Walter Bright Wrote:
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
see my comments there for more details.
I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you
Walter Bright, el 14 de octubre a las 20:46 me escribiste:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that
were blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Sweet, JSON output, looks like it wasn't very hard to write :)
It was rather trivial. But it's a bit primitive right now. The problem
is I'm not writing a consumer of this data, so I'm not sure what it
should contain. Consider it as a trial balloon.
I'm interested
Walter Bright:
Using DMD 2.035 I have tried to compile:
void main() {}
Using:
dmd -X temp.d
And the compiler crashes.
Regarding the -X name, isn't something like -json better? Or better to
unify the switch for json output and normal ddoc output in some way.
Even better, DMD2 compilation
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
foo((1,2)); // um, what?
You see that kind of thing in Python all the time, with NumPy at
least. Array dimensions for example are set with a tuple. So
x = array((1,2), dtype=int)
And very common to see things like numpy.zeros((10,20)).
This is
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
downs wrote:
Here is a funny consequence of this amusing fact:
if you overload opAssign in a struct with lazy T[] dgs..., you can
achieve the following syntax
WithFlag(GL_BLEND, true) =
On 10/14/09 06:36, dsimcha wrote:
Is there a way to get the name of an alias parameter at compile time? For
example:
void doStuff() {
// Do stuff.
}
void templ(alias fun)() {
writeln(fun.stringof); // Prints doStuff.
}
Do you want that to print fun instead of doStuff?
Bartosz Milewski:
It's good to know that my ideas are still circulating in the D community.
Thanks, guys!
They will keep circulating! And there's not just D in computer science, future
computer languages may use your ideas. Someday I'll design my own C-like
language, simpler (and more limited
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
with reasonable expressiveness and efficiency.
Last night this idea occurred to me: we could simply use
Don:
BTW we need to deal with slices as well as indexes. I think the way to
do this is to make a slice into a type of index.
Such slice also needs a way to specify the end of the enclosing interval, the $
syntax.
Slice may enjoy a lot a third optional argument (default = 1), that represents
Should I bear this??
module teststructarray;
import std.stdio;
import core.stdc.stdlib:system;
struct Point
{
int x;
int y;
}
static Point[2] pArray1=
[
{0,0},{0,1},//watch here!
];
static Point pArray2[2][3]=
[
[{0,0},{0,1},{0,2}],
[{1,0},{1,1},{1,2}],//watch here,without the last
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
with reasonable expressiveness and efficiency.
Last night this idea
Iamgottingcrazy:
Should I bear this??
With D1 it seems to work:
http://codepad.org/hpslrHHs
Bye,
bearophile
Bartosz Milewski wrote:
Nick B Wrote:
Nick B wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Unfortunately, Bartosz has declined to contribute.
I have read a good amount of his interesting blog posts, he has shown
me many things I didn't know about. And he was
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
with reasonable expressiveness and efficiency.
Last night this
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Java's syntax has the advantage of having to type less when the annotation has
no arguments: @annotation vs. [annotation].
In both cases you have a two-keys overhead.
Robert Jacques Wrote:
Also needed is an extension of the opDollar to return different values
based on the index:
opDollar(size_t index);
Dollar is just a synonym for length, isn't it?
Kagamin wrote:
Robert Jacques Wrote:
Also needed is an extension of the opDollar to return different values
based on the index:
opDollar(size_t index);
Dollar is just a synonym for length, isn't it?
Yes, but if opIndex and opSlice take multiple indices (like in a matrix)
opDollar needs
I made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in D.
It can read and parse files and external dtds and entities with
differrent BOM and encodings.
This xmlp (XmlPieceParser class) passes 100% on both validating and
non-validating modes for the following test sets:- oasis, sun,
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
It can read and parse files and external dtds and entities with
differrent BOM and encodings.
This xmlp (XmlPieceParser class) passes 100% on both validating and
non-validating modes for the following test sets:- oasis,
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
Yes, but if opIndex and opSlice take multiple indices (like in a matrix)
opDollar needs a way to distinguish between the different dimensions.
size_t length(size_t idx);
On 2009-10-14 10:48:10 +0200, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com said:
Iamgottingcrazy:
Should I bear this??
With D1 it seems to work:
http://codepad.org/hpslrHHs
Bye,
bearophile
maybe because you actually used the correct sequence of dimensions...
int[2][3] x;
x.length is 3, this is a
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:26:38 -0400, Iamgottingcrazy
shouldilearnt...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Should I bear this??
module teststructarray;
import std.stdio;
import core.stdc.stdlib:system;
struct Point
{
int x;
int y;
}
static Point[2] pArray1=
[
{0,0},{0,1},//watch here!
];
static Point
Kagamin wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Java's syntax has the advantage of having to type less when the annotation has
no arguments: @annotation vs. [annotation].
In both cases you have a two-keys overhead.
No, why?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
with
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Java's syntax has the advantage of having to type less when the
annotation has no arguments: @annotation vs. [annotation].
In both
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
Robert Jacques Wrote:
Also needed is an extension of the opDollar to return different
values based on the index:
opDollar(size_t index);
Dollar is just a synonym for length, isn't it?
Yes, but if opIndex and opSlice take multiple indices (like
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Java's syntax has the advantage of having to type less when the
annotation has no arguments: @annotation vs.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:11:22 -0400, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
Robert Jacques Wrote:
Also needed is an extension of the opDollar to return different values
based on the index:
opDollar(size_t index);
Dollar is just a synonym for length, isn't it?
User types can also override Dollar,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:31:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Don wrote:
Well timed. I just wrote this operator overloading proposal, part 1.
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP7
I concentrated on getting the use cases established.
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
with reasonable expressiveness and efficiency.
I would hope that *= += /= and friends could all be handled
Jeremie Pelletier schrieb:
Back when I started programming on a french canadian layout, most of
these symbols were located at crazy places, like ? is shift-6, [], {},
are all found using right-alt + one of the many keys close to enter,
which are used for accents, really annoying. Even the
bearophile wrote:
Bartosz Milewski:
It's good to know that my ideas are still circulating in the D community. Thanks,
guys!
They will keep circulating! And there's not just D in computer science, future
computer languages may use your ideas. Someday I'll design my own C-like
language,
Frank Benoit Wrote:
And people here wonder why I custom order my laptops and keyboards to
get native US layouts..
Jeremie
Hehe, same here in Germany
In non-latin keyboard layouts there's no latin symbols at all. Feel the
difference.
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
I agree here, while I think Andrei's book is a must for the community
to grow, it should rush the compiler. I strongly believe D2 needs
proper shared and lent semantics, or else we're just creating a
stepping stone for D3, leaving D2 in a
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Java's syntax has the advantage of having to type less when the
annotation has no arguments: @annotation vs.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
with reasonable expressiveness
Walter Bright Wrote:
I'm considering setting up another D newsgroup called D.marketplace. In
it, you can essentially post advertisements for your D products, hang
out a shingle offering your D consulting services, post want ads for D
programmers, anything business oriented that's related
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For the record, I delayed signing for the book for quite a few months.
Before I did sign, there was solemn agreement in the D team that we can
commit. [snip]
Commit to what, exactly ?
Nick B
Nick B wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For the record, I delayed signing for the book for quite a few months.
Before I did sign, there was solemn agreement in the D team that we
can commit. [snip]
Commit to what, exactly ?
Nick B
Commit to delivering the book and the language
Consider a Stack interface:
interface Stack(T) {
bool empty();
ref T top();
void push(T value);
void pop();
size_t length();
}
Let's attach contracts to the interface:
interface Stack(T) {
bool empty();
ref T top()
in {
assert(!empty());
}
void push(T
Between sharing the whole object and sharing scope lies specifying exactly
what to share, I'd think.
Here is one possible syntax, like regular function calls. Parameter types
can possibly be inferred and omitted:
void push(T value);
in {
out(length());
}
out(size_t oldLength) {
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they
Michael Rynn wrote:
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
It can read and parse files and external dtds and entities with
differrent BOM and encodings.
[snip]
Very possibly there is a non-validating parser inside that is a fair
bit smaller that this, that
Saaa wrote:
Yigal Chripun yigal...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hb2u2n$2if...@digitalmars.com...
On 13/10/2009 20:24, Saaa wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote
ego has nothing to do with being smart.
you can be extremely smart without getting on people's nerves all the
time.
A smart person can
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Commit to what, exactly ?
Nick B
Commit to delivering the book and the language matching it.
Andrei
To meet a final release of D 2.0 ?
Nick B
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Ary Borenszweig
a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Java's syntax has the advantage of having to type less when the
annotation has no arguments:
Nick B wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Commit to what, exactly ?
Nick B
Commit to delivering the book and the language matching it.
Andrei
To meet a final release of D 2.0 ?
Nick B
Yes, that's the plan. D2 final release begets TDPL, and TDPL describes
the final release of D2.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Consider a Stack interface:
interface Stack(T) {
bool empty();
ref T top();
void push(T value);
void pop();
size_t length();
}
Let's attach contracts to the interface:
interface Stack(T) {
bool empty();
ref T top()
in {
Jason House wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b]
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators: opIndex and opIndexAssign
don't seem to be up to snuff because they don't catch operations like
a[b] += c;
Lutger wrote:
Between sharing the whole object and sharing scope lies specifying exactly
what to share, I'd think.
Here is one possible syntax, like regular function calls. Parameter types
can possibly be inferred and omitted:
void push(T value);
in {
out(length());
}
out(size_t
Lutger wrote:
Between sharing the whole object and sharing scope lies specifying exactly
what to share, I'd think.
Here is one possible syntax, like regular function calls. Parameter types
can possibly be inferred and omitted:
void push(T value);
in {
out(length());
}
out(size_t
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote
The most important thing is remembering that black text on a white screen
carries absolutely no emotional information whatsoever, in either
direction, in any case. The exception that proves the rule, of course, is
ZOMG NERD RAGE ALLCAPS. Otherwise, there's
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:49:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Right now we're in trouble with operators:
bearophile Wrote:
it's hard for me to subscribe to the good enough philosophy (as long as
it's better that C++, it's fine for D).
D language is largely grown, and not designed. D is not Scala or Haskell.
...
So I think some of the design mistakes of D2 will be fixed in D3 :-)
With
Michael Rynn wrote
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
nice
But I would like to have it made available so others can test.
Maybe add it as an enhancement in bugzilla
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
NG attachement? Or is that
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Lutger wrote:
Between sharing the whole object and sharing scope lies specifying
exactly what to share, I'd think.
Here is one possible syntax, like regular function calls. Parameter types
can possibly be inferred and omitted:
void push(T value);
in {
Don wrote:
Bartosz Milewski wrote:
[snip]
Please stay in touch, we will try to win you back...
Of the issues you mention, this one seems the easiest to address:
As far as my thread work went, I had an almost working implementation
of spawn, except for a nasty compiler bug which resisted
I'm working on some mathy modules that I'd like to eventually contribute to
Phobos, or, if they're too niche, to a standalone lib. One that I've alluded
to here in the past few days is MathExp. Basically what it does is
parse/interpret/evaluate/manipulate mathematical expressions at runtime.
Nick B Wrote:
Could you give us _any_ kind of test case (even if it's enormous)?
Bartosz - are you able to provide a test case as requested by Don ?
Then it might be possible, to get this bug fixed.
Nick B.
I can send you the files I have checked out.
The problem was in core.thread.
Saaa Wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
nice
But I would like to have it made available so others can test.
Maybe add it as an enhancement in bugzilla
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
NG
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:56:10PM -0400, Bartosz Milewski wrote:
The problem was in core.thread. I tried to implement a struct Tid (thread ID)
with reference-counting semantics and deterministic destruction. It passed
all the tests, but when it was used in one particular place in druntime it
Justin Johansson wrote
Saaa Wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
nice
But I would like to have it made available so others can test.
Maybe add it as an enhancement in bugzilla
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB
Michael Rynn wrote
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
Attaching it to an enhancement in bugzilla would be best, I think.
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Saaa wrote:
Justin Johansson wrote
Saaa Wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
nice
But I would like to have it made available so others can test.
Maybe add it as an enhancement in bugzilla
Saaa wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
Attaching it to an enhancement in bugzilla would be best, I think.
Yes please. Making the code work with ranges as input would be great.
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Eiffel offers the old keyword that refers to the old object in a
postcondition. But it seems quite wasteful to clone the object just to
have a contract look at a little portion of the old object.
You don't need to clone the whole object. You just need to cache the
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
Attaching it to an enhancement in bugzilla would be best, I think.
Yes please. Making the code work with ranges as input would be great.
Andrei
Hi Andrei,
Still being
Justin Johansson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
Attaching it to an enhancement in bugzilla would be best, I think.
Yes please. Making the code work with ranges as input would be great.
Andrei
Hi
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
He meant range structs as found in std.range and their array wrappers in
std.array.
Oh, okay. Just groked src and looks like it is a D2 only thing. Do you happen
to know
what the derivation of the word range with respect to streams is? I haven't
come
across it
Saaa wrote:
Michael Rynn wrote
I have made a validating or optionally none validating XML parser in
D.
nice
But I would like to have it made available so others can test.
Maybe add it as an enhancement in bugzilla
Where and to whom can I post the 56 KB source code zip?
NG attachement? Or
Justin Johansson Wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
He meant range structs as found in std.range and their array wrappers in
std.array.
Oh, okay. Just groked src and looks like it is a D2 only thing. Do you
happen to know
what the derivation of the word range with respect to streams
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
Justin Johansson wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
He meant range structs as found in std.range and their array wrappers in
std.array.
Oh, okay. Just groked src and looks like it is a D2 only thing. Do you
happen to know
what the derivation of the
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hb5bnq$1k4...@digitalmars.com...
The most important thing is remembering that black text on a white screen
carries absolutely no emotional information whatsoever, in either
direction, in any case.
Thank goodness I use white
On 12/10/2009 10:47, Don wrote:
Ah, OK. My cursory glance at Nemerle just screamed hack. But first
impressions can be misleading.
No doubt as a C-family language, they have some useful ideas.
But if Christopher's analysis is correct, the macro bit is different
to the plugin bit. I think
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 12/10/2009 10:47, Don wrote:
Ah, OK. My cursory glance at Nemerle just screamed hack. But first
impressions can be misleading.
No doubt as a C-family language, they have some useful ideas.
But if Christopher's analysis is correct, the macro bit is different
to the
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
#ponce Wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
There is a typo in the title. Should I compare pointers with is oR == ?
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0400, #ponce wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
There is no difference because you can't overload the == operator etc.
for pointers.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0400, #ponce alil...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
Like Moritz said, there is no semantic difference with pointers, but you
may consider comparing with is if you are looking for equivalence.
Thanks for the answers.
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0400, #ponce alil...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
Like Moritz said, there is no semantic difference with pointers, but you
may consider comparing with is if you
Manfred_Nowak wrote:
For C# in
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/42929/Csharp-4-0-Exposer-an-evil-
DynamicObject.aspx
describes code to disable all restrictions of visibility.
Is such possible in D too?
-manfred
I don't think so, its really not a good thing to do anyways.
Hello #ponce,
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
Because it's always safe, I tend to use 'is' in any cases where one side
could be null.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:20:24 -0400, Justin Johansson n...@spam.com
wrote:
#ponce Wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
Thanks for asking this question ponce; I've been getting into the habit of
using 'is' for both pointers
and classes, so
Max Samukha Wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:20:24 -0400, Justin Johansson n...@spam.com
wrote:
#ponce Wrote:
It's a bit unclear to me.
I know I must compare references with is but pointers ?
Thanks for asking this question ponce; I've been getting into the habit of
using 'is'
I got motivated by Walter putting out latest cuts of D1 and D2 (a D2 update in
less than
a week recently!), so ...
Rather than having a single global install of DMD for linux, I'd like to have
both D1 and D2
installed (i.e. distros unzipped into)
/opt/dmd1 and /opt/dmd2 respectively
and then
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2158
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2983
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=730
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2009-10-14
01:31:43 PDT ---
This also has to do with type safety.
---
a[]=b[];
---
This expression is ambiguous. What was meant? Copy items from b[] slice to a[]
slice or assign
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #3 from Fawzi Mohamed fa...@gmx.ch 2009-10-14 01:49:24 PDT ---
thanks!
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2815
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3396
Summary: Call of abstract method not detected by semantic check
Product: D
Version: 2.031
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3397
Summary: Unintended function call to static opCall
Product: D
Version: 1.048
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2983
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-14
07:01:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is failing because 'a' isn't available while in the constraint.
Exactly. The idea is that making the parameter names
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3398
Summary: Version block inside a union screws data alignment
Product: D
Version: 2.031
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
