Note that I don't actually use bash completions (nor bash) so I don't
have much investment in this one way or another.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:20:21PM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> I have had a look through the man pages of these scripts and I would
> classify them as follows:
>
I have here a list of scripts in devscripts that do not have bash
completions.
add-patch
annotate-output
archpath
cowpoke
cvs-debc
cvs-debi
cvs-debrelease
cvs-debuild
dcmd
debcheckout
debclean
debcommit
debdiff
debpkg
debrelease
deb-reversion
debrsign
dep3changelog
desktop2menu
diff2patches
ses for git, cvs etc.
A third approach is to say that's all very nice, but I don't feel like
contributing to that. I kind of like the third approach.
On 01/12/15 22:18, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have here a list of scripts in devscripts that do not have bash
completions.
add-patch
annotate-outpu
using debian/links for symlinking bash completions
---
debian/links | 20
scripts/Makefile | 6 ++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/links b/debian/links
index 44d8bfa..c75ebf9 100644
--- a/debian/links
+++ b/debian/links
@@ -11,23
