Re: [xwiki-devs] Use WYSIWG New Backgournd Color API

2009-10-27 Thread Leon Wang
Hi Marius, I successfully load the tree panel in the WYSIWYG editing model. Thank you so much! :-) I put the compiled xwiki-web-gwt, xwiki-web-wysiwyg and xwiki-webdav 2.02 jar file to the lib folder. After the tree loaded, I found there 2 errors using firebug (thank you for recommendation), one

Re: [xwiki-devs] Use WYSIWG New Backgournd Color API

2009-10-27 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Hi Leon, Leon Wang wrote: Hi Marius, I successfully load the tree panel in the WYSIWYG editing model. Thank you so much! :-) I put the compiled xwiki-web-gwt, xwiki-web-wysiwyg and xwiki-webdav 2.02 jar file to the lib folder. After the tree loaded, I found there 2 errors using firebug

Re: [xwiki-devs] Use WYSIWG New Backgournd Color API

2009-10-27 Thread Leon Wang
Hi Marius, I have change it to $wnd[wysiwyg_editor], so now it looks like: native void setBackgroudColor(String color) /*-{ $wnd[wysiwyg_editor].getCommandManager().execute('backcolor', color); alert($wnd[wysiwyg_editor].getCommandManager().getValue('backcolor')); }-*/; And this time the

Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r24726 - platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/watchlist/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/plugin/watchlist

2009-10-27 Thread Vincent Massol
On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:31 PM, jvdrean (SVN) wrote: Author: jvdrean Date: 2009-10-27 12:31:28 +0100 (Tue, 27 Oct 2009) New Revision: 24726 Modified: platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/watchlist/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/ plugin/watchlist/WatchListEvent.java Log: XPWATCHLIST-91 : Hide

Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki 2.0 Syntax

2009-10-27 Thread Mikhail Kotelnikov
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote: Vincent Massol wrote: Hi, Since I'm rewriting the new Rendering component (see http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewRenderingArchitecture ) , we need to finalize the new syntax we want to have. Right

[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Don't release 2.1M1 and instead replace 2.1M2 with 2.1M1

2009-10-27 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi, We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases. Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important (see

Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Don't release 2.1M1 and instead replace 2.1M2 with 2.1M1

2009-10-27 Thread Thomas Mortagne
+1 On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 18:22, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: Hi, We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases. Namely

Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Don't release 2.1M1 and instead replace 2.1M2 with 2.1M1

2009-10-27 Thread Jean-Vincent Drean
+1, JV. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: Hi, We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.

Re: [xwiki-devs] Lucene search as default search?

2009-10-27 Thread Denis Gervalle
Hi Vincent, 22 opens issues on the lucene plugins seems to me a lot to put it as a default. Of course, I'd really like to see most of them solved, but some seems to me blocker issue to put the lucene plugins as the default: XPLUCENE-5 XPLUCENE-8 XPLUCENE-13 XPLUCENE-30 XPLUCENE-33 XPLUCENE-34

Re: [xwiki-devs] Lucene search as default search?

2009-10-27 Thread Pascal Voitot
Hello, I already use it as default (since 1.9.x) as I have a solution with too many data (mainly attached documents) to index and needed a more powerful indexation engine. Lucene works quite good for me but you are right, those open issues might be ennoying... I'm not expert enough to choose...

Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Don't release 2.1M1 and instead replace 2.1M2 with 2.1M1

2009-10-27 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
+1 Thanks, Marius Vincent Massol wrote: Hi, We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases. Namely there are 11 issues and most

[xwiki-devs] Question on Object rights

2009-10-27 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi, I've just noticed on trunk that now non admin users can only see a few classes in the object editor: some Blog classes and the Panel Class. Is that normal? I don't remember when we decided this. Thanks -Vincent ___ devs mailing list

[xwiki-devs] Initialize XWikiContext in a servlet filter

2009-10-27 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Hi devs, I recently wrote a small servlet that receives GWT requests, calls the component that matches the request and sends back the result. It works fine with components that don't use the XWikiContext. For those components that use it, like DocumentAccessBridge, I need to initialize the

Re: [xwiki-devs] Question on Object rights

2009-10-27 Thread Guillaume Lerouge
Hi, On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote: Hi, I've just noticed on trunk that now non admin users can only see a few classes in the object editor: some Blog classes and the Panel Class. Is that normal? I don't remember when we decided this. That sounds