I've experienced some of this problem in the past too. I believe part
of the problem is that as you go up in freq, low angle radiation
(ground wave) is easier to achieve but the ground absorption increases
too. 15 meters seemed to be the best compromise. That is, 10m had
good low angle but high
Is there not a default offset?
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
222 mhz will work just fine try it.
Either 160 or 2 meters are the best bets.
Jim
WA0LYK
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to
John,
NVIS only works on the lower bands, and even 80 meters can go long in
the later evening after 8 or 9 pm local. You need to monitor the FoF2 to
get a feel for the highest frequency possible for NVIS operation. The
other night, one of the stations who has a high dipole of about 70
feet
On flat terrain, on 10M FM with 50 watts and a 1/4 wave groundplane at 30ft on
both ends for the link, you should be able to work each other at distances of
20-30 miles with no problem. I've done this quite regularlly on 29.6MHz-35Mhz
(commercial above 10M).
On 6M (52.525MHz), with the same
I think 1000hz is what most OLIVIA ops use, and
works fine with my 480SAT which can be set to center on either 1000 or 1500
hz.
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From:
John Becker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:19
AM
Subject:
Seems like a lot was being said on this topic recently.
The November issue of Communications of the Association
for Computing Machinery has an article on Hastily Formed
Networks that might be of interest to some of you.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other
I only recently joined this list so here is some
more specific information on 6-meter wideband digital testing.
TheARRL, at therequest ofthe HSMM WG,asked for and
was granted a license to test digital modes up to 200 kHz wideon 6
meters.Agoal of 256 kbps was set as this wouldallow decent
Even though the license authorized 50.3-50.8 MHz, I stayed away from the AM
calling frequency. The only frequency used so far is 50.7 MHz, so the signal
covers 50.625-50.775 MHz and the FCC occupied bandwidth (-27 dB) is within
50.6-50.8 MHz.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
Jim,
Good points! Thank you.
John - K8OCL
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: BPL-Busting Modes/Techniques
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:34:20 -
Actually, the statement that a solution is
All,
Somebody, not just Ed (HI), wrote to me off-list about this posting.
I reject my former positon as being simplistic and in error. Carry on ARRL!
73,
John - K8OCL
From: John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
11 matches
Mail list logo
