Hi again,
First of all, thanks for your replies!
We have concluded that Dia is not the way to go for us. The main reasons for
this are:
- Dia is not very extensible. For example, adding extra attributes to shapes
to put extra meta data in is not possible within XML boundaries.
- Validation of
We have concluded that Dia is not the way to go for us. The main
reasons for
this are:
- Dia is not very extensible. For example, adding extra attributes to
shapes
to put extra meta data in is not possible within XML boundaries.
In my opinon as well, we need to completly change the xml
On 2002.11.06 22:40 James K. Lowden wrote:
On 06 Nov 2002 12:26:43 -0600, Lars Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Durk Strooisma wrote:
We noticed that Dia doens't make use of DTDs or XML Schemas (for
example to validate Dia XML documents). Even correct DTDs or XML
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Durk Strooisma wrote:
Hi,
We noticed that Dia doens't make use of DTDs or XML Schemas (for example
to validate Dia XML documents). Even correct DTDs or XML Schemas aren't
provided, which would be handy to validate Dia XML documents within XML
authoring tools.
Probably
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Durk Strooisma wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 19:19:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Durk Strooisma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dia Schemas/DTDs
Hi,
We noticed that Dia doens't make use of DTDs or XML Schemas (for example to
On 06 Nov 2002 12:26:43 -0600, Lars Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Durk Strooisma wrote:
We noticed that Dia doens't make use of DTDs or XML Schemas (for
example to validate Dia XML documents). Even correct DTDs or XML
Schemas aren't provided, which would be handy
