Re: [digitalradio] Re: Bad PSK signals ?

2007-03-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Well drink some water from Thirlmere since it is actually a resovoir (or was, last I knew) and if you stop by Windermere, that's my home town. There are a couple of repeaters in that area linked to Echolink so you might be able to communicate from Thirlmere to Thirlmere. Andy K3UK On 3/11/07,

[digitalradio] Re: Busy detector

2007-03-11 Thread jgorman01
I don't know how hard it would be to pull this part of the software out and run it on its own AND to control a transmitter with it. Remember, the pmbo is probably seeing a CTS indication from the pactor modem. You would have to use another receiver and pc running scamp and somehow get the pmbo

[digitalradio] Re: Bad PSK signals ?

2007-03-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was watching a bad PSK31 signal on 40M this morning, an IMD of -6 and harmonic waterfall 'trails all over my 3 Khz wide display. Do official observers ever get involved in these cases ? Seems that friendly pink

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Danny Douglas
Hmmm odd that. Reminds me of going to work one morning and finding that some dummy had changed all the ZULU clock due to daylight savings time. My windows 2000 units did NOT change time this morning. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all DX 2-6 years

[digitalradio] Re: Busy detector

2007-03-11 Thread Dave Bernstein
No, it's actually trivial: 1. The PMBO's tranceiver's audio output is currently connected to the Pactor Modem's audio input; add a connection to the soundcard input (this might require adding a soundcard if one isn't already present in the PC that hosts the PMBO server software) 2. The SCAMP

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Bad PSK signals linears

2007-03-11 Thread Walt DuBose
If I am receiving a psk31 signal at a -12 dB SNR and I can amplify the signal by 9 dBm that would make the SNR at -3 dB. If psk31 can't decode the signal then, I would suspect that there is a problem with psk31 or the receive or transmit software. A fade of 6 to 10 dB us not all that

[digitalradio] ANY HELP WITH LOCATING A 2S0765 CHIP IS APPRECIATED

2007-03-11 Thread Joe9H5JO
Hi There! Does anyone know where to get hold of one of these chips? They got 5 leads and act as a power switch. They are easy to find on the net' but are available only in bulk. Minimum order is for 250 chips or more. I only need a couple! If any of you find this in your neighbourhood store

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Walt DuBose
Andrew O'Brien wrote: Hmm, not really ham radio related but my atomic clock just leap forward an hour at 11.30PM Eastern Time (USA). Did WWV not have the patience to wait until the official date and time ? It changes at sometime after midnight UCT. Walt/K5YFW

[digitalradio] Re :bad PSK transmissions

2007-03-11 Thread Mel
Regarding the comments on poor quality PSK transmissions, rather than hoping there are observers, who on seeing such a terrible misdemeanour as a wide overdriven transmission,who will instantly issue a Pink Slip, why not contact the operator yourself? In days past, if a signal was rotten

Re: [digitalradio] Re :bad PSK transmissions

2007-03-11 Thread Danny Douglas
Problem is, its not yesterday. Todays generation isnt the same as what we are used to. Ive gone so far as making a contact with the offending station, and in the pursuit of making the QSO asked them to turn it down while I listened and reported. Some will do so, and leave it at the reported

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Bad PSK signals linears

2007-03-11 Thread rein
If I am receiving a psk31 signal at a -12 dB SNR and I can amplify the signal by 9 dBm that would make the SNR at -3 dB. If psk31 can't decode the signal then, I would suspect that there is a problem with psk31 or the receive or transmit soB ftware. A fade of 6 to 10 dB us not all that

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Busy detector

2007-03-11 Thread kv9u
There were some who were not that happy about the development attempt of SCAMP since they had such a large investment in their modems. But the owners wanted to come up with an alternative to the SCS modem. SCAMP was put on hold because the programmer did not have time to continue further

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

2007-03-11 Thread John Becker
I guess for the same reason that us ham's have been passing traffic going back to the very start of it. RTTY - CW - SSB - PACKET - AMTOR and PACTOR. I don't see a thing wrong with a ham that happens to be at sea (without internet or cell service) sending a message to ever how likes. Before one

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Busy frequency detector (process definition).

2007-03-11 Thread kv9u
Any kind of busy detection circuit will need to provide detection for the entire band of frequencies you are going to be transmitting in. In fact, this was one of my recommendations to the ARRL. It should not be as much of a problem as you have with Pactor since the mode will likely have one

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

2007-03-11 Thread John Becker
Well seems that I hosed that message up. Sorry list members. John

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread WB6BNE
Hello There, WWV has always gone by UTC. UTC has no Daylight Savings Time period. They have leap seconds once in awhile. 73 Gary WB6BNE - Original Message - From: Walt DuBose To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 11:09 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio]

[digitalradio] MODERATOR ACTION -- 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

2007-03-11 Thread John Becker
Last year for almost 5 week we went over this very same subject. Nothing has changed. Getting the same comments from the same list members. It's time the end this thread -again-. John, W0JAB so there !

[digitalradio] Re: Busy detector

2007-03-11 Thread jgorman01
I really don't know anything about the pmbo software. What you describe may be trivial from a system analysis standpoint but actually coding it may not be so easy. What you're describing is running a second process (SBD) and making the pmbo software communicate with that process. That may or

[digitalradio] Transmit signature

2007-03-11 Thread WB0QIR
Don't know where to really post this but here goes. Is there a program that will identify signals on 2m and will be able to pop up a call sign after you have matched a particular signal to a call sign?

[digitalradio] Re: Busy detector

2007-03-11 Thread Dave Bernstein
The PMBO server software is an an application, not an operating system running on bare hardware. Assuming the PC hosting this software runs Windows, Linux, or Unix, then hosting the SCAMP Busy Detector (SBD) as an independent process would definitely be trivial. 73, Dave, AA6YQ

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Les Warriner
Whoops. Yes, they do correct time for DST and standard time. My clocks, atomic clock controlled, changed at 1 AM EDT by gaining an hour. My UTC clock did not change - thankfully!!! At 04:45 PM 3/11/2007, you wrote: Hello There, WWV has always gone by UTC. UTC has no Daylight Savings Time

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Chuck Mayfield
Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time codes. There is absolutely no way for either station to 'know' in which time zone your atomic clock is located. So How could they correct time for DST??? Enlighten me please 73, Chuck/AA5J At 09:00 PM 3/11/2007, Les Warriner wrote: Whoops. Yes,

[digitalradio] Re: Busy detector

2007-03-11 Thread jgorman01
The process itself may be trivial, but communication between it and the pmbo application, may or may not be trivial. I don't even know if the SBD part of scamp was designed as a unique process that could be run independently or if it had inter-process communications designed into it. It may very

[digitalradio] Re: What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread jgorman01
My atomic clock changed right on time. I would have to look at the manual, but the clock itself may have the software for DST. However, WWV/B would have to put out a bit that says DST for the clock to have known to change. My clock does have time zone settings incorporated into the software. I

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Danny Douglas
Savings time starts or ends at the East Coast time (think it is 2:30 AM) so that means its 130 central, 12:30 Mountain and 11:30 in Pacific.The start is across the USA at the exact same instant. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all DX 2-6 years each

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Les Warriner
BUT: As I understand the explanation given by the National Bureau of Standards, there is more at Boulder than JUST WWV. This is the home of the Cesium Atom clock that controls time for us, both UTC and through some outstanding equipments in the station, local times through the now

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread dubose
The clocks don't change, in fact the clocks don't really read UTC their readout is something else...but the data signal they transmit on low frequency that the atomic clocks received is intrepreted by the clock to display the local time. My Network Clock reads 01:25 UTC but my display shows 10:25

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread N2QZ
Chuck Mayfield wrote: Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time codes. There is absolutely no way for either station to 'know' in which time zone your atomic clock is located. So How could they correct time for DST??? Enlighten me please The WWVB signals include indicator bits for

[digitalradio] Re: What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread Bill Ragsdale
There is a daylight saving bit in the data stream from WWV. It notifies your clock the shift is in effect. However the data stream continues on UTC time. Even though each time zone shifts at 2:00 AM local time WWV has to send one common signal to all. I can't find on their web site for which

Re: [digitalradio] Re: What's with Boulder?

2007-03-11 Thread John Gleichweit
I didn't get a signal at all, and none of the 3 WWVB clocks changed. Hopefully I'll get a signal tonight, and everything will be fixed. jgorman01 wrote: My atomic clock changed right on time. I would have to look at the manual, but the clock itself may have the software for DST. However,