Re: DMD windows and Clang's llvm-link.exe

2024-03-09 Thread Carl Sturtivant via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Sunday, 10 March 2024 at 04:22:20 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote: On 10/03/2024 4:46 PM, Carl Sturtivant wrote: suggesting that there's a reason version 9 instead of 17 of lld is being used in the latest DMD installation, that may be relevant what I'd like to try. Any idea

Re: DMD windows and Clang's llvm-link.exe

2024-03-09 Thread Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 10/03/2024 4:46 PM, Carl Sturtivant wrote: suggesting that there's a reason version 9 instead of 17 of lld is being used in the latest DMD installation, that may be relevant what I'd like to try. Any idea what that might be? Yes, nobody has updated it.

Re: DMD windows and Clang's llvm-link.exe

2024-03-09 Thread Carl Sturtivant via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Saturday, 9 March 2024 at 22:07:05 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote: lld is used and distributed with dmd and ldc. That is known to work. If you have MSVC, it'll prefer that however. Interesting, perhaps I should have known that, though I have not used DMD on Windows for many

Re: DMD windows and Clang's llvm-link.exe

2024-03-09 Thread Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 10/03/2024 11:02 AM, Carl Sturtivant wrote: I'd like to see if I can get dmd to work correctly with Clang rather than MS tools. Can anyone share any experience they've had with this or any understanding of the situation? lld is used and distributed with dmd and ldc. That is known to work.