On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:29 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[ . . . ]
Just for fun, try:
dmd -man
!!
That presupposes you are connected to the Internet. Much of the time I
am not. I appreciate this is an almost heretical position to be in but
mobile Internet hasn't actually arrived
V Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:23:32 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
This case is missed. The result must be always in range of ubyte.
ubyte ub;
ubyte a = 255 - ub; // Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
// (255 -
Walter Bright Wrote:
To do 64 bits on Windows requires:
1. 64 bit OMF
2. 64 bit librarian
3. 64 bit generating dmd
4. 64 bit C compiler
5. 64 bit symbolic debug info
6. 64 bit debugger
7. 64 bit C runtime
Just one of those won't do it. All are necessary. The reason I did 64 bit
Couldn't find it at the website. What's the advantage of going the other way
(compared to C's defaulting to globals and the __thread keyword which is also
used by some D1 guys in a modified dmd)?
Might be good to put it into something like
Guess I found it (by accident)
http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/228700137
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:00:52 -0500, phobophile wrote:
A legitimate question - where are the D3 plans? Any language not in
active development (no don't mean phobos, not toolchain) is dead. D2 has
little potential without AST macros. I want to participate in D3
development. Maybe bearophile
Am 22.02.2011 05:54, schrieb %u:
That's pretty good. Almost all of those things are standard C.
LDIV and UDIV could easily be eliminated.
__except_list is a null asm label (it is FS:[0]).
So the main problematic ones are:
_xi_a , __acrtused_con, the __fp functions, and _Ccmp
So how to
dennis luehring Wrote:
i don't if the source of snn.lib is available - is it?
Don't think so, that's dmc land.
On 2011-02-23 03:28, bearophile wrote:
This is a Scala implementation of a function that prints the carpet:
def nextCarpet(carpet: List[String]): List[String] = (
carpet.map(x = x + x + x) :::
carpet.map(x = x + x.replace('#', ' ') + x) :::
carpet.map(x = x + x + x))
def
Am 21.02.2011 15:26, schrieb Don:
Trass3r wrote:
In 2.052 several of the most complicated dependencies on snn.lib (those
relating to exception handling) were removed. I don't know how many more
DMC-specific ones there are, but using another snn.lib might be possible
now.
Compiled a hello
I try to read the language reference on
http://d-programming-language.org/lex.html but no menu opens on clicking the
language reference item, and only one article about lexical conventions is
available. There used to be more information there so probably the recent
changes (addition of the
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 03:24:56 Morlan wrote:
I try to read the language reference on
http://d-programming-language.org/lex.html but no menu opens on clicking
the language reference item, and only one article about lexical
conventions is available. There used to be more information
On 23/02/2011 01:22, %u wrote:
- private makes no sense since (unless we're trying to imitate C++ here)
destructors are only called from
the runtime, and nowhere else.
- The only meaningful attribute there is extern(C).
In what way is extern(C) meaningful for a destructor?
I guess it
Am 22.02.2011 05:54, schrieb %u:
That's pretty good. Almost all of those things are standard C.
LDIV and UDIV could easily be eliminated.
__except_list is a null asm label (it is FS:[0]).
So the main problematic ones are:
_xi_a , __acrtused_con, the __fp functions, and _Ccmp
So how to
dennis luehring Wrote:
question out of curiosity - would it be a good idea
(or technical solveable) to replace the snn.lib complete with D code?
Doesn't make sense since you'd have to introduce the D runtime into C runtime
code (remember that dmc also uses that runtime for compiling C code)
I tried LDC2 for Linux out last week and again last night.
I was even more self-torturing, I tried to compile it on Windoze twice I think.
But it didn't really work.
Also I got the feeling that LDC2 has been hastily updated to the newest dmd
frontend without verifying each upgrade step by step
On Tuesday 22 February 2011 05:01:24 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/21/11 8:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Okay, removing elements from a container sucks right now. You can do
stuff like removeAny (generally pretty useless IMHO) or removeFront just
fine, but removing an arbitrary range
How come is our loss?
I keep an eye on D and Go, because personally, I would like to see a
language replace C and C++
as THE systems programming language.
But I hardly use any of them beside some toy examples, because on my part of
the world,
be it with C++ or VM languages I am spoiled for
Jacob Carlborg:
def sierpinskiCarpets(n: Int) = (Iterator.iterate(List(#))(nextCarpet)
drop n next) foreach println
Again Scala shines with its beautiful lambdas compared to Ds ugly string
version.
In software engineering there aren't many free things. For some of the Scala
features
Am 23.02.2011 12:56, schrieb Trass3r:
dennis luehring Wrote:
question out of curiosity - would it be a good idea
(or technical solveable) to replace the snn.lib complete with D code?
Doesn't make sense since you'd have to introduce the D runtime into C runtime
code (remember that dmc also
On 22.02.2011 7:54, %u wrote:
That's pretty good. Almost all of those things are standard C.
LDIV and UDIV could easily be eliminated.
__except_list is a null asm label (it is FS:[0]).
So the main problematic ones are:
_xi_a , __acrtused_con, the __fp functions, and _Ccmp
So how to tackle
Michal Minich wrote:
V Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:23:32 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
This case is missed. The result must be always in range of ubyte.
ubyte ub;
ubyte a = 255 - ub; // Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
On 2/23/11 5:24 AM, Morlan wrote:
I try to read the language reference on
http://d-programming-language.org/lex.html but no menu opens on clicking the
language reference item, and only one article about lexical conventions is
available. There used to be more information there so probably the
On 2/23/11 5:10 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-23 03:28, bearophile wrote:
This is a Scala implementation of a function that prints the carpet:
def nextCarpet(carpet: List[String]): List[String] = (
carpet.map(x = x + x + x) :::
carpet.map(x = x + x.replace('#', ' ') + x) :::
On 2/22/11 3:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:48:42 -0500, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
D pure functions are significantly different than this definition
(as of recent times, when weak-pure was added).
Essentially, a pure function cannot access global variables.
On 2/22/11 8:28 PM, bearophile wrote:
import std.stdio, std.string, std.algorithm, std.array, std.range;
string[] nextCarpet(string[] c) {
auto b = array(map!q{a ~ a ~ a}(c));
return b ~ array(map!q{a ~ a.replace(#, ) ~ a}(c)) ~ b;
}
void main() {
auto c = recurrence!((a, n){
Andrei:
popFrontN(c, 3);
... use c.front() ...
Right. I have used the c.popFrontN(3); syntax and then I have not read the
error message well.
A drop(range, n) is an expression, it allows to write it as this:
drop(c, 3).front
You shouldn't need array most at all. Use chain() instead of ~.
dennis luehring wrote:
i don't if the source of snn.lib is available - is it?
The complete source to DMC and it's libraries are available
in the purchased development kit.
On 2/22/11 8:41 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:23:00 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/22/11 7:58 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
A cursor in dcollections is actually a zero or one element range. It can
only reference exactly one
Paulo Pinto wrote:
How come is our loss?
VMs come with a cost for what's really very little gain. You
don't need a fancy VM to have a nice language.
It does not matter how good something is, in regards with what is
actually being used, if the pain to switch is too big for the
beneficts that
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:33:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/22/11 8:41 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:23:00 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
This may as well be The Great Unification that was
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 01:30:49 -0500, Philippe Sigaud
philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 23:20, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
s/insert/put
Now all containers that support insertion are output ranges...
Or am I missing something?
I mean that, in the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:01:12 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
I've made several improvements to RedBlackTree and created a pull
request for
them: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/10
I'll be sure to look at this soon. I really need to ramp up my git
Dmitry Olshansky Wrote:
that's where I stopped, technically it might still be attainable.
What I gather is that windows DMD itself emits direct references on
__LDIV, __alloca and friends found in snn.
Maybe we can get out by writing simple thunk lib to replace snn.lib that
maps these to MS
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:04:49 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/22/11 3:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:48:42 -0500, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
D pure functions are significantly different than this definition
(as of recent
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:19:15 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
I would think malloc and friends should be pure, as well as free. They
can easily simply be marked pure, since they are C bindings.
D even accepts strongly pure functions like:
pure
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/21/11 6:08 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
This is a long-standing myth. I worked on Wall Street and have friends
who have been doing it for years. Everybody uses double.
Unbrutal Python programmers are encouraged to
On 2011-02-23 13:13, bearophile wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
def sierpinskiCarpets(n: Int) = (Iterator.iterate(List(#))(nextCarpet) drop n
next) foreach println
Again Scala shines with its beautiful lambdas compared to Ds ugly string
version.
In software engineering there aren't many free
On 2011-02-23 13:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/23/11 5:10 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-23 03:28, bearophile wrote:
This is a Scala implementation of a function that prints the carpet:
def nextCarpet(carpet: List[String]): List[String] = (
carpet.map(x = x + x + x) :::
On 2/23/11 9:00 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:04:49 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/22/11 3:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:48:42 -0500, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
D pure functions are significantly
On 2/23/11 9:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-23 13:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/23/11 5:10 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-23 03:28, bearophile wrote:
This is a Scala implementation of a function that prints the carpet:
def nextCarpet(carpet: List[String]): List[String]
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:35:26 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 9:00 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:04:49 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/22/11 3:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue,
On 2/23/11 9:42 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:35:26 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
free(p) affects data remotely outside the pure function.
This is allowed however in the new pure regime:
pure void foo(int *x) {(*x)++;}
int x;
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:46:43 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
At a level it's clear to me that a function cannot be at the same time
pure and unsafe. For example:
pure void foo(int *x) { free(x); (*x)++; }
This function essentially breaks any guarantee for
On 2/23/11, dennis luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
but the new ida freeware version 5
I did not know v5 went freeware. Fantastic, thanks.
I thought @safe was orthogonal to pure? If this isn't the case,
then yes, free must be disallowed. But then malloc must also be,
and any construct which manages its own memory via malloc/free.
From what I remember, pure functions:
1. cannot access shared or global non-immutable data
2.
Jesse,
Thanks for clarifying some of those. Something like that, but with more detail,
should go right on the front page.
That's a shame about std.xml being lost completely. I thought maybe someone was
working on it and might have an updated version. std.json would probably work
okay for
On 10/02/2011 00:23, bearophile wrote:
But in Rust there are typestates, so while a variable can't change type, its
type sometimes changes state along the flow of the code, such state of the type
may be different in different parts of the code
Hum, this typestate concept actually looks
On 10/02/2011 09:36, Don wrote:
so wrote:
(1) If it is a const member function, then it will have a viral
effect on all objects -- any function called by opEquals will have to
be marked const.
It doesn't look like we can solve this by switching the constness of
an Object.function,
unless we
On 13/02/2011 23:28, retard wrote:
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:06:46 -0800, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 2/13/2011 3:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
On 14/02/2011 12:37, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-13 16:07, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Paulo Pinto Wrote:
Nick Sabalauskya@a.a wrote in message
news:ij7v76$1q4t$1...@digitalmars.com...
... (cutted) ...
That's not the compiler, that's the linker. I don't know what linker
DMD
uses on OSX, but
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:41:52 -0500, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
I thought @safe was orthogonal to pure? If this isn't the case,
then yes, free must be disallowed. But then malloc must also be,
and any construct which manages its own memory via malloc/free.
From what I remember, pure
On 2/23/11 9:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:46:43 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
At a level it's clear to me that a function cannot be at the same time
pure and unsafe. For example:
pure void foo(int *x) { free(x); (*x)++; }
This
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:45:48 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 9:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:46:43 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
At a level it's clear to me that a function cannot be at
On 2/23/11 10:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:45:48 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 9:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:46:43 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
At a
It seems that you're using the word pure as a synonym for the noalias
and/or restrict __declspec keywords. However, they're different words
because they have
different meanings. :) If you really mean noalias, then I think we just just
call it that and introduce the attribute @noalias?
On 2011-02-23 11:45:48 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
On 2/23/11 9:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:46:43 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
At a level it's clear to me that a function cannot be at the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:01:15 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 10:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Why? We have both attributes, why not just require @safe pure if you
want @safe pure functions?
Because a pure unsafe function is useless.
Just
On 2/23/11 8:51 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:33:03 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/22/11 8:41 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:23:00 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
This may
Programmers are allowed to make conceptually safe functions which
are not marked as @safe, why not the same for pure functions?
Programmers can always shoot themselves in the foot anyway, if they
really want to. Why not just make it easier for them? :) (We could
allow unsafe casts, for
On 2/23/11 11:16 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:01:15 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 10:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Why? We have both attributes, why not just require @safe pure if you
want @safe pure functions?
On 2/23/2011 12:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/22/11 1:04 PM, Nick wrote:
Coming from Andrei's work in C++ Modern C++ Programming I wonder how
to implement many of those patterns in D?
In C++ I would work with type lists and use lots of multiple inheritance
and templates to get the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:16:26 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 8:51 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't think this is possible. When passing a range to a container for
removal, the container needs to access the underlying implementation
(e.g.
Am 23.02.2011 17:47, schrieb Nicholas:
Jesse,
Thanks for clarifying some of those. Something like that, but with more detail,
should go right on the front page.
That's a shame about std.xml being lost completely. I thought maybe someone was
working on it and might have an updated version.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:28:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 11:16 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Just because a function is not marked @safe does not mean it is unsafe.
It just means you can do things the compiler cannot verify are safe, but
Bruno Medeiros:
The good news is that I suspect the fields used for
opEquals/opCmp/opHash in any class are unlikely to be fields that are
computed lazily. It's just a guess though, anyone have examples otherwise?
If I have a string type, I'd like to compute its hash value lazily, the first
On 2/23/11 11:47 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:28:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 11:16 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Just because a function is not marked @safe does not mean it is unsafe.
It just means you can do
Nicholas Wrote:
This, of course, in addition to the old Tango/Phobos situation. A lot of
great energy thinly spread across the D domain.
Yep, at least there's 1 or 2 attempts to port Tango to D2 or rather get it to
compile with dmd2.
Hopefully these don't peter out.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:25:52 -0500, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
Programmers are allowed to make conceptually safe functions which
are not marked as @safe, why not the same for pure functions?
Programmers can always shoot themselves in the foot anyway, if they
really want to. Why not just
On 2011-02-23 12:01:15 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Because a pure unsafe function is useless.
I disagree. Suppose you have a function which is conceptually pure but
requires a temporary 100 Mb matrix of doubles. Wouldn't it make sense
to use malloc/free
I've had an idea lately on that note. I'd think it would be cool if
rdmd (not standard dmd) had support for this style of import magic:
// @grab url:http://someserver.com/somelib/v1.0/src/somelib/somemodule.d
size:4321 sha1:2fd4e1c67a2d28fced849ee1bb76e7391b93eb12
import somelib.somemodule;
The
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
Now on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/fr6ba/value_range_propagation_or_how_to_fit_those_two/
--
Simen
On 2/22/11 10:36 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
%u Wrote:
Well, the trouble is, pretty much all of these are invalid attributes:
- static obviously makes no sense
And here is where you're wrong. You have defined a static destructor, which is
called with module destructor as the program goes
Steven Schveighoffer:
cast voids all warranties ;)
OK. But that idea is unchanged if you remove the cast and return an int* from
that function.
Memory allocation has to be allowed inside pure functions. Otherwise,
pure functions are too strict and limited.
I agree. But there are
On 23/02/2011 17:22, Nick wrote:
On 2/23/2011 12:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei
Thanks for all your replies!
I was not sure about mixins: the template ones had a little warning in
the book as being mostly experimental, and the string mixins, while
powerful, seemed to me something
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:13:35 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
cast voids all warranties ;)
OK. But that idea is unchanged if you remove the cast and return an int*
from that function.
That is allowed, and it's expected that a pure function can
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 06:56:45 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:01:12 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
I've made several improvements to RedBlackTree and created a pull
request for
them:
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 09:17:15 %u wrote:
It seems that you're using the word pure as a synonym for the noalias
and/or restrict __declspec keywords. However, they're different words
because they have
different meanings. :) If you really mean noalias, then I think we just
just
Because a pure unsafe function is useless.
I disagree. Suppose you have a function which is conceptually pure but
requires a temporary 100
Mb matrix of doubles. Wouldn't it make sense to use malloc/free for this
temporary storage
instead of using the GC and risking the block never being
Steven Schveighoffer:
That is allowed, and it's expected that a pure function can return
different references with identical calls.
A pointer and a transparent reference are two different things. That function
returns a pointer, and a pointer is a value.
If you call a pure function with the
On 2/23/11 12:03 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
Now on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/fr6ba/value_range_propagation_or_how_to_fit_those_two/
The article never made it
No. pure is what we want. Changing it would break code and contradict TDPL
(though the
addition of weakly pure isn't in TDPL). Strongly pure functions are essentially
what you'd
expect from pure. Weakly pure functions aren't, but they're necessary to make
pure very
useful, and there's no real
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:28:01 -0500, %u wfunct...@hotmail.com wrote:
No. pure is what we want. Changing it would break code and contradict
TDPL (though the
addition of weakly pure isn't in TDPL). Strongly pure functions are
essentially what you'd
expect from pure. Weakly pure functions
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:31:35 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
That is allowed, and it's expected that a pure function can return
different references with identical calls.
A pointer and a transparent reference are two different things. That
Walter Bright wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
The max value for an unsigned char is 255, not 256. Other than
that, a pretty interesting article, thanks.
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 08:47:31 Nicholas wrote:
Jesse,
Thanks for clarifying some of those. Something like that, but with more
detail, should go right on the front page.
That's a shame about std.xml being lost completely. I thought maybe
someone was working on it and might
On 23/02/2011 18:07, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/22/11 10:36 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
%u Wrote:
Well, the trouble is, pretty much all of these are invalid attributes:
- static obviously makes no sense
And here is where you're wrong. You have defined a static destructor, which is
called
with
LDC2 Status
LDC2 passes almost all phobos unittests and tests from dmd suite on linux x86.
Also it probably works on freebsd, but it's broken on other platforms and
architectures.
I currently work on linux X86_64 port: ldc2 already compiles druntime and
phobos, although there are some serious
On 23/02/11 07:22, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:23:32 +0200, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ctod.html#types , which is linked from
the article, still mentions the
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:28:01 %u wrote:
No. pure is what we want. Changing it would break code and contradict
TDPL (though the
addition of weakly pure isn't in TDPL). Strongly pure functions are
essentially what you'd expect from pure. Weakly pure functions aren't, but
they're
Steven Schveighoffer:
A pointer is not a value, it's a pointer. int is a value. You should
expect two calls to a pure function to return the same exact int.
I don't care of how you want to define what a pointer is. Definitions are
labels for ideas, you are free to use a different label.
Trass3r Wrote:
Also I got the feeling that LDC2 has been hastily updated to the newest
dmd frontend without verifying each upgrade step by step and now things
are subtly broken.
When I started to work on ldc2, it was in terrible state (it did not
even compile). So, yes, I decided to update
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:32 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
I see zero value in disallowing comparing pointers in D.
I have not suggested to disallow comparing all pointers. I have
suggested to disallow it only for pointers/references allocated
On 2/23/11, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
== Quote from Andrej Mitrovic (andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com)'s article
I've been trying to compile GDC the last couple of days. I've ran into
some issues, but I've put them in GDC tickets and it seems from the
last comments that Iain Buclaw has
On 22/02/11 23:52, dsimcha wrote:
I tried LDC2 for Linux out last week and again last night. I didn't
spend much time on it on either attempt, but so far I haven't been able
to get even Hello, World to compile. It seems like the instructions for
building druntime, etc. are horribly outdated, the
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/23/11 12:03 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://ddj.com/blog/archives/2011/02/value_range_pro.html
Now on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/fr6ba/value_range_propagation_or_how_to_fit_those_two/
Well now I've tried executing it from the build folder but then I get an error:
andrej@andrej-VirtualBox:~/Desktop/gdcbuild/buildgw/buildgw/gcc$ ./gdc test.d
gdc: error trying to exec 'cc1d': execvp: No such file or directory
(disregard the double buildgw folder, I've accidentally made two).
On 23/02/11 21:15, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
which apparently installed it in /build/Mingw32, but I can't seem to invoke it:
$ gdc
The program 'gdc' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:
sudo apt-get install gdc
What do I have to do to be able to run gdc from within any
On 23/02/11 21:15, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 22/02/11 23:52, dsimcha wrote:
I tried LDC2 for Linux out last week and again last night. I didn't
spend much time on it on either attempt, but so far I haven't been able
to get even Hello, World to compile. It seems like the instructions for
Ooh I'm probably missing runtime libs like binutils. Sorry!
I still want to know how to install gdc on the system though.
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
