On Wednesday, 3 April 2024 at 21:57:00 UTC, Liam McGillivray
wrote:
Alright. I suppose that some of the optimization decisions I
have made so far may have resulted in less readable code for
little performance benefit. Now I'm trying to worry less about
optimization. Everything has been very
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:57:00PM +, Liam McGillivray via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Friday, 29 March 2024 at 01:18:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Take a look at the docs for core.memory.GC. There *is* a method
> > GC.free that you can use to manually deallocate GC-allocated memory
> >
On Friday, 29 March 2024 at 01:18:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Take a look at the docs for core.memory.GC. There *is* a
method GC.free that you can use to manually deallocate
GC-allocated memory if you so wish. Keep in mind, though, that
manually managing memory in this way invites
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:49:19PM +, Liam McGillivray via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 March 2024 at 04:46:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > The whole point of a GC is that you leave everything up to it to
> > clean up. If you want to manage your own memory, don't use the GC.
>
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 at 04:46:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The whole point of a GC is that you leave everything up to it
to clean up. If you want to manage your own memory, don't use
the GC. D does not force you to use it; you can import
core.stdc.stdlib and use malloc/free to your heart's
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:56:10AM +, Liam McGillivray via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> I may be now starting to see why the use of a garbage collector is
> such a point of contention for D. Not being able to predict how the
> garbage collection process will happen seems like a major
On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 at 22:14:16 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What's the definition of this.map, this.faction, and
this.currentTile?
As was said, and can be found on the linked repository, they are
references to class objects.
On Thursday, 28 March 2024 at 01:47:27 UTC, Steven
On Wednesday, 27 March 2024 at 21:43:48 UTC, Liam McGillivray
wrote:
In my current [game
project](https://github.com/LiamM32/Open_Emblem), [something
strange](https://github.com/LiamM32/Open_Emblem/issues/20) has
happened as of a recent commit. When running `dub test`, all
the unittests
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 09:43:48PM +, Liam McGillivray via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> ```
> ~this() {
> this.alive = false;
> if (this.map !is null) this.map.removeUnit(this);
> if (this.faction !is null) this.faction.removeUnit(this);
> if
In my current [game
project](https://github.com/LiamM32/Open_Emblem), [something
strange](https://github.com/LiamM32/Open_Emblem/issues/20) has
happened as of a recent commit. When running `dub test`, all the
unittests appear to pass, but then after the last unittest has
concluded an "Invalid
10 matches
Mail list logo
