Only from the League's lawyer, silly. That's as good as it gets.
Anyway, does anyone really want a response directly from the FCC, for Cat's
sake?!
Not I, dear sir. Especially after their recent Uni-Bus or whatever that
crash was (HI).
Here is the League's strategy: Ask them for
So, we are to gather from this that the FCC is saying to
everyone -- go out and do whatever you want and unless
someone complains we don't care?
That is contrary to the nature of bureaucracy and
bureaucrats.
Bureaucrats are focused on avoidance of conflict and
expansion of power.
Only so long
Maybe they should have tried this approach instead of petitioning the FCC.
73,
Mark N5RFX
At 09:24 AM 12/15/2006, you wrote:
Only from the League's lawyer, silly. That's as good as it gets.
Anyway, does anyone really want a response directly from the FCC, for Cat's
sake?!
Not I, dear sir.
Anyone else hear the LSB Digital Signal on 3832.51?
Carrier is S7 here in west central Florida.
ON LSB it ounds like a rushing wind.
--
Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E
... in sunny warm Florida :-)
~~~
Thank our brave soldiers this season:
Mark,
I think you might be correct!
TELL...I write again**TELL** the FCC what you want down to the last
detail.
If they don't respond in a reasonable period (90 days?), well, then ya got
it! (HI)
It's called management by exception, I think.
Although the League, to their credit, did
You would normally be correct.
However, again, the FCC does not give a %$# about Ham Radio!
That includes the ARRL and all the celebrities you can find.
Original Message Follows
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
John Champa wrote:
You would normally be correct.
However, again, the FCC does not give a %$# about Ham Radio!
That includes the ARRL and all the celebrities you can find.
Licensed HAM celebrities? Isn't that counter-intuitive?
Asserting that they don't care about their own hobby
makes no
John,
Your response is not one that I would have expected. Until my recent
retiremen, I worked for the better part of two decades, as an
environmental safety and health consultant. A substantial part of my
work involved contacting government bureaucrats at the state and federal
level to gain
Look at http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/reports.html to see what the FCC thinks.
Their
spectrum policy report states:
As a general proposition, flexibility in spectrum regulation is critical to
improving
access to spectrum. In this context, flexibility means granting both
licensed users
and
Hello Bill,
RR for all.
Am confused as in your MFSK16 help file it states IMPORTANT: the
picture format is not fixed as in classical SSTV but can be anything.
The maximum dimensions of the transmitted picture are 1600x1200.
Multipsk proposes to use the standard 320x256 to take advantage of
Continued failure to eliminate the preventable QRM from unattended
digital stations reinforces the position that amateurs cannot be
trusted with the maximum possible autonomy to determine the highest
valued use of their spectrum.
Actual evidence that the operators of such stations will
Anyone on olivia t0night? Just wanted to do some psk / olivia trials.
Nor do Germans understand having a speed limit. That doesnt mean they are
correct. Excess speed, proven by scientists, KILLS. Having rules sets a limit
on individuals who would never set a limit on themselves, at the expense of the
masses. Our ham populations exceeds that of most all
Hi - I just joined yesterday, and this is my first post. I am 70 years
old, and although I have a fairly good knowledge of electronics due to
having worked as a electronics tech and field engineer for many years, I
am somewhat computer illiterate, since it was BC (before computers LOL)
when I was
David,
Most of the new rules are understandable, just a few that were confusing
or not completely clear or, at least in one case, in conflict with other
rules.
The ARRL announced today that their late filed Petition for
Reconsideration has not been acted upon by the FCC, therefore the new
Try the digital modes with what you have. It may work
fine for your operations. I have used much slower
computers with built in sound cards and they seem to
do ok for casual use.
73 de KU4PT
--- Leslie Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - I just joined yesterday, and this is my first
Thanks for reminded us Rick. With all that has been written, I have forgotten
what is new. Would the following rough summary be close?
Some parts of the 40 and 80M phone privileges have been extended in to the
former CW or digital portions.?
CW operators have lost nothing, just have to
General Class ops have lost all privileges from 3600 to 3800.
Advanced Class ops have lost all privileges from 3700 to 3800.
Thus the reason for CW nets having to move below 3600.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew J. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
John B. Stephensen wrote:
and 8 kHz maximum bandwidth limit. However, ARRL memebers want more
stringent regulations.
Not all of them.
73,
Paul / K9PS
(Life Member of both ARRL and QCWA who doesn't.)
Welcome to the group. I use an el-cheapo Circuit City PC with an integrated
sound card. It works just fine for me on the digital modes. I think most
digital mode software would expect at least a 16 bit sound card.
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Elliott
To:
now would be a good time to get the arrl cw practice down in the
area that they themselves recommend for cw.
david/wd4kpd
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
now would be a good time to get the arrl cw practice down in the
area that they themselves recommend for cw.
david/wd4kpd
Effective today there is no more Morse Code
requirement so the ARRL should suspend CW
broadcasts immediately and release that spectrum
Ill bet the VE sessions are loaded with people for the next several months.
That is what incentive licensing is all about. And the reason many of us
upgraded in the 60s. Why dont all those nets go up above 3800? People keep
saying that CW is allowed up there.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Radioguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA
CONTACT:
December 15,
2006
Chelsea Fallon: (202) 418-7991
FCC MODIFIES AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE RULES,
ELIMINATING MORSE CODE EXAM REQUIREMENTS AND
Why bother? They just did away with CW
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesty I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Bert,
I think you have to compare the previous privileges to the current
privileges. Under the new rules General, Advanced and Extra hams lose
150 KHz for Data/RTTY from 3600 to 3750 and is a big impact although
most data/RTTY did not go much above say, 3650?
But it is a huge impact on the
LETS MAKE THE BEST OF THIS AND GO GET NEW GOOD HAMS !
--- kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
When does this take effect? Can no code hams
start tonight on HF or do
we have to wait for the rules to be published in
the Federal Register
plus 30 days ?
I am advised by
Here in VK interest in CW has been increasing one we no-coders got HF
privileges. The code practice beacons are an invaluable resource for those
learning. On-air code practice sessions take place and have increasing
number of participants, including those who did not require the code to get
on HF
Leslie,
Without question, the Technician license is going to have the same
privileges as the Tech +. The CW segment is not small. It is the same
segment that the General and Advanced Class operators have. The Extra
too, except they have 25 more KHz at the bottom. This means that all
classes
29 matches
Mail list logo
