Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 18:10, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi Denis,
On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
Hi Vincent,
We had already talk in the past about that matters. Globally, what you
proposed seems good and really honest.
But until we
On 03/17/2010 11:16 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 18:10, Vincent Massolvinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi Denis,
On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
Hi Vincent,
We had already talk in the past about that matters. Globally, what you
proposed
On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if pascal is me or someone else but I'm also one Pascal so I
answer ;)
Sorry for the long mail...
I agree with this kind of governance as long as XWiki.org keeps fully free
and brings the best and latest code with
Hi Vincent,
We had already talk in the past about that matters. Globally, what you
proposed seems good and really honest.
But until we see a real implementation, it is difficult to know if it could
have or not a negative effect on the way the product is seen by open-source
adepts.
I completely
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 15:44, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the following 2
Hello,
I don't know if pascal is me or someone else but I'm also one Pascal so I
answer ;)
Sorry for the long mail...
I agree with this kind of governance as long as XWiki.org keeps fully free
and brings the best and latest code with LGPL license. I agree that
companies contributing to XWiki
Hi,
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the following 2 questions:
1) who owns it and thus
Hi Pascal,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Pascal Voitot
pascal.voitot@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I don't know if pascal is me or someone else but I'm also one Pascal so I
answer ;)
Yes, I meant you :-)
Sorry for the long mail...
Thanks for the detailed feedback!
I agree with this
As I have been looking for a job, I feel that I am biased toward XWikiSAS.
Trying to be as independent as possible, I am in favor of advertising on
xwiki.org as long as:
1. There is a detailed open standard which any company can try to meet.
2. That standard is published on xwiki.org and linked
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the following 2 questions:
1) who owns it and thus controls (or rather provides
11 matches
Mail list logo
