev] datastore repeatedly corrupting
last week i had this same problem and was told that i should delete my
datastore, which
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 06:30:17PM -0400, SiliconZealot wrote:
You probably hit the Java windows memory ceiling of 81 MB like I did. Then
your Datastore gets corrupted.
I set up a scheduled task to run update snapshot every 4 hours. This
stops the node and starts it again. No problems since
- Original Message -
From: Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] datastore repeatedly corrupting
Why would you want to do this every 4 hours, the snapshot is only
updated daily...?
As an easy way to
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 06:30:17PM -0400, SiliconZealot wrote:
You probably hit the Java windows memory ceiling of 81 MB like I did. Then
your Datastore gets corrupted.
That's interesting, I'll ask Tavin when he is around.
I set up a scheduled task to run update snapshot every 4 hours.
Hmmm, well - the old version of FCPTools at http://freeweb.sf.net/ seems
to work ok, but doesn't support non-DBR inserts.
Does anyone have a working FCPTools which supports non-DBR inserts?
Ian.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 03:20:24PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
[ian@dhcp-63-143 ian]$ fcpput -v 4
I thought we fixed this ages ago? Anyway, freenet.client.cli.Main
doesn't insert the redirect if the file being inserted is already in
Freenet. If anyone feels like fixing this etc etc; I haven't found the
relevant code yet. For the occasional freesites that use this, this
could be used as a DoS
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:21:32AM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
I thought we fixed this ages ago? Anyway, freenet.client.cli.Main
doesn't insert the redirect if the file being inserted is already in
Freenet. If anyone feels like fixing this etc etc; I haven't found the
relevant code yet.
At 02:21 AM 07/25/2002 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
I thought we fixed this ages ago? Anyway, freenet.client.cli.Main
doesn't insert the redirect if the file being inserted is already in
Freenet. If anyone feels like fixing this etc etc; I haven't found the
relevant code yet. For the occasional
At 09:21 PM 07/24/2002 -0500, Ed Onken wrote:
As far as my below fix goes, I don't whether or not we want to fire a
CollisionEvent or not when a CHK has a key collision. I don't know if it
would confuse clients or not to have a insert succeed even when a key
collision occurs.
At 02:21 AM
20 matches
Mail list logo
