On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 18:43:37 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 18:41:49 UTC, DLearner wrote:
A* A_Ptr;
struct B {
int BFld2;
typeof(A_Ptr)[0..($-1)] ASUB; // Idea is ASUB of type A,
from A_Ptr of type A*.
I think what you really want is
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 18:41:49 UTC, DLearner wrote:
A* A_Ptr;
struct B {
int BFld2;
typeof(A_Ptr)[0..($-1)] ASUB; // Idea is ASUB of type A,
from A_Ptr of type A*.
I think what you really want is
typeof(*A_Ptr) ASUB;
the typeof thing returns the type you'd get from the
Trying to manipulate 'typeof' return strings, preferably at
compile-time.
e.g. to produce struct B below (intended to have an A
sub-struct), from A_Ptr alone.
```
struct A {
int AFld1;
}
A* A_Ptr;
struct B {
int BFld2;
typeof(A_Ptr)[0..($-1)] ASUB; // Idea is ASUB of type A, from
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 15:46:18 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 19:17:20 UTC, Antonio wrote:
Basically, the ternary conditional ```?:``` result type is not
inferred even if the type returned by the two possibilities
are the same.
**Is it a bug or the
On Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 19:17:20 UTC, Antonio wrote:
Basically, the ternary conditional ```?:``` result type is not
inferred even if the type returned by the two possibilities are
the same.
**Is it a bug or the expected behaviour?**
Known bug, first reported in 2009:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 14:10:30 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 11:01:14 UTC, Antonio wrote:
```d
I aOrB(bool check){
if(check)
return new A();
else
return new B();
}
```
**Is it the expected behaviour for ternary conditional?**
Here the compiler
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 11:01:14 UTC, Antonio wrote:
```d
I aOrB(bool check){
if(check)
return new A();
else
return new B();
}
```
**Is it the expected behaviour for ternary conditional?**
Here the compiler knows what type to return (from the function
signature).
But the
On Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 19:17:20 UTC, Antonio wrote:
```d
interface I {
bool check();
}
class A : I {
bool check() =>true;
}
class B : I {
bool check() =>false;
}
I aOrB(bool check) => check ? new A() : new B();
void main()
{
assert( aOrB(true).check );
}
```
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 08:51:21 UTC, Mark Davies wrote:
I did it this way ...
You always print the full array of bytes this way. Output piped
to `od -c` is
```
000 1 2 3 4 5 377 377 377 377 377 \n - 1 2
3 4
020 5 377 377 377 377 \n
```
Those 377s
On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 08:51:21 UTC, Mark Davies wrote:
On Friday, 24 November 2023 at 09:35:00 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
```
import std.stdio;
char[10] longToString(long n) @nogc
```
For a 'long' 10 characters is likely to be not enough (long max
is 9223372036854775808 which has 19 chars,
On Friday, 24 November 2023 at 09:35:00 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
I tried to look into https://dlang.org/phobos/std_conv.html
Most of the functions inside `std.conv` seem to be dependant on
[Garbage Collection](https://dlang.org/spec/garbage.html).
And I couldn't find a straightforward way to
11 matches
Mail list logo
