Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:48, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi,
In order to implement SpacePreferencesConfigurationSource I need
access to the current space.
Hence I'm proposing to add String
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:40, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:48, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi,
In order to implement SpacePreferencesConfigurationSource I need
On Jun 28, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:40, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:48, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi,
In order to
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:40, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:48, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:40, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:48, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net
wrote:
Hi,
In order to implement
On Jun 28, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:40, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com
wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27,
Hi all,
I would also like to have a
-moveAttachment() according to
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/DOC/Remote+API+Specification#RemoteAPISpecification-Attachmentsnewinversion2.0which
uses copyAttachment() and removeAttachment() internally.
Other xmlrpc functions, (non-confluence
On Jun 28, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
And the calls to the access bridge are OK, since they are supposed
to be
replaced with calls to the new model once it is in place, so all the
code that needs access to the model *should* use the bridge. Once we
have the new model in
Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
And the calls to the access bridge are OK, since they are supposed
to be
replaced with calls to the new model once it is in place, so all the
code that needs access to the model *should* use the bridge. Once we
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax
gives :
Error number 4001 in 4: Error while parsing velocity page Main.XWikiSyntax
Wrapped Exception: Failed to evaluate content with id XWiki Syntax
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax
...
10 matches
Mail list logo