On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:08:39 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
After a very long delay, Safari finally updated the TDPL draft on their
Rough Cuts service (http://my.safaribooksonline.com/roughcuts). They
claim things will be back to normal now, and that
Walter Bright wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I guess D can greatly benefit from a compiler that can compile and run
a multiple-files program with one command
dmd a b c -run args...
Can we have
dmd -resolve-deps-and-run main.d
I use rdmd when I can, but it doesn't manage to link C-libs in
retard wrote:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:38:29 +0100, Pelle Månsson wrote:
retard wrote:
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:58:25 -0500, bearophile wrote:
Rainer Deyke:
open by itself is ambiguous. What are you opening? A window? A
network port? I think the word file needs to be in there somewhere
to
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I guess D can greatly benefit from a compiler that can compile and run
a multiple-files program with one command
dmd a b c -run args...
Can we have
dmd -resolve-deps-and-run main.d
I use rdmd when I can, but it doesn't
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I guess D can greatly benefit from a compiler that can compile and run
a multiple-files program with one command
dmd a b c -run args...
Can we have
dmd -resolve-deps-and-run main.d
I use rdmd
retard wrote:
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:40:21 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:58:43 -0500, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:41:46 +0300, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:20:06 -0500, Denis Koroskin
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I guess D can greatly benefit from a compiler that can compile and run
a multiple-files program with one command (AFAIK rdmd only support one
file programs, right?) and an interactive console that can get the ddoc
documentation on the fly. But that's not very
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm amazed that virtually nobody uses rdmd. I can hardly fathom how I
managed to make-do without it.
Andrei
rdmd is a life saver, I use it all the time.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 1 de diciembre a las 13:45 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I develop twice as fast in Python than in D. Of course this is only me,
but that's where I think Python is better than D :)
If that is not just because
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-11-30 18:45:38 -0500, Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar said:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:hf03ps$lk...@digitalmars.com...
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
c) If a class doesn't define any constructors but does
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
open by itself is ambiguous. What are you opening? A window? A
network port? I think the word file needs to be in there somewhere to
disambiguate.
Something like new BufferedReader(new FileReader(foo.txt))? It's quite
unambiguous.
No, like
Hello retard,
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:24:01 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
My biggest gripe about static verification is that it can't help you
at all with high-level logic/algorithmic errors, only lower level
coding errors. Good unit tests (and good asserts), on the other
hand,
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:01:41 +0300, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:06:27 -0500, Pelle Månsson
pelle.mans...@gmail.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Isn't opBinary almost
retard wrote:
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:24:01 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Unit tests have their limitations as well. Unit tests cannot prove a
function is pure, for example.
Sure, unit tests can't prove that.
Both unit tests and static verification are needed.
But it doesn't lead to this
retard wrote:
The thing is, nowadays when all development should follow the principles
of clean code (book), agile, and tdd/bdd, this cannot happen. You write
tests first, then the production code. They say that writing tests and
code takes less time than writing only the more or less buggy
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:16:58 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
The thing is, nowadays when all development should follow the
principles of clean code (book), agile, and tdd/bdd, this cannot
happen. You write tests first, then the production code. They say that
writing tests and code
retard wrote:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:16:58 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
The thing is, nowadays when all development should follow the
principles of clean code (book), agile, and tdd/bdd, this cannot
happen. You write tests first, then the production code. They say that
writing tests
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:12:58 +0100, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
std.conv.to() to the rescue! :)
import std.conv;
...
row[] a = sql_engine.execute(select * from foobar;).result;
int b = to!int(a[0][0]); // Throws if conversions fail
string c = to!string(a[0][1]);
Have you heard of language called Vala? They came to the same idea - C# is a
scripting language for web apps, but it's not suitable for demanding
applications.
I myself used Delphi for a long time because Object Pascal provided me with all
the modern features and modern IDE that left
Zexx Wrote:
I myself used Delphi for a long time because Object Pascal provided me with
all the modern features and modern IDE that left competitors in dust.
Especiall Microsoft's pityful Visual Studio 6. Unfortunately, Microsoft
responded by buying shares of Borland, made them go NET
Yeah, they do. Ever tried using it? :)
Frank Bolton Wrote:
Zexx Wrote:
I myself used Delphi for a long time because Object Pascal provided me with
all the modern features and modern IDE that left competitors in dust.
Especiall Microsoft's pityful Visual Studio 6. Unfortunately,
== Quote from retard (r...@tard.com.invalid)'s article
I thought D was supposed to be a practical language for real world
problems. This 'D is good because everything can and must be written in
D' is beginning to sound like a religion.
You're missing the point. Mixing languages always adds
Zexx Wrote:
Yeah, they do. Ever tried using it? :)
Frank Bolton Wrote:
Zexx Wrote:
I myself used Delphi for a long time because Object Pascal provided me
with all the modern features and modern IDE that left competitors in
dust. Especiall Microsoft's pityful Visual
Zexx Wrote:
Have you heard of language called Vala? They came to the same idea - C# is a
scripting language for web apps, but it's not suitable for demanding
applications.
I myself used Delphi for a long time because Object Pascal provided me with
all the modern features and modern IDE
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Lutger lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
The feature isn't very dynamic since the dispatch rules are defined
statically. The only thing
retard:
Also IIRC Python has built-in print() command. What if I want to
redefine this to mean printing to a graphical quake like game console.
In Python3 there is a built-in print function, that is a reference to a
callable object. So you just need to redefine it, like this:
def print(...):
Walter Bright:
But with mechanical checking, you can guarantee certain things.
Usually what mechanical checking guarantee is not even vaguely enough, and such
guarantee aren't even about the most important parts :-)
Unit tests are more important, because they cover things that matter more.
dsimcha:
because Python's builtin arrays are too slow.
Python lists are not badly implemented, it's the interpreter that's slow (*).
Python built-in arrays (lists) are dynamically typed, so they are less
efficient but more flexible. NumPy arrays are the opposite. So as usual with
data
Hello bearophile,
But in dynamic code you don't almost never assert that a variable is
an int; you assert that 'a' is able to do its work where it's used. So
'a' can often be an int, decimal, a multiprecision long, a GMP
multiprecision, or maybe even a float. What you care of it not what a
is
Zexx Wrote:
The creators of D and Vala know why they created it. Maybe there are other
similar projects. But why work separately? There's no chance for success when
working like that.
It looks to me as though this should be asked of the Vala devs. Vala does have
a different goal than that
Hello dsimcha,
My biggest gripe about static verification is that it can't help you
at all with high-level logic/algorithmic errors, only lower level
coding errors. Good unit tests (and good asserts), on the other hand,
are invaluable for finding and debugging high-level logic and
algorithmic
Hello Denis,
What if you don't know argument names a-priori? Consider a generic
Dynamic class that has nothing but a single opDispatch method.
you can do whatever logic you want, even (I think) aliasing the function
template opDispatch(string s)
{
static if(WhateverLogicYouNeed!(s))
Hello Leandro,
If you say dynamic languages don't have metaprogramming capabilities,
you just don't have any idea of what a dynamic language really is.
If you say you can do metaprogramming at runtime you just don't have any
idea of what I want to do with metaprogramming. For example:
== Quote from BCS (n...@anon.com)'s article
Hello dsimcha,
My biggest gripe about static verification is that it can't help you
at all with high-level logic/algorithmic errors, only lower level
coding errors. Good unit tests (and good asserts), on the other hand,
are invaluable for
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:22:01 -0500, retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote:
You don't seem to have any idea what the term 'dynamic' means. From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language
I'm sure the first person who suggested C++ templates were a functional
language was shown
Hello dsimcha,
== Quote from BCS (n...@anon.com)'s article
I don't have a link or anything but I remember hearing about a study
MS did
about finding bugs and what they found is that every reasonably
effective
tool they looked at found the same amount of bugs (ok, within
shouting distance,
After a very long delay, Safari finally updated the TDPL draft on their
Rough Cuts service (http://my.safaribooksonline.com/roughcuts). They
claim things will be back to normal now, and that another update
(containing almost the entire book) is due in a week.
Andrei
Sean Kelly wrote:
It's easier because it could be built into the Druntime/Phobos makefiles
and not rely on a release script or manual effort to actually happen.
Are you saying that a SVN one-liner once per release requires too much
effort on Walter's side?
Apart from that, I don't quite see
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=specificorder=relevance+descbug_status=__open__product=content=
and the d bug list with 1,403 open
BCS, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:37 me escribiste:
Hello Leandro,
If you say dynamic languages don't have metaprogramming capabilities,
you just don't have any idea of what a dynamic language really is.
If you say you can do metaprogramming at runtime you just don't have
any idea of
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Leandro Lucarella, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:53 me escribiste:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Hello Leandro,
BCS, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:37 me escribiste:
Hello Leandro,
If you say dynamic languages don't have metaprogramming
capabilities, you just don't have any idea of what a dynamic
language really is.
If you say you can do metaprogramming at runtime you just don't have
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
BCS, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:37 me escribiste:
Hello Leandro,
If you say dynamic languages don't have metaprogramming capabilities,
you just don't have any idea of what a dynamic language really is.
If you say you can do metaprogramming at runtime you just
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:53 me escribiste:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Leandro Lucarella, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:53 me escribiste:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug
list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:16:28 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Leandro,
Again *optimization*. How many times should I say that I agree that D
is better than almost every dynamic languages if you need speed?
I'm not arguing on that point. What I'm arguing is that (at least for
me) the primary
I've been working on making std.variant work seamlessly with delegates
the last day and a half - the last piece to making std.javascript_in_d :)
and am almost there - just have one thing that I either haven't solved or
adequately worked around* so far: opCall.
The spec says that static opCall is
BCS, el 2 de diciembre a las 21:16 me escribiste:
Hello Leandro,
BCS, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:37 me escribiste:
Hello Leandro,
If you say dynamic languages don't have metaprogramming
capabilities, you just don't have any idea of what a dynamic
language really is.
If you say you
Leandro Lucarella Wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Don, el 2 de diciembre a las 22:20 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
BCS, el 2 de diciembre a las 17:37 me escribiste:
Hello Leandro,
If you say dynamic languages don't have metaprogramming capabilities,
you just don't have any idea of what a dynamic language really is.
If you
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:48:14 +0100, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug
list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 13:29 me escribiste:
I'd like to compare the user base and calculate the bugs/users ratio.
I guess GCC's would be orders of magnitude smaller.
And BTW, GCC implements 7 languages (at least 7 languages are present as
bugzilla components: ada, c, c++,
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 2 de diciembre a las 13:03 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
Pelle Månsson wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
open by itself is ambiguous. What are you opening? A window? A
network port? I think the word file needs to be in there somewhere to
disambiguate.
Something like new BufferedReader(new FileReader(foo.txt))? It's quite
Don wrote:
Interesting question. It'll be some kind of binomial distibution, I
imagine. The more users you have, the higher the fraction of the total
number of bugs that you find. Bug reports ought to follow a logistic
curve: a small number of bugs means that you have very few users, or
that
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 13:29 me escribiste:
I'd like to compare the user base and calculate the bugs/users ratio.
I guess GCC's would be orders of magnitude smaller.
And BTW, GCC implements 7 languages (at least 7 languages are present as
bugzilla
Say I want to present a file as an input range:
class RangeFile {
bool empty() {...}
ubyte front() {...}
void popFront() {...}
// some private stuff
}
I'm parsing it. There are chunks, one byte for size then data of that size:
void parse(RangeFile rf) {
while (!rf.empty) {
BCS wrote:
I'm not arguing on that point. What I'm arguing is that (at least for
me) the primary advantages of metaprogramming are static checks (for
non-perf benefits) and performance. Both of these must be done at
compile time. Runtime metaprogramming just seems pointless *to me.*
One of
Hello Leandro,
Don, el 2 de diciembre a las 22:20 me escribiste:
They are metaprogramming tasks. Dynamic languages can do some
metaprogramming tasks. They can't do those ones.
Because they make no sense, I really don't know how to put it. If you
need speed, you code in C/C++/D whatever.
Hello Sergey,
BCS wrote:
I'm not arguing on that point. What I'm arguing is that (at least for
me) the primary advantages of metaprogramming are static checks (for
non-perf benefits) and performance. Both of these must be done at
compile time. Runtime metaprogramming just seems pointless *to
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, BCS n...@anon.com wrote:
Hello Sergey,
BCS wrote:
I'm not arguing on that point. What I'm arguing is that (at least for
me) the primary advantages of metaprogramming are static checks (for
non-perf benefits) and performance. Both of these must be done at
retard wrote:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:16:28 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Leandro,
Again *optimization*. How many times should I say that I agree that D
is better than almost every dynamic languages if you need speed?
I'm not arguing on that point. What I'm arguing is that (at least for
me) the
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Leandro Lucarella Wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list with 5,442 open issues:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 13:29 me escribiste:
I'd like to compare the user base and calculate the bugs/users ratio.
I guess GCC's would be orders of magnitude smaller.
And BTW, GCC implements 7 languages (at least 7 languages are present as
bugzilla
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 2 de diciembre a las 13:03 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 12:23 me escribiste:
l8night wrote:
Too many bugs - no way my superiors allow some program with that bug list
Here's the gcc bug list
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:00:50 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
retard wrote:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:16:28 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Leandro,
Again *optimization*. How many times should I say that I agree that D
is better than almost every dynamic languages if you need speed?
I'm not arguing on
retard wrote:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:00:50 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
retard wrote:
Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:16:28 +, BCS wrote:
Hello Leandro,
Again *optimization*. How many times should I say that I agree that D
is better than almost every dynamic languages if you need speed?
I'm not
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way, unstable,
and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the compiler will
continue to get support, no one in the community knows what the library support
will be like. I came across an article where even Python wasn't
Sergey Gromov wrote:
Say I want to present a file as an input range:
class RangeFile {
bool empty() {...}
ubyte front() {...}
void popFront() {...}
// some private stuff
}
I'm parsing it. There are chunks, one byte for size then data of that
size:
void parse(RangeFile rf) {
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sergey Gromov wrote:
There are actually two issues:
1. Most of the std.algorithm and std.range functions claim that they
accept input ranges but take them *by value*. This violates input
ranges' non-copyable contract.
2. A whole bunch of algorithms is required
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Bubble sort is perfeclty acceptable for, say, a 100 elements array.
It always depends on the context, of course, but when doing programs that
deals with small data sets and are mostly IO bounded, you *really* can
care less about performance and big-O.
The thing
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 14:46 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 2 de diciembre a las 13:29 me escribiste:
I'd like to compare the user base and calculate the bugs/users ratio.
I guess GCC's would be orders of magnitude smaller.
And BTW, GCC implements
Jesse Phillips wrote:
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way,
unstable, and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the
compiler will continue to get support, no one in the community knows
what the library support will be like. I came across an article
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe you could comment on patches, and tell people how to fix them to be
accepted, that help a lot when you're willing to contribute. It's really
frustrating when you make a patch and it's not accepted (or delayed) and
you don't know why. This way
Walter Bright wrote:
One of the comments in there:
One of the greatest problems I found when trying Common Lisp was the
large number of implementations and the disorganization of the library
space. It is hard for a newcomer to decide which libraries are
available, which are maintained,
On 03.12.2009 1:13, Jesse Phillips wrote:
This has come up as one issue for adoption to D. D2.x is on its way, unstable,
and D1.x is getting the ax. While Walter has said that the compiler will
continue to get support, no one in the community knows what the library support
will be like. I
This is quite an interesting feature with a very good design that AMD is
introducing. I could be worthwhile adding support for this, in the D
programming language !
Introduction:
Performance Profiling Without the Overhead
Here at AMD, we know that in order to improve program
Disclaimer: Within a finite amount of time, I wrote this quickly, fully
explaining the finer details would take a lonnng time ;)
Concise Summary:
D language popularity can increase dramatically if:
* C++ support is improved
* D is ported to .Net
* D is ported to JVM
* Driver-run grassroots
See
http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/
Does any know anything about the library ?
This library seems to do a lot of things that this community whats to
do with D, although it is written in C++.
It seems to allow the user to write code that will run of multiple cores
Any downside or
If a function throws a class inheriting Error but not Exception (i.e. an
unrecoverable error), then the postcondition doesn't need to be satisfied.
I just realized that postconditions, however, must be satisfied if the
function throws an Exception-derived object. There is no more return
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If a function throws a class inheriting Error but not Exception (i.e. an
unrecoverable error), then the postcondition doesn't need to be satisfied.
I just realized that postconditions, however, must be satisfied if the
function throws an Exception-derived object.
Clay Smith wrote:
* D is ported to .Net
Cristian Vlasceanu already ported D to .NET.
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If a function throws a class inheriting Error but not Exception (i.e.
an unrecoverable error), then the postcondition doesn't need to be
satisfied.
I just realized that postconditions, however, must be satisfied if the
function throws an
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If a function throws a class inheriting Error but not Exception (i.e.
an unrecoverable error), then the postcondition doesn't need to be
satisfied.
I just realized that postconditions, however, must be satisfied if the
function throws an
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
An exception (not an Error) is an expected and documented outcome of a
function. After having listened to those endless Boeing stories, please
listen to this one :o). Contract Programming covers the correctness of a
program, and exceptions are correct behavior. By
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
An exception (not an Error) is an expected and documented outcome of a
function. After having listened to those endless Boeing stories,
please listen to this one :o). Contract Programming covers the
correctness of a program, and exceptions are
Jesse Phillips wrote:
Well, part of the problem is that you can use all of those arguments
against D (That includes the complaint about Lisp). Maybe not if you
just look at D1 or just D2, and many times the complaints aren't as
big an issue as they are made out to be once you start using the
Brad Roberts wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
An exception (not an Error) is an expected and documented outcome of a
function. After having listened to those endless Boeing stories,
please listen to this one :o). Contract Programming covers the
correctness of a program,
Clay Smith wrote:
...
* D is ported to JVM
http://da.vidr.cc/projects/lljvm/
Of course this doesn't mean it exists, but may just be a good lead for
someone who wants to make it happen. Just make ldc use this, and
eventually write java library backends for the std libs.
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If a function throws a class inheriting Error but not Exception (i.e. an
unrecoverable error), then the postcondition doesn't need to be satisfied.
I just realized that postconditions, however, must be satisfied if
hi,
gcc is widely used for a long time and everybody knows it has bug. it seems
like a case, that is regulated by the fda. if a software is used more than
25 time it is regarded as being validated. this is not the case here and
everybody perceives d as being utterly new, even if it is
Rory McGuire wrote:
I would think that if a method in a class throws then at least the class'
invariant should be run? does it?
No.
Simplified test case:
class foo {
class bar {
pragma( msg, typeof( this.outer ).stringof );
}
}
Test.d(3): Error: variable this forward referenced
While I understand I cannot do any operations on this.outer,
getting its type and reacting to that ought to be within the
realms of
I was trying out composite oriented programming, meaning moving class
functionality into templates which you then mixin.
First part mixined just fine, second also ok, third . .
- Error : Out of memory (2GB VM)
Even with an empty template :(
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3564
Summary: Rdmd failing to link external C libraries
Product: D
Version: 2.034
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3565
Summary: rdmd --man doesn't work on Windows
Product: D
Version: 2.036
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3481
to...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||to...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #12 from
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
