Danny Douglas wrote:
I certainly have MY doubts that many hams would live the goodie life if
there were no regulations. Just take a look where there ARE regulations;
the US highways, and see how many Americans pay attention to the law. Yes,
the majority would try to do so, but the minority,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Australia's restrictions on methods of operating rather than modes
of
operating are frustrating though. No phone patches, IRLP only
recently etc. 73s,
Dave.
Dave, we can run phone patches here, that was
So using multimulticarrier soundmodem with a
YaeComWood + 1kW PA will
only heat your ham shack without other useful effect.
Negative.
The grounded-grid PA's have no negative effect on SNR if tuned right
(tuned for peak power). Those PA's have better lineariy than the 100W
push-pull
I was trying to do some RTTY QSOs last night, on 40, and everytime I found a
clear freq, started transmitting a CQ, some South American QRM on SSB came
up right on top of me. Tuning around I found at least a dozen Spanish QSOs
between 7.050 and 7.01. They are authorized there, and be damn if
You really had me going with the length of time it takes to get an STA.
Glad to hear it is of a more reasonable time. I do wish they would allow
longer STA testing periods, but I quite agree that since they will
likely allow any reasonable experiment, you are fairly safe in getting
the
Yes, Chris,
But that is only in the text data sub bands. The voice/image/fax areas
would allow it as long as it is a published protocol. Do you think that
it is unreasonable to have some kind of published protocol?
If it had the published protocol, would you be opposed to using it on
the HF
Danny wrote:
Less QRM from stateside
stations above 7.1, and to keep stateside stations from calling them. They
were NOT trying to DX, so any place above 7.1 would have worked (of course
avoiding short wave broadcast).
I don't know how many times on SSB , while having a chat with a friend, I
The cross-cultural part of this discussion reminded
me of a broadcast by the late Alistair Cooke. He had
just read a book by a U.S. lawyer, who asserted that
the thicket of regulations in the U.S. covering
every aspect of the law had begun with the Johnson
administration and the War on Poverty.
Beaconing at VFO 10137.5 (+1625 hz) , 30 seconds, mode 141A, 30M is the only
band open up here today
this at 1630Z...
John
VE5MU
I know that John, and its pretty sad. I had the same problem in Hong Kong when
I called DX. Japan thought they were DX, but I didnt even count the cards from
there, I just weighed them by the pound. Even here in Virginia, I can call CQ
DX and more than likely have at least one or two
I had always heard ( and believed) that our law here was patterned after
English Commo Law - until I lived in England for 6 plus years. No Way Jose.
Things were done totally different between the two, and then you throw in
the English Colony of Hong Kong, and it was even more confusing.
I got
HumDXing is the hobby of tuning in and identifying distant radio
signals, or making two way radio contact with distant stations in
amateur radio. The term DX gets its name the CW abbreviation DX, for
distance or distant.
Distant
1 a : separated in space : AWAY a mile distant b : situated
Danny Douglas N7DC wrote:
I was trying to do some RTTY QSOs last night,
...
some South American QRM on SSB came up right on top of me.
Tuning around I found at least a dozen Spanish QSOs
between 7.050 and 7.01.
... Now, I know the rest of the world HAS to use that portion
for SSB,
CQ County Hunters.
Dave wrote:
What is CQ CH? I'm used to seeing CQ WY, or CQ ID, or even CQ KL7, but
CH has me puzzled. Just heard it on PSK31 on 30 meters.
Tnx es 73
Dave
KB3MOW
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beaconing at VFO 10137.5 (+1625 hz) , 30 seconds, mode 141A, 30M is
the only band open up here today
this at 1630Z...
John
VE5MU
Hi John,
My ALE is running (including 10MHz) but it only scans the ALE
Hi John,
No problem; I would be happy to help work towards an STA for
RFSM2400, if that is indeed a worthy goal. Think part of the issue is
that due to our position in the sunspot cycle *usable* bandwidth for
experimentation, at least in the evenings in North America, is very
limited. Would
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
I would be happy to help work towards an STA for RFSM2400,
if that is indeed a worthy goal. Think part of the issue is
that due to our position in the sunspot cycle *usable*
bandwidth for experimentation, at least in the evenings
in North America, is very limited.
Thanks, Bonnie, for the answer you gave abt 40 meters. I learned a lot and
I agree.
Gilles ve2ft
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.15/728 - Release Date: 2007-03-20
08:07
attachment: Notebook.jpg
Go for it! Better to get started with the bureaucracy
and later withdraw the request than to wait and wait
for a solution from another direction only to lose time.
Spectrum availability on 80M in the evening will vary
depending on where you are located. There is heavy
local activity on 80M
OK. I'd be glad to helpif Bruce doesn't mind! (HI)
I haven't done a search yet. Does anyone have a copy of the protocol?
73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Here Here! Even back in the day when I ran RTTY on a HW-101 (really) people
on digital modes were more polite, less antagonistic, and in my humble
opinion, had better operating practices. CW came second, and phone a LONG
third.
Want to reinforce this? Listen to the loonies on 75 Phone, 14.275,
Found this, but there not much activity yet...
http://www.eham.net/forums/Digital/3369
Original Message Follows
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re:
I can do a sked :)
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Serocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
{snipped}
TRY to find someone on any rant on a digital mode.
{end snip}
Bill,
Well, I was not planning to go for an STA. I don't think it is needed
IMHO, publication and an ARRL legal review will be sufficient.
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
In a message dated 3/20/2007 7:00:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] writes:
IAFC MEMBER ALERT: FOR IMMEDIATE REVIEW
Contact: IAFC Communications Department
www.iafc.org
Common Fireground Noise May Cause
Unintelligibility of Digital Radio Transmissions
Fairfax, Va., Mar.
Bonnie,
I wasn't going to go after an STA, just an ARRL legal review.
John
Hi John,
That may be premature, because the RFSM is still under development,
going through changes as we speak.
The MIL STD 188-110 standard and FS-1052 that RFSM uses, is printed by
the US Govt, for general
Roger! I will await your posting on HFLINK.
Original Message Follows
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Getting RFSM2400 Approved for US Hams
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:28:10 -
I would say it depends a lot on the ops and the bands. On 6, a common HF
distance becomes DX, and on 2 meters, Puerto Rico, Baltimore, or even,
Grand Cayman is DX. YMMV
Jose, CO2JA
-
DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote:
HumDXing is the hobby of tuning in and identifying
Here in Cuba we do not have those freebanders, but sometimes I can
hear them on 7000, 1, and even 14103 yesterday, with quite coarse
language.
Here in Havana we get quite strong QRM from the european broadcasters
starting on 7105 since a bit earlier of sunset until sunrise in Europe,
29 matches
Mail list logo
