Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Mode proposal Jamtor Iv

2006-01-25 Thread Paul L Schmidt
How about changing no place to only a limited place. For example, it's essential (*and currently legal*) for remote control of things like satellites. And it would be nice for emergency comms -- with the health privacy laws the way they are now, permission to pass encrypted text between approved

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies

2006-01-25 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies I heard the same sort of comment when SSB was new. The SSB equipment cost so much that only rich hams can afford it. Now everyone has it. My only problem with P3 or any new mode is that as hams we should try to exploit COTS hardware. For

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies

2006-01-25 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies Have you ever heard of the Rag Chewer's Award? Given to individuals who have a continuous 24 hour QSO? Walt/K5YFW -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Tim Gorman

[digitalradio] Winlink commercial value

2006-01-25 Thread KV9U
Even though it has been said before, based on the comment below, it needs to be said again ... Winlink and Winlink 2000 and any other similar systems used on amateur radio ... do NOT have commecial value to those running such systems. When anyone makes such claims, they lose much of their

[digitalradio] Semi-auto versus auto control of stations

2006-01-25 Thread jgorman01
Dave, I will pick on your message, but what really triggered my comment is my perception of the misunderstanding between semi-automtic operation and control. Too many comments here seem to display an acceptance of a relationship between these terms. Semi-automatic operation may a good term to

Re: [digitalradio] Re: encryption

2006-01-25 Thread Paul L Schmidt
kd4e wrote: 2. during a declared emergency And then only for specific purposes as requested by a Homeland Security approved agency and properly documented. One does not want to open the floodgates every time there is a declared emergency somewhere. We have to remember that those who

[digitalradio] unknown garbage trashes QSO

2006-01-25 Thread Danny Douglas
I just lost a QSO with 6O0N due to some trash coming up on 7.0637 thru 7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk is? Perfect example of SSB and Digital modes on same freq, not compatable. Danny Douglas N7DCex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USASV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB Need a Digital mode

Re: [digitalradio] unknown garbage trashes QSO

2006-01-25 Thread John Becker
right now there is CW and Pactor. Are you on LSB or USB? That would help. At 06:21 PM 1/25/06, you wrote: I just lost a QSO with 6O0N due to some trash coming up on 7.0637 thru 7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk is? Perfect example of SSB and Digital modes on same freq, not

Re: [digitalradio] unknown garbage trashes QSO

2006-01-25 Thread Danny Douglas
I was on voice, split operation. 6O was transmitting that freq when this buzz buzz came up. Probably Pactor, as I dont work it, and can only assume it was of that type. He certainly didnt listen, nor ask using any other mode, if the freq was in use. - Original Message - From: John

[digitalradio] Moderator action

2006-01-25 Thread obrienaj
A cooling off period appears to be needed. Many, many, good posts in the last few days, much appreciated. However some tempers appear frayed, so I have turned ON the moderation requirement for ALL messages by ALL members. This will be just a pause for a few hours to allow a period of