Your point was QRM is inevitable -- live with it.
My point is QRM from unattended stations is preventable; stop making
excuses and fix it.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
sticking tongue in cheek
jgorman01 wrote:
Rick,
From the ARRL's website:
Rather, we ask only that the Commission restore the privileges
unintentionally withdrawn from those who operate and who utilize
automatically controlled NARROWBAND digital stations between 3620 and
3635 kHz, the League said. The ARRL
I can't disagree with your comment. But, if you can't completely prevent it,
at least minimize it to the maximum extent possible.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 10:37
Your point was QRM is inevitable -- live with it.
My point is QRM from unattended stations is preventable; stop making
excuses and fix it.
david/wd4kpd
Dave,
Well, I was aware of SCAMP, but maybe not well informed about the results.
I have never seen it in action, as I was not one of the beta testers.
Nevertheless, it is a formidable task, and I know that Rick did work
hard on it.
But as SCAMP has not been in public distribution and not
I agree that the regulations of which emission types can appear where
and at what baud rates has outlived its usefulness and needs to go.
As to all the intricacies and arcana, and why the FCC has gotten so much
of it so very wrong, I think that many forum members may be missing the
larger
The asymmetric propagation case is impractical to address, whether
the stations involved are attended or unattended; fortunately, its
not common. The case we can address is that of the unattended station
that could, if suitably equipped, detect an already busy frequency
and thereby avoid
Yes, we asked for 200 kHz on 6M.
They proposed only 100 kHz. (HI)
Like Walt wrote, it's all relative.
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL
