Scott G. Miller writes:
I'm not quite sure what you mean by varying keys. The old DS created
a random Rinjndael key which was stored in the index file (this was a
long time ago). Theres no reason it wouldn't still be done this way.
I thought (but could be wrong) that the base key was
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:29:55AM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
Scott G. Miller writes:
I'm not quite sure what you mean by varying keys. The old DS created
a random Rinjndael key which was stored in the index file (this was a
long time ago). Theres no reason it wouldn't still be done
From Peter Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:27:12PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
does linux have equivalent functionality, or was the freenet 3 style
big directory datastore not a problem there anyway?
All the popular linux filesystems do efficient sparse files, IIRC. As
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 06:25:21PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
I volunteer.
Great, I thought I had to do it myself :-)
Hope I can help.
What encapsulates the needs of freenet (APIwise) best? FSDirectory.java?
FS and DS is not as separated as I had hope.
I think there are two approaches
Scott G. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other problem is that the windows filesystem gets somewhat ungainly
slow with large numbers of files in a directory. This should
be solved by having a tree structure. Implementing the DS in the
filesystem again is almost easy, except for the routing table.
Let us not forget all those freeware java relational databases out
there.
They have solved all those locking/indexing/journaling/crash recovery
issues.
Also try a google search for journaling filesystem.
--
Christopher William Turner, http://www.cycom.co.uk/ Java development
since 1996
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 08:44:13 -0400
Benjamin Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott G. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other problem is that the windows filesystem gets somewhat
ungainly slow with large numbers of files in a directory. This
should be solved by having a tree structure.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:27:12PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
does linux have equivalent functionality, or was the freenet 3 style
big directory datastore not a problem there anyway?
All the popular linux filesystems do efficient sparse files, IIRC. As
for java support, no clue. :)
Actually, the original motivating factor behind writing our own
filesystem was that Windows JVMs would never delete files when you told
them to, causing freenet to fill up their drives.
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:47:51PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 06:25:21PM -0400, Dan
My startup time has gone from a minute to around 20-30 minutes now. Same box, same
size DS. I'm looking at what the DS is doing and, well... the phrase Ugh comes to
mind. WHY are we re-inventing a wheel? Especially one that does not (at least to me)
appear to be round?
There's lots of ways
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 06:25:21PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
I volunteer. What encapsulates the needs of freenet (APIwise) best?
FSDirectory.java?
The LRU management? Or is that not-interesting to higher layers except for
diagnostics?
Great. Scott Miller and Tavin Cole are probably good
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:47:51PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 06:25:21PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
I volunteer. What encapsulates the needs of freenet (APIwise) best?
FSDirectory.java?
The LRU management? Or is that not-interesting to higher layers except for
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:47:51PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 06:25:21PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
I volunteer. What encapsulates the needs of freenet (APIwise) best?
FSDirectory.java?
The LRU management? Or is that not-interesting to higher layers except for
13 matches
Mail list logo
