On Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 09:41:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2020 12:01 AM, Manu wrote:
Quick quick, we need a PR to issue deprecation messages for
those
invalid read/writes! :)
It's already been merged!
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/10209
Some really fast work there :-)
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:15 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> On 1/3/2020 3:41 AM, Manu wrote:
> > We've already had this -preview for quite a while; I have enabled it
> > in an experimental context, but I don't tend to write and deploy code
> > that depends on
On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 17:40:47 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I haven't tried, but:
https://github.com/linkedin/dexmaker
Yes, indeed, that is a possibility. I might work on this...
honestly probably after several months given the length of my to
do list right now.
On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 14:37:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 5 January 2020 at 03:56:37 UTC, visitor wrote:
Not a single line of java!
so i got kinda excited for creating a class 100% in D as well,
but.
https://developer.android.com/training/articles/perf-jni.html
On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 17:18:46 UTC, visitor wrote:
hum ... indeed most of the native samples in android are using
java helper classes
Yeah, the NativeActivity is I think the only one that doesn't
(and that's just because Google provides a pre-built helper java
class).
But I'm
On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 14:37:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
gah, there goes that idea. So I guess that means the lambda
callbacks for ui classes must be implemented in Java too. alas.
but still most things work anyway so still fun.
hum ... indeed most of the native samples in android
On Sunday, 5 January 2020 at 03:56:37 UTC, visitor wrote:
Not a single line of java!
so i got kinda excited for creating a class 100% in D as well,
but.
https://developer.android.com/training/articles/perf-jni.html
"DefineClass is not implemented. Android does not use Java
bytecodes
Am 06.01.2020 um 00:23 schrieb Oleg B:
It's analog of bindbc, but without need write boilerplate code.
May be bindbc is designed for another cases, but I don't understand need
writing triple definition for one function (pointer, loading,
wrap-function).
ssll betterC compatible too, and tested
On Sunday, 5 January 2020 at 23:23:48 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
It's analog of bindbc, but without need write boilerplate code.
May be bindbc is designed for another cases, but I don't
understand need writing triple definition for one function
(pointer, loading, wrap-function).
ssll betterC
