Am 08.10.2010 03:16, schrieb Austin Hastings:
On 10/6/2010 4:00 PM, Yao G. wrote:
I forgot to mention. I'm compiling the file using:
dmd test.d C:\dmd\src\stacktrace.d C:\dmd\src\dbghelp.d -g -w
I have a similar problem as Yao.
I've got XP SP3/x86 with dbghelp.dll version 5.1.2600.5512
On 17/09/2010 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/17/10 10:48 CDT, Michel Fortin wrote:
In my mind it's simpler to just explain the notion that an uninitialized
hash is null and detached from anything else until initialized. Objects
works like this (minus the implicit initialization part),
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/dohif/go_vs_d_interesting_thread_on_the_go_mailing_list/
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:50:25 +0400, Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
I wrote a small piece of sourcecode that generates stacktraces in D 2.0
under
windows. It works both with the pdb and cv debug symbol format. For
Exceptions
that are derived from the Error class the trace
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
I modified druntime to support stack-tracing for all kind of exceptions.
It's very simple:
1) In object_.d, change traceContext() function linkage to C:
extern(C) Throwable.TraceInfo traceContext(void* ptr = null) { ... }
2) In rt\deh.c, declare
Interface*
On 10/8/2010 2:46 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hm I don't have a XP machine to test on. But as Symbol 04 is resolved,
it seems to work. It just can not resolve symbols inside your
application. There is no upper limit to dbghelp.dll. I'm on Windows 7
with dbghelp version 6.1.7600.16385. Most likely
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:36:30 +0400, Austin Hastings ah0801...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On 10/8/2010 2:46 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hm I don't have a XP machine to test on. But as Symbol 04 is resolved,
it seems to work. It just can not resolve symbols inside your
application. There is no upper
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:04:35 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
There have been a couple of looong threads about tuples:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/
Reddit_why_aren_t_people_using_D_93528.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/
On 10/08/2010 03:18 AM, Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:53:13 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Except that when you're dealing with generic code which has to deal
with
multiple container types (like std.algorithm), you _need_ certain
complexity
guarantees about
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:55:12 +0200, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Russel Winder wrote:
So the ability to improve performance of code by just waiting and buying
new kit is over -- at least for now. If you do not turn your serial
code into parallel code there will be no
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 14:44:50 Stanislav Blinov wrote:
But that is not a matter of library interface isn't it? It's a matter of
algorithm/container choice. It's not the push_back that was slow in the
end, it was std::vector (yes, that's arguable, but the point
2010/10/7 Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
In the end I figured there was only _one_
quadratic operation - appending to a vectorsize_t that held document
lengths. That wasn't even the bulk of the data and it was the last thing I
looked at! Yet it made the run time impossible
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
Personally, I don't think we should start adding a dedicated tuple syntax
at this point. There are so many things that are more important, and
besides, I think the library tuples are pretty cool. We should instead
focus on making Tuple!(...) even better.
Tuples are
On Friday 08 October 2010 03:30:35 bearophile wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
Personally, I don't think we should start adding a dedicated tuple syntax
at this point. There are so many things that are more important, and
besides, I think the library tuples are pretty cool. We should instead
On Friday 08 October 2010 03:06:01 Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Yet still, generality ends at some point. You can't devise every
possible algorithm for any possible types and have it have set-in-stone
complexity independently of types.
Take std.range.popFrontN(). It's generic, and it's used in
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:30:35 -0400, bearophile wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
Personally, I don't think we should start adding a dedicated tuple
syntax at this point. There are so many things that are more
important, and besides, I think the library tuples are pretty cool. We
should instead
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:28:59 -0400, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2010-10-07 18:53:51 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Input == Input to the program i.e. not known during compilation of
the program.
Sorry, but my interpretation in this
On 07/10/2010 12:47, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
07.10.2010 14:38, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 06/10/2010 16:59, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
I always thought that the term itself came from language specification,
i.e. the paper that *defines* behavior of the language and states that
there are cases when
Pelle Wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:18 AM, Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:53:13 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Except that when you're dealing with generic code which has to deal
with
multiple container types (like std.algorithm), you _need_ certain
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:18:56 -0400, Juanjo Alvarez f...@fakeemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:53:13 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Except that when you're dealing with generic code which has to deal
with
multiple container types (like std.algorithm), you _need_
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:07:55 -0400, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com
wrote:
On 10/7/2010 14:33, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:47 -0400, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com
wrote:
I can't say I've ever cared about the big-O complexity of an operation.
Then you don't
On 8/10/2010 9:30 PM, bearophile wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
Personally, I don't think we should start adding a dedicated tuple syntax
at this point. There are so many things that are more important, and
besides, I think the library tuples are pretty cool. We should instead
focus on making
== Quote from Eric Poggel (dnewsgro...@yage3d.net)'s article
Is this duck-typing for D?
It looks more like something that would allow you to take a non-
polymorphic class and make it polymorphic. e.g. you have a Square
class and a Circle class, both with a draw() method, but with no
common base
There's a lot of (imho, pointless) discussion going on about
tuples in D.
I've asked before and haven't any illumination, especially of Walter.
In the context of D, can someone please enlighten me as to exactly
what a tuple is supposed to be.
The discussion so far appears to me to be focusing
On 2010-10-08 08:37:39 -0400, Justin Johansson n...@spam.com said:
There's a lot of (imho, pointless) discussion going on about
tuples in D.
I've asked before and haven't any illumination, especially of Walter.
In the context of D, can someone please enlighten me as to exactly
what a tuple is
Someone was asking about UFC syntax for properties on d.learn, and I
realized, we have a huge ambiguity here.
Given a function:
@property int foo(int x)
Is this a global setter or a getter on an int?
i.e.
int y = foo = 3;
or
int y = (3).foo;
???
I know arrays have an issue with
On 10/8/10 5:24 CDT, Torarin wrote:
2010/10/7 Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
In the end I figured there was only _one_
quadratic operation - appending to a vectorsize_t that held document
lengths. That wasn't even the bulk of the data and it was the last thing I
looked at!
08.10.2010 16:55, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
Someone was asking about UFC syntax for properties on d.learn, and I
realized, we have a huge ambiguity here.
Given a function:
@property int foo(int x)
Is this a global setter or a getter on an int?
i.e.
int y = foo = 3;
or
int y = (3).foo;
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:55:43 -0700
Walter == Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Walter What we may be seeing here is an effect I noticed decades ago
Walter with the Zortech compiler. Let's say you have the Zortech
Walter compiler, and BrandX compiler.
Heh...I remember Zortech
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:26:41 +0400, Stanislav Blinov bli...@loniir.ru
wrote:
08.10.2010 16:55, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
Someone was asking about UFC syntax for properties on d.learn, and I
realized, we have a huge ambiguity here.
Given a function:
@property int foo(int x)
Is this a
Justin Johansson wrote:
There's a lot of (imho, pointless) discussion going on about
tuples in D.
I've asked before and haven't any illumination, especially of Walter.
In the context of D, can someone please enlighten me as to exactly
what a tuple is supposed to be.
The discussion so
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:18:56 -0400, Juanjo Alvarez f...@fakeemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:53:13 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Except that when you're dealing with generic code which has to deal
with
multiple container
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:30:59 -0400, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com
wrote:
C# uses 'this' keyword for that purpose:
@property int set(this int x, int y)
{
x = y;
}
@property int get(this const(int) x)
{
return x;
}
int a = 1;
a.set(42); // a is 42 now
3.set(42); // fails to
Juanjo Alvarez juan...@gmail.com wrote:
True! And that's the only drawback I see on generalizing in, but there
are many things in programming languages that doesn't feel right when
you don't
know the language well. That doesn't mean that D should be the
programming for dummies on rails
On 10/8/10 7:55 CDT, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Someone was asking about UFC syntax for properties on d.learn, and I
realized, we have a huge ambiguity here.
Given a function:
@property int foo(int x)
Is this a global setter or a getter on an int?
Good question.
Andrei
Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:18:56 -0400, Juanjo Alvarez f...@fakeemail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:53:13 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Except that when you're dealing with generic code which has to deal
with
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:28:41 -0700
SK == SK s...@metrokings.com wrote:
SK Why labor over buggy Makefiles when you could be laboring over buggy
SK CMake files at a much more productive level of abstraction? :o)
Do you recommend to learn use CMake instead of using tools like
Xfbuild (I'm
08.10.2010 17:46, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:30:59 -0400, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com
wrote:
C# uses 'this' keyword for that purpose:
@property int set(this int x, int y)
{
x = y;
}
@property int get(this const(int) x)
{
return x;
}
int a = 1;
On 10/08/2010 01:45 PM, Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
Pelle Wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:18 AM, Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:53:13 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Except that when you're dealing with generic code which has to deal
with
multiple container types (like
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 16:34 +0200, Gour D. wrote:
Do you recommend to learn use CMake instead of using tools like
Xfbuild (I'm interested for D project and, so far, was accustomed to
Haskell's Cabal, so looking for similar experience.)
For C, C++, Fortran, and hence D, I personally find
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 19:39 +0200, Daniel Gibson wrote:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode
Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from august 2009
Grrr (minor rant in next paragraph.)
Why is it that programmers can even think that a wiki is a
On 10/08/2010 02:37 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
There's a lot of (imho, pointless) discussion going on about
tuples in D.
I've asked before and haven't any illumination, especially of Walter.
In the context of D, can someone please enlighten me as to exactly
what a tuple is supposed to be.
Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 19:39 +0200, Daniel Gibson wrote:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?EditorSupport/EmacsDMode
Seems to be a bit more up to date.. there is a patch from august 2009
Grrr (minor rant in next paragraph.)
Why is it that
Tomek S.
But I got a feeling we're heading for an overkill :)
Yes, that's overkill, and it's not a good solution. But sometimes it's useful
to discuss even bad solutions to problems, because they may lead to different
and more acceptable solutions. During brainstorming you need to lower the
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:26:25 +0100
Russel == Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
Russel For C, C++, Fortran, and hence D, I personally find CMake
Russel awkward and clumsy.
Hmm...based on what I know, CMake is universe for itself...not the
most readable syntax etc., but it looks robust,
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:47 -0400, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com
wrote:
On 10/7/2010 13:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/7/10 14:40 CDT, bearophile wrote:
Another solution is just to accept O(n) as the worst complexity for
the in operator. I don't
Juanjo Alvarez wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:14:12 -0400, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
This is false both in Python2 and Python3.
What is exactly false on what I said?
python
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 1 2010, 05:28:39)
[GCC 4.4.3 20100316 (prerelease)] on linux2
Type
2010/10/8 Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:47 -0400, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com
wrote:
On 10/7/2010 13:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/7/10 14:40 CDT, bearophile wrote:
Another solution is just to accept O(n) as the
Do you recommend to learn use CMake instead of using tools like
Xfbuild (I'm interested for D project and, so far, was accustomed to
Haskell's Cabal, so looking for similar experience.)
For C, C++, Fortran, and hence D, I personally find CMake awkward and
clumsy.
I also think CMake
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:op.vj9cunrweav...@localhost.localdomain...
Someone was asking about UFC syntax for properties on d.learn, and I
realized, we have a huge ambiguity here.
Given a function:
@property int foo(int x)
Is this a global setter or a
On Friday, October 08, 2010 13:56:14 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:op.vj9cunrweav...@localhost.localdomain...
Someone was asking about UFC syntax for properties on d.learn, and I
realized, we have a huge ambiguity here.
Given a
== Quote from Sean Kelly (s...@invisibleduck.org)'s article
Sean Kelly Wrote:
osa Wrote:
I started using std.concurrency in some projects and overall it feels
like a solid (albeit minimalistic) design. However, current
implementation has some issues. For example, I've noticed that
On 10/08/2010 04:29 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
I just made some functional changes to how priority messages are sent and added
a few performance tweaks to messaging in general. The only visible
difference should be that PriorityMessageException is no longer a template
class but instead contains a
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.483.1286572389.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Friday, October 08, 2010 13:56:14 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Additionally, with that understanding in place, this:
@property void foo(int x) {...}
(3).foo();
Is probably
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday 08 October 2010 03:06:01 Stanislav Blinov wrote:
[...]
What I mean is you'll always have algorithms that will perform
differently for different containers, and you'll always have to choose
containers that best fit your needs [...]
All true. However, the
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
I know, and I agree that *if* it is decided that tuples should be added to the
language, it has to happen now. I just don't think it's necessary to do it at
all.
A better built-in support for tuples is a form of syntax sugar, this means it
doesn't give you more power, it
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:47 -0400, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com
wrote:
On 10/7/2010 13:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/7/10 14:40 CDT, bearophile wrote:
Another solution is just to accept O(n) as the worst complexity for
the
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:41:55 +0200
Jens == Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de wrote:
Jens I also think CMake isn't that shiny. But you can get the job done
Jens once you're familiar with it. And it has been adopted by some big
Jens projects: Blender 3D, Boost, clang, KDE, LLVM, MiKTeX, MySQL (see
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/dohif/go_vs_d_interesting_thread_on_the_go_mailing_list/
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/dohif/go_vs_d_interesting_thread_on_the_go_mailing_list/
Walter has just put the same link in the announce newsgroup.
Few quotations and comments from/about that Reddit page:
we need a compiler which is good at type inference
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:11:53 -0400, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
This syntax you have explained doesn't do what you think it does:
a, b, c, _ = ('tuple', 'of', 'three')
That was a typo, I meant to write:
a, b, _ = ('tuple', 'of', 'three')
bearophile wrote:
Following a short trail of links I've found this page, about how C# tests its
variable initialization, it's quite cute:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definite_assignment_analysis D is less smart and
more rough here, but to invent and implement this you may need more than one
Juanjo Alvarez, el 9 de octubre a las 04:02 me escribiste:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:11:53 -0400, bearophile
bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
This syntax you have explained doesn't do what you think it does:
a, b, c, _ = ('tuple', 'of', 'three')
That was a typo, I meant to write:
a, b, _ =
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:i8ofc0$il...@digitalmars.com...
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/dohif/go_vs_d_interesting_thread_on_the_go_mailing_list/
Andrei
Hey, cool, someone (Netcob) over ther quoted me :) I'm a virus!
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue so I wonder which is the correct way to
do this:
vec4 Normalize() const { ... } //won't work, not a lvalue
ref vec4 Normalize() const {
vec4 temp;
...
return temp;
} //will this lead to a
On 07/10/2010 21:32, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
What I'd propose is either:
1) Create your own lock-free associative array (yup, reinvent the
wheel to introduce AA to the world of 'shared')
2) In this small case it may seem best (though mind that often such
cases
Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 07/10/2010 21:32, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
What I'd propose is either:
1) Create your own lock-free associative array (yup, reinvent the
wheel to introduce AA to the world of 'shared')
2) In this small case it may seem best (though mind that
Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue so I wonder which is the correct way to
do this:
vec4 Normalize() const { ... } //won't work, not a lvalue
ref vec4 Normalize() const {
vec4 temp;
...
return temp;
Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue so I wonder which is the correct way to
do this:
vec4 Normalize() const { ... } //won't work, not a lvalue
ref vec4 Normalize() const {
vec4
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:33:22 +0200, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue so I wonder which is the correct way to
do this:
vec4 Normalize() const { ... } //won't work, not a lvalue
ref vec4 Normalize()
Hi,
I'm learning D right now and got a question about property.
I tried to add a property for built-in type like the following
@property bool equalZero(double a) { return a == 0.0; }
void main()
{
...
double x = 4.4;
bool isXZero = x.equalZero;
...
}
but got an error message
main.d(75):
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:19:43 +0400, %u djvsr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning D right now and got a question about property.
I tried to add a property for built-in type like the following
@property bool equalZero(double a) { return a == 0.0; }
void main()
{
...
double x = 4.4;
bool
08.10.2010 16:19, %u wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning D right now and got a question about property.
I tried to add a property for built-in type like the following
@property bool equalZero(double a) { return a == 0.0; }
void main()
{
...
double x = 4.4;
bool isXZero = x.equalZero;
...
}
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:26:19 -0400, Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Am 08.10.2010 11:13, schrieb Lars T. Kyllingstad:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:33:22 +0200, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a vec4 math struct and I have a method of which the
return value has to be a lvalue
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
The correct way is to use auto ref as the parameter:
struct vec4
{
...
vec4 Normalize(auto ref const(vec4) param) {...}
}
But AFAIK, this doesn't really work.
It doesn't, no. I'm not even sure it's scheduled for inclusion.
Also, with
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:51:59 -0400, Simen kjaeraas
simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
The correct way is to use auto ref as the parameter:
struct vec4
{
...
vec4 Normalize(auto ref const(vec4) param) {...}
}
But AFAIK, this doesn't really
/The following binary expressions are evaluated in an implementation-defined
order:
AssignExpression/../AddExpression/
/It is an error to depend on order of evaluation when it is not specified./
That makes this an error!?
y = x + 1;
Am I being paranoid or should I be adding more brackets?
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:25:36 +0200, vano wrote:
The code below:
module used;
import std.stdio;
class ClassA {
this() { writeln(A ctor); }
~this() { writeln(A dtor); }
}
static this() { writeln(used.sctor); }
%u:
That makes this an error!?
y = x + 1;
Am I being paranoid or should I be adding more brackets?
I presume this doesn't need other brackets.
And Walter has two or three times stated that he wants to eventually define the
order of evaluation in D (as C#/Java), I hope this will happen.
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:49:36 +0400, %u e...@ee.com wrote:
/The following binary expressions are evaluated in an
implementation-defined
order:
AssignExpression/../AddExpression/
/It is an error to depend on order of evaluation when it is not
specified./
That makes this an error!?
y = x +
== Quote from Denis Koroskin (2kor...@gmail.com)'s article
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:49:36 +0400, %u e...@ee.com wrote:
/The following binary expressions are evaluated in an
implementation-defined
order:
AssignExpression/../AddExpression/
/It is an error to depend on order of evaluation
I've been running into a few problems with regular expressions in D. One
of the issues I've had recently is matching strings with non ascii
characters. As an example:
auto re = regex( `(.*)\.txt`, i );
re.printProgram();
auto m = match( bà.txt, re );
writefln( '%s', m.captures[1]
More of an English question...
dunno - don't know
ditto - ?
--
Tomek
On Friday, October 08, 2010 14:13:36 petevi...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I've been running into a few problems with regular expressions in D. One
of the issues I've had recently is matching strings with non ascii
characters. As an example:
auto re = regex( `(.*)\.txt`, i );
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:22:33 -0500, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
More of an English question...
dunno - don't know
ditto - ?
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ditto
ditto (plural dittos)
1. That which was stated before, the aforesaid, the above, the same.
2. (informal) A duplicate or copy
On Friday, October 08, 2010 14:22:33 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
More of an English question...
dunno - don't know
ditto - ?
It's a word in and of itself, not the shortening or butchering of another word.
According to merriam-webster.com ( http://www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/ditto ), it
Jonathan M Davis:
It's the past participle of the Italian word dire (to say)
It was, a long time ago. Today it's detto.
Bye,
bearophile
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 01:22:33 +0400, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
More of an English question...
dunno - don't know
ditto - ?
Ditto is used to indicate that something already said is applicable a
second time.
In documentation, ditto means that previous comment also applies here.
Here
On Friday, October 08, 2010 15:17:13 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
It's the past participle of the Italian word dire (to say)
It was, a long time ago. Today it's detto.
Bye,
bearophile
Good to know. I was just going by what Merriam Webster had to say on that one.
I
know French
This is a simple D2 class that uses Contracts:
import std.c.stdio: printf;
class Car {
int speed = 0;
invariant() {
printf(Car invariant: %d\n, speed);
assert(speed = 0);
}
this() {
printf(Car constructor: %d\n, speed);
speed = 0;
}
On Friday 08 October 2010 20:16:10 bearophile wrote:
This is a simple D2 class that uses Contracts:
import std.c.stdio: printf;
class Car {
int speed = 0;
invariant() {
printf(Car invariant: %d\n, speed);
assert(speed = 0);
}
this() {
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5016
Summary: to!() can not convert from wide characters to char
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3613
Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4634
Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5017
Summary: Access Violation when calling a template function of
outer class (from inner one)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5018
Summary: segfault / stack overflow when calling overriden
Stream.writeBlock
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
Hi,
when I compile the current state of my project, I get the following
assertion failure: '!vthis-csym' on line 698 in file 'glue.c'
I tried to reproduce this in a smaller scale, but it only appears in
this very special case. The project currently contains 72 source files
and it only
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5019
Summary: In std.regex, empty capture at end of string causes
error
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5020
Summary: Forward implicit bool conversions to alias this
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
