Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-users] Good News for the XWiki Open Source Project: French State Research funding

2009-09-16 Thread Pascal Voitot
I fully agree with you :) Beyond congratulations, let me tell you that, now, when I say the word XWiki when I propose professional solutions, people don't oppose against it anymore and it even tends to bring some credibility to my propositions... What does it mean? Is it XWiki itself gaining

Re: [xwiki-devs] enterprise pom.xml : hibernate.cfg.xml empty ?

2009-09-16 Thread Hervé Agnoux
Le mardi 15 septembre 2009, Caleb James DeLisle a écrit : Sorry for the late reply, the hsqldb part is commented. This is the way it should be. You have to un-comment it yourself. So, each time I do a clean/install I do an un-comment ?

Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Change the default author of documents created programmatically or provided in XARs

2009-09-16 Thread Jean-Vincent Drean
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean j...@xwiki.com wrote: Hi devs, I'm currently working on documents we create from core/plugins or those we bundle in XARs (xwiki/2.0 conversion, filling title field, etc). I'd like to take advantage of this to discuss about the author we use

Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Change the default author of documents created programmatically or provided in XARs

2009-09-16 Thread Jean-Vincent Drean
Note: after further discussions it appears that setting the author in our XAR is not the solution (it must not be set in exports that aren't backup exports). I'm only going to modify the author that is set when classes are created programmatically. On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Jean-Vincent

Re: [xwiki-devs] enterprise pom.xml : hibernate.cfg.xml empty ?

2009-09-16 Thread Vincent Massol
On Sep 16, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Hervé Agnoux wrote: Le mardi 15 septembre 2009, Caleb James DeLisle a écrit : Sorry for the late reply, the hsqldb part is commented. This is the way it should be. You have to un-comment it yourself. So, each time I do a clean/install I do an un-comment ?

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi, Following our discussion on the new title behavior we need to define the title compat flag value. I'm proposing: #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the compatyiblity mode or not. When the compatibility #-# mode is active, if the document's content first header (level 1

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:38, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: Hi, Following our discussion on the new title behavior we need to define the title compat flag value. I'm proposing: #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the compatyiblity mode or not. When the

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Guillaume Lerouge
+1 for both Beware of the typo: should be using the compatyiblity mode - compatibility not compatyibility Guillaume On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Thomas Mortagne thomas.morta...@xwiki.comwrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:38, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: Hi, Following our

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Vincent Massol wrote: Hi, Following our discussion on the new title behavior we need to define the title compat flag value. I'm proposing: #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the compatyiblity mode or not. When the compatibility #-# mode is active, if the document's

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Vincent Massol
On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: Vincent Massol wrote: Hi, Following our discussion on the new title behavior we need to define the title compat flag value. I'm proposing: #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the compatyiblity mode or not. When

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 15:34, Marius Dumitru Florea mariusdumitru.flo...@xwiki.com wrote: Vincent Massol wrote: Hi, Following our discussion on the new title behavior we need to define the title compat flag value. I'm proposing: #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the

[xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] OfficeImporter API changes for 2.1

2009-09-16 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
Hi Devs, I've been refactoring OfficeImporter code base to make it more modular and maintainable. With these refactorings I believe we can improve the main OfficeImporter API. Currently OfficeImporter component interface exposes following two methods: code void importStream(InputStream

Re: [xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] OfficeImporter API changes for 2.1

2009-09-16 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
Hi, code XHTMLOfficeDocument officeToXHTML(byte[] officeFileData, String referenceDocument, boolean filterStyles) throws OfficeImporterException; XDOMOfficeDocument xhtmlToXDOM(XHTMLOfficeDocument xhtmlOfficeDocument) throws OfficeImporterException; XDOMOfficeDocument officeToXDOM(byte[]

[xwiki-devs] Rendering Groovy Script in Objects

2009-09-16 Thread Andreas Schaefer
I am investigation the possibility to write Panels in Groovy. Unfortunately I am not able to figure out: - if I XWiki would render Groovy script code by itself and if how ? - If not can I render a Groovy script form another Groovy script ? BTW I was stuck for a while when trying to create my

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Title compatibility flag

2009-09-16 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
Hi On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: Hi, Following our discussion on the new title behavior we need to define the title compat flag value. I'm proposing: #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the compatyiblity mode or not. When the

Re: [xwiki-devs] Where to implement Component isolation? (was Re: [Proposal] Component isolation implementations)

2009-09-16 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: We need to decide if we want this only in 2.1M1 or also in 2.0 final or 2.0.x. +1 for 2.0 - Asiri ___ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Wiki macros improvement ideas

2009-09-16 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
HI Ok after a discussion with Thomas we think it's better to do something simple for now: * Modify the wiki macro class to add a Visibility field with 3 values: - Visible to current author. This is to allow to have some macro that only you can see as avail macro while you test it for