Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-12-07 Thread dolive
Daniel Murphy Wrote: Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message news:j4gflo$1c59$1...@digitalmars.com... I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach. I suspect a big part of the reason it's stagnated is because it's difficult to update to new versions of DMD.

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-12 Thread Don
On 11.09.2011 17:07, Daniel Murphy wrote: Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message news:j4i33b$1bc2$1...@digitalmars.com... I find this strange: D can call C++ free functions and virtual member functions but it cannot call non-virtual or static member functions. Especially not be able to

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-12 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-09-12 03:35, Daniel Murphy wrote: Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message news:j4j4al$il3$1...@digitalmars.com... Virtual functions needs to be mangled as well. The only thing that, at least I know about, differs from a free function and a static member function is the mangling. --

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-11 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-09-11 06:08, Daniel Murphy wrote: Nick Sabalauskya@a.a wrote in message news:j4gflo$1c59$1...@digitalmars.com... I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach. I suspect a big part of the reason it's stagnated is because it's difficult to update to new

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-11 Thread Daniel Murphy
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message news:j4i33b$1bc2$1...@digitalmars.com... I find this strange: D can call C++ free functions and virtual member functions but it cannot call non-virtual or static member functions. Especially not be able to call static member functions are

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-11 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-09-11 17:07, Daniel Murphy wrote: Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message news:j4i33b$1bc2$1...@digitalmars.com... I find this strange: D can call C++ free functions and virtual member functions but it cannot call non-virtual or static member functions. Especially not be able to

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-11 Thread Daniel Murphy
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message news:j4j4al$il3$1...@digitalmars.com... Virtual functions needs to be mangled as well. The only thing that, at least I know about, differs from a free function and a static member function is the mangling. -- /Jacob Carlborg Virtual functions

Re: Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

2011-09-10 Thread Nick Sabalausky
dolive doliv...@sina.com wrote in message news:j4f55s$1r9p$1...@digitalmars.com... Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd. Yea, that would be really nice. I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach. I suspect a big part of the reason it's stagnated is because