dsimcha wrote:
Is there currently a way in D2 to get the parameters of all instantiations of
a template in a given scope?
Templates are instantiated lazily, meaning it doesn't make much sense to
figure this out at compile time.
On 25/10/2009 01:22, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-10-24 18:45:10 -0400, Justin Johansson n...@spam.com said:
Let me try again. You have a set of N things which are represented by
an enum definition. There is some subset of this set containing M
things (so M N) which represents the things
On 25/10/2009 06:26, Jason House wrote:
My web search and some PDF's didn't turn up a handy example. You can
do things in scala like define your own foreach loop. If foreach had
the form form foreach(x){y} then x would be one set of arguments and
y would be another set. It makes for pretty use
www.erdani.com
Time to go to sleep. Another milestone in store for tomorrow - getting
beyond page 300.
Andrei
dsimcha wrote:
Other than possible lack of manpower, I don't see why the LDC people don't
just
use setjmp/longjmp exception handling in the interim. It seems like a
good better than nothing solution until LLVM gets fixed properly.
The reason *is* lack of manpower. No one has volunteered to
This post is born from a bug I've just removed.
In the past I have read more than one C coding standard (or better, lists of
coding tips) that warn against bugs caused by ++ and --. They suggest to not
use them compound in expressions. They allow to use them when alone on an
instruction.
bearophile Wrote:
This post is born from a bug I've just removed.
In the past I have read more than one C coding standard (or better, lists of
coding tips) that warn against bugs caused by ++ and --. They suggest to not
use them compound in expressions. They allow to use them when alone on
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:33:13 +0200, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
- Make them return void, so they can't be used as expressions like this:
y = x++;
foo(x--);
You have to use them as:
x++; y = x;
x--; foo(x);
(So ++ and -- become similar to the Inc() and Dec() functions of
Right now, you can catch every exception with try { something; } catch
{ somethingelse; }.
Can we get rid of this abomination before D2 is finalized? I claim that
it's completely useless, and even more so, every single use of this is a
bug.
If you really want to catch everything, you might
d-noob:
That would break C compatibility and sounds ridiculous.
It breaks C compatibility, but it doesn't assign a new meaning to a C syntax,
it just disallows a syntax used in C, and this is allowed by D philosophy.
Many of the things I say sound ridiculous :-)
You may say it's not a handy
d-noob wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
This post is born from a bug I've just removed.
In the past I have read more than one C coding standard (or better, lists of
coding tips) that warn against bugs caused by ++ and --. They suggest to not
use them compound in expressions. They allow to use them
Tiago Carvalho wrote:
I don't know about the D support, but codeblocks is not really outdated.
If you get the nightly builds the last version is from October 10
2009. They are usually very stable (full with bug fixes and new
features), by now I would say even more than the version in the main
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in
news:hc19h9$ih...@digitalmars.com:
Removing those operators from D, as Python, may look excessive. So a
possible compromise can be: - Deprecate the pre versions: --x and
++x - Make them return void, so they can't be used as expressions like
bearophile Wrote:
d-noob:
That would break C compatibility and sounds ridiculous.
It breaks C compatibility, but it doesn't assign a new meaning to a C syntax,
it just disallows a syntax used in C, and this is allowed by D philosophy.
Many of the things I say sound ridiculous :-)
You
bearophile Wrote:
This post is born from a bug I've just removed.
In the past I have read more than one C coding standard (or better, lists of
coding tips) that warn against bugs caused by ++ and --. They suggest to not
use them compound in expressions. They allow to use them when alone on
bearophile wrote:
This post is born from a bug I've just removed.
In the past I have read more than one C coding standard (or better, lists
of coding tips) that warn against bugs caused by ++ and --. They suggest
to not use them compound in expressions. They allow to use them when alone
on
grauzone, el 25 de octubre a las 12:09 me escribiste:
Right now, you can catch every exception with try { something; }
catch { somethingelse; }.
Can we get rid of this abomination before D2 is finalized? I claim
that it's completely useless, and even more so, every single use of
this is a
http://langref.org/
Need some D versions!
bearophile wrote:
Removing those operators from D, as Python, may look excessive. So a
possible compromise can be: - Deprecate the pre versions: --x and
++x
There is nothing wrong with the prefix versions. '--x' is the
equivalent of 'x -= 1', but with less excessive typing. Any confusing
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
d-noob:
That would break C compatibility and sounds ridiculous.
It breaks C compatibility, but it doesn't assign a new meaning to a C syntax,
it
just disallows a syntax used in C, and this is allowed by D philosophy.
Many of the
I've been wondering which is more commonly used, tango 0.99.8 or trunk, so I
set up a little poll:
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/704493-211964
I couldn't find any poll generators that didn't use JS :( (I'll have to
make one...)
Also, that last answer is just there to try to attract
Walter Bright wrote:
http://langref.org/
Need some D versions!
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:D is much more complete.
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
www.erdani.com
Time to go to sleep. Another milestone in store for tomorrow - getting
beyond page 300.
Andrei
Grats!
--
Simen
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:23:48 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
www.erdani.com
Time to go to sleep. Another milestone in store for tomorrow - getting
beyond page 300.
Andrei
It's page 300 and still no excerpt? :)
grauzone wrote:
Right now, you can catch every exception with try { something; } catch
{ somethingelse; }.
Can we get rid of this abomination before D2 is finalized? I claim that
it's completely useless, and even more so, every single use of this is a
bug.
If you really want to catch
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:23:48 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
www.erdani.com
Time to go to sleep. Another milestone in store for tomorrow - getting
beyond page 300.
Andrei
It's page 300 and still no excerpt? :)
Need my editor's
303 pages and counting!
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
303 pages and counting!
Come and get them!
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:53:23 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:23:48 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
www.erdani.com
Time to go to sleep. Another milestone in store for tomorrow -
Lionello Lunesu l...@lunesu.remove.com wrote in message
news:hbulk2$1jt...@digitalmars.com...
On 22-10-2009 8:01, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
the only valid IMO use case for header files is for linking libs - the
compiler can handle just find binary formats for that.
I was
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:20091024182205.ga28...@llucax.com.ar...
AJ, el 24 de octubre a las 01:44 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:20091023125658.ga23...@llucax.com.ar...
AJ, el 22 de octubre a las 22:08 me escribiste:
Walter alluded to these a while back in one of his Dr Dobbs articles
(nested functions, part 2), and this evening I've been playing with them
a little.
It doesn't look like they be mentioned anywhere in the spec.
How do they work? It looks kinda like you would just replace any
nonlocal symbol
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3123
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsim...@yahoo.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3440
Summary: invalid -X JSON output, a comma is missing
Product: D
Version: 2.035
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3123
--- Comment #2 from Kyle Foley k-fo...@onu.edu 2009-10-25 21:08:42 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=481)
Zip fixes
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3123
--- Comment #3 from Kyle Foley k-fo...@onu.edu 2009-10-25 21:10:50 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The problem looks to be a question of whether range.front is an lvalue or
not.
When range.front is an lvalue, DMD interprets range.front as
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3123
--- Comment #4 from Kyle Foley k-fo...@onu.edu 2009-10-25 21:13:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created an attachment (id=481) [details]
Zip fixes
I changed Proxy to store by reference for ranges supporting reference return
types and by
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3441
Summary: Snow Leopard: Static constructors do not work
Product: D
Version: 1.050
Platform: All
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
38 matches
Mail list logo
