On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 17:54:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
XML is evil.
Agreed!
I'm going with TOML, community package. It's working, so far.
Greetings,
for an array byte[3][3] myArr, I can code myArr[0] = 5 and have:
5,5,5
0,0,0
0,0,0
Can I perform a similar assignment to the column? This,
myArr[][0] = 5, doesn't work.
Thanks!
Why do you want a type?
I want a type because it gives clear context as to what family
the method(s) belongs to, and helps make the code more idiomatic
and easy to understand.
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 21:50:03 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
Use a struct and put `static:` after the opening brace. That's
what GC is in core.memory.
Using a `struct` for a purely static type would still allow the
user to create instances of that `struct`. To bypass that,
you'd have
Use a struct and put `static:` after the opening brace. That's
what GC is in core.memory.
Using a `struct` for a purely static type would still allow the
user to create instances of that `struct`. To bypass that, you'd
have to disable the default constructor -- that then becomes
ugly,
On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 11:28:23 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
```
final abstract class Algo {
void drawLine(Canvas c, Pos from, Pos to) { .. };
}
```
This solution seems like a bit of a hack, which is why I don't
like it.
Interesting solution if you put `static:` in there.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 03:59:52PM +, Adam D Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 15:37:56 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
> > Why not XML? :) It has comments, you can use backslashes too.
>
> no kidding, xml is an underrated format.
XML is evil.
Let me qualify
On 1/29/23 22:09, RTM wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide wrote:
>
>> That is, you can do OOP without classes
>
> How so?
OOP is about putting objects (data) and behavior (functions) together.
> Every OOP definition includes classes
OOP is possible in C, which
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 15:37:56 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
Why not XML? :) It has comments, you can use backslashes too.
no kidding, xml is an underrated format.
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:38:46 UTC, Daren Scot Wilson
wrote:
I just realized - it's been ages since I've dealt with config
files, beyond editing them as an end user. I work on existing
software where someone else made the choiced and wrote the
code, or it's a small specialized project
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:38:46 UTC, Daren Scot Wilson
wrote:
So, which package do I use for TOML?
I find these three:
* toml-foolery (Andrej Petrović)
* toml-d, or toml.d (oglu on github) at ver 0.3.0
* toml, (dlang community on github) at ver 2.0.1
I'm guessing from version numbers
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 08:20:21 UTC, ProtectAndHide wrote:
But there is always 'an ugly way' to do it too:
http://www.cs.rit.edu/~ats/books/ooc.pdf
Yep, but it’s not OOP per se, just a form of lowering. First CPP
implementation was a cross-compiled one.
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:09:56 UTC, RTM wrote:
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
That is, you can do OOP without classes
How so? Every OOP definition includes classes (encapsulation +
inheritance).
I didn't say you should do it, just that you can
13 matches
Mail list logo
