Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
===
Such uninitialized
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about
void assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
Saaa wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask, I
made this change
This is an important topic for anyone who is building software systems
that, if they fail, can cause injury or large property damage.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9z811/safe_systems_from_unreliable_parts/
dsimcha wrote:
2. I'm thinking about how to write the bitmask templates. In the next
release of DMD, when static arrays are value types and returnable from
functions, will they be returnable from functions in CTFE?
Yes.
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 23/10/2009 13:02, bearophile wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls:
I prefer this (Scala):
list = list ++ (0 to 10)
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I have *ever* even used wchar/wstring.
Char/string gosh yes;
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 29 de octubre a las 16:06 me escribiste:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
What I cannot for the life of me understand is WHY the double
underscores? What's wrong with just traits?
Because D needed the feature, and it wasn't clear what a good syntax
for it
Michael Mittner wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
It could be that the C library routine strtold(), which the lexer relies
on, changed. That has nothing to do with linking.
Hmm. This is where dmd struggles:
641:[0x1.a5f1c2eb3fe4efp+73, 0x1.A5F1C2EB3FE4EFp-1, 74],// normal
I have no
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcaaro$15e...@digitalmars.com...
I think foreach should be consistent with opIn, that is,
if (foo in aa) { //it is in the aa.
foreach (f; aa) { // loop over each item in the aa
//I expect foo to show up in
Phil Deets wrote:
mixin(qENUM
enum Tag
{
A, B,
ENUM~(Version!(symbol)?qENUM
C, D,
ENUM:)~qENUM
E,
}
ENUM);
That's not pretty, but it's good enough for me; so I'll probably not do
any compiler hacking.
Not pretty is putting it very lightly.
What's happening in the D
Don wrote:
That's odd. Please try adding an 'L' to end of each of each constant.
[0x1.a5f1c2eb3fe4efp+73L, 0x1.A5F1C2EB3FE4EFp-1L, 74],
Oh, I'm really sorry, I copied the wrong line (this was 640). Here's the
guilty line (641, this time for real):
[0x1.fa01712e8f0471ap-1064,
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
Rainer Deyke Wrote:
- However, the language has other features that can be abused to
provide the functionality in a syntactically ugly way.
- D programmers use these language features to write powerful but ugly
code.
There was a word that macros are not needed because string mixins are
Don:
traits.compiles(XXX)
traits.typeid(TTT)
traits.stringof(T)
traits.allMembers(T)
traits.error(message);
Cute.
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
Or, more uniformly (all D
Op Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:44:08 +0100 schreef bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
Not nice. Bad.
Walter Bright wrote:
This is an important topic for anyone who is building software systems
that, if they fail, can cause injury or large property damage.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9z811/safe_systems_from_unreliable_parts/
Clicking on the link linked by your link, I get:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
If you use (or admin a project that requires) Tango trunk instead of
0.99.8: Why? (Select all that apply)
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/704493-212991
The new stack tracing feature is essential. Normally you'd use a
debugger, but we're talking about D here.
On 30.10.2009 12:16, grauzone wrote:
The new stack tracing feature is essential. Normally you'd use a
debugger, but we're talking about D here.
Same goes for me. I use the oldest revision where the stack tracing
works, which is 4498. Plus a patch to make it work on Vista.
On 30.10.2009 12:16, grauzone wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
This is an important topic for anyone who is building software systems
that, if they fail, can cause injury or large property damage.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9z811/safe_systems_from_unreliable_parts/
Clicking
grauzone wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
This is an important topic for anyone who is building software systems
that, if they fail, can cause injury or large property damage.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9z811/safe_systems_from_unreliable_parts/
Clicking on the link linked by
On 10/30/09 06:08, dsimcha wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it, but it
at least basically works. I also still need to write the templates to
generate bit masks at compile time,
bearophile wrote:
Don:
traits.compiles(XXX)
traits.typeid(TTT)
traits.stringof(T)
traits.allMembers(T)
traits.error(message);
Cute.
Simpler alternative, the dot isn't necessary:
traits_compiles(XXX)
traits_typeid(TTT)
traits_stringof(T)
traits_allmembers(T)
traits_error(message);
That is
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Don wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad
pub...@kyllingen.nospamnet wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full
Walter Bright Wrote:
This is an important topic for anyone who is building software systems
that, if they fail, can cause injury or large property damage.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9z811/safe_systems_from_unreliable_parts/
Downvoted for poor links :(
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is expressions
Jason House Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
This is an important topic for anyone who is building software systems
that, if they fail, can cause injury or large property damage.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9z811/safe_systems_from_unreliable_parts/
Downvoted for poor
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
p18. What is unsafe about implicit conversion of static to dynamic array?
Meaning getting a dynamic array pointing to a stack allocated
array.
Any
Clicking on the link linked by your link, I get:
You are not authorised to view this resource.
You need to login.
The same links worked 3 hours ago.
Max Samukha Wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:35 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's me as well. The decision didn't go without a fight (I had your
viewpoint and Walter didn't). He convinced me with two arguments. One is
that 90% of the time you actually
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
On 10/30/09 06:08, dsimcha wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it, but it
at least basically works. I also still need
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst perhaps an overloaded keyword, is still much more
Lars T. Kyllingstad, el 30 de octubre a las 08:55 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 29 de octubre a las 16:06 me escribiste:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
What I cannot for the life of me understand is WHY the double
underscores? What's wrong with just traits?
Because D
dsimcha wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it, but it
at least basically works. I also still need to write the templates to
generate bit masks at compile time, but this is a
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I have *ever* even used
wchar/wstring.
Nick Sabalausky, el 29 de octubre a las 21:18 me escribiste:
If you use (or admin a project that requires) Tango trunk instead of
0.99.8: Why? (Select all that apply)
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/704493-212991
It's missing an answer: Tango doesn't release fast enough and doesn't
dsimcha, el 30 de octubre a las 05:08 me escribiste:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it, but it
at least basically works. I also still need to write the templates to
generate bit
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
This is great news. Hopefully you'll be willing to integrate your code
with druntime.
That was kind of the point all along. I'll file it in Bugzilla after I finish
the
bitmask generation, testing and debugging.
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
===
Such uninitialized
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about
void assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask,
I made this change to the incriminated paragraph:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst perhaps an overloaded keyword, is still
Leandro Lucarella:
If somebody have this, I'm very interested too.
Two D translations of the Olden Benchmarks, more to come:
http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/js/index.html
Bye,
bearophile
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
Leandro Lucarella:
If somebody have this, I'm very interested too.
Two D translations of the Olden Benchmarks, more to come:
http://www.fantascienza.net/leonardo/js/index.html
Bye,
bearophile
These might be worth a try, but
dsimcha:
These might be worth a try, but they're more benchmarks for performance than
tests
of correctness, if I understand correctly.
Yes, I understand. What kind of code are you looking for then?
Bye,
bearophile
Rainer Deyke wrote:
snip
What makes this case particularly bad is that Walter deliberate chose to
limit the power of the 'version' construct in order to prevent overly
complex read-only code.
Actually, AIUI it's just one of many things he did to eliminate the
syntactic fragility that C++ has
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
dsimcha:
These might be worth a try, but they're more benchmarks for performance
than tests
of correctness, if I understand correctly.
Yes, I understand. What kind of code are you looking for then?
Bye,
bearophile
I was just
Yes, I understand. What kind of code are you looking for then?
You have already answered, in a way. You need complex code that runs for a lot
of time, while keeping the total amount of memory used constant. You also
surely need some synthetic tests, to spot eventual bugs better. I don't know
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:08:10 +0300, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it,
but it
at least basically works. I also still need to write the
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
It's a rough rough draft, but one for the full chapter on arrays,
associative arrays, and strings.
http://erdani.com/d/thermopylae.pdf
Any feedback is welcome. Thanks!
I still think is
I've just caught up on this thread. Built-in dynamic arrays have been
one of D's major features since the early days. Now you're planning to
remove this feature?
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/builtin.html
states that the C++ STL has many types that have been created to
compensate for the
== Quote from Denis Koroskin (2kor...@gmail.com)'s article
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:08:10 +0300, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it,
but it
at
rmcguire wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 23/10/2009 13:02, bearophile wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls:
I prefer this (Scala):
list = list ++
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:05:27 +0300, rmcguire rjmcgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 23/10/2009 13:02, bearophile wrote:
Chris
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask, I
made this change to the
Saaa wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Could anybody clear these up for me?
p16. Is there anything other than the random values, unsafe about void
assignment?
I'd put your feedback on my pile of things to do, but now that you ask, I
made this change
Don Wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Justin Johansson, el 30 de octubre a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Actually, I think I like that better than 'traits'.
-Lars
I'm in agreement with whoever suggested 'meta' or just about anything else
except 'traits'.
'meta', whilst perhaps an
On 10/30/09 14:29, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
On 10/30/09 06:08, dsimcha wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it, but it
at least
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I don't believe I
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:08:10 +0300, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
scanning
into the GC. Right now, I still need to test it better and debug it,
but it
at least basically works. I also
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:hcdsbq$4i...@digitalmars.com...
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
scanning
into the GC.
Awesome! Thank you so much for doing this. Does the GC have knowledge of
pointers on both the stack as well as the
== Quote from Craig Black (craigbla...@cox.net)'s article
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:hcdsbq$4i...@digitalmars.com...
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
scanning
into the GC.
Awesome! Thank you so much for doing this. Does the GC
== Quote from Craig Black (craigbla...@cox.net)'s article
Does the GC have knowledge of
pointers on both the stack as well as the heap?
Also, probably most of the problem with false pointers is on the heap anyhow.
The
stack is usually on the order of a few 10s of kilobytes, the static data
Don wrote:
I'm starting to think we need a
separate namespace for the CT stuff.
D.compiles(XXX)
D.typeof(foo)
D.stringof(T)
D.allMembers(T)
That's not bad. Can't be 'D', though, has to look like a keyword. Maybe
something like 'traits' instead. In exchange, get rid of the
Is there any **good** way to iterate over the members fields of a class at
compile time via templates or CTFE? With structs you can do:
void someCtfeFunction(Struct)() {
foreach(tupleIndex, elem; Struct.init.tupleof) {
// Do stuff.
}
}
This doesn't work for classes because using
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:hcfu9t$9d...@digitalmars.com...
== Quote from Craig Black (craigbla...@cox.net)'s article
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:hcdsbq$4i...@digitalmars.com...
After a few evenings of serious hacking, I've integrated precise heap
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:hcfur2$av...@digitalmars.com...
== Quote from Craig Black (craigbla...@cox.net)'s article
Does the GC have knowledge of
pointers on both the stack as well as the heap?
Also, probably most of the problem with false pointers is on the heap
Justin Johansson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hcctuf$140...@digitalmars.com...
Granted LTR is common enough to be expectable and acceptable. To be
perfectly honest, I
Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote in message
news:hcg0qr$fc...@digitalmars.com...
Don wrote:
I'm starting to think we need a
separate namespace for the CT stuff.
D.compiles(XXX)
D.typeof(foo)
D.stringof(T)
D.allMembers(T)
That's not bad. Can't be 'D', though, has
Qian Xu Wrote:
albatroz Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Qian Xu Wrote:
Hi All,
I have almost built the first demo, but ...
The components I have are as follows:
1. QtK SDK (LGPL edition) 4.5.3
2. the latest svn version of QtD (trunk-r309.zip)
3. DMD 1.050
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
I saw you made the reference to this link
(http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd/wiki/MacCaseStudy which contains this
command line option, but still I don't understand why you get undefined
symbols like QPrintDialog::options() const which belongs to libQtGui.
Qian Xu Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
All Qt versions keep forward binary compatibility and a full compatibility
within a major version, 4.5.3 contains only bug fixes compared to 4.5.2.
Version from code.google.com is a way to old, so I would not even
consider it. Have you
Is there a some compiler switch to produce mixins output.
I mean [d_file_with_mixins] - [d_file_without_mixins].
Zarathustra schrieb:
Is there a some compiler switch to produce mixins output.
I mean [d_file_with_mixins] - [d_file_without_mixins].
No, Descent has such a feature though.
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:38:44 -0500, Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar
wrote:
Phil Deets wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:28:12 -0500, Ary Borenszweig
a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Unfortunately, that's going to be about the best you can do, unless
you're willing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #2 from Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net 2009-10-29
23:35:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
and in the case of const it is even considered well-defined
behaviour to change their value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=874
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect codegen with |Bad codegen: wrong value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=874
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3442
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2009-10-30 06:39:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
and in the case of const it is even considered well-defined
behaviour to change their
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-30
07:55:56 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't understand the reasoning behind this. The primary reason you use
-release is to turn off bounds checking, because
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-10-30 08:38:34 PDT ---
-safe: Do whatever the hell it takes to make sure my program never has a
memory error
-release: I've tested and debugged my programs, eliminate runtime design
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-30
08:51:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
-safe: Do whatever the hell it takes to make sure my program never has a
memory error
-release: I've tested and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3455
Summary: Some Unicode characters not allowed in identifiers
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3455
Matti Niemenmaa matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||spec
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsim...@yahoo.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3456
Summary: ref foreach over array in CTFE silently fails.
Product: D
Version: 2.035
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic, wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3455
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-30
11:40:05 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
As http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/lex.html#identifier very clearly states,
the allowed characters in identifiers are those
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||llu...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
--- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-10-30
17:21:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
LDC already have all the checks splat in different options:
$ ldc --help
[...]
-enable-asserts
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407
--- Comment #8 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2009-10-30 17:45:01
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
LDC already have all the checks splat in different options:
$ ldc --help
[...]
-enable-asserts
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3457
Summary: rdmd fails silently in a particular setup where the
compiler is not the expected
Product: D
Version: 1.051
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3458
Summary: int fsync(int) commented out in core.sys.posix.unistd
Product: D
Version: 2.035
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1638
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #199 is|0 |1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3459
Summary: There should be a flavor of file.listdir() that
returns a range instead of taking a delegate
Product: D
Version: 2.035
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3459
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3458
Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3443
Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
99 matches
Mail list logo
