There are still bandwidth restrictions in the VHF and UHF bands.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 23:14 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
But content has nothing to do
I think this is a good idea Bonnie.
Get on 20 meters with a few hundered of your wide band
digital users on field day and demand they not
interfere with your group ...
It will make for a interesting test case.
your comment
I will be happy to provide a examples of how the
rules allow
Interesting dilemma. We love uncrowded bands but if they're too uncrowded they
might be considered under-utilized and be in danger of being taken away from us.
Dave
AF6AS
-Original Message-
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *guarantee* you that following the third or fourth
angry call to Riley Hollingsworth you'd receive one
from him demanding that you cease and desist.
Go ahead, make his day.
He has publically stated that hifi voice
Go for it but make shore all of you ID in CW so your
calles can be noted by the stations who will complain
...
--- bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a good idea Bonnie.
Get on 20 meters with a few hundered of your wide
band
digital users on field day and demand they
Hi,
Well with and JT65/JT6M/FSK441 modes you will not see a qso as
such...that you see shorthand messages like RO and OOO says your
setup is ok...these modes are not qso modes...it is for exchange of
calls, location and report and little more. You should see calls and
grid locations on the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go for it but make shore all of you ID in CW so your
calles can be noted by the stations who will complain
...
There is no FCC requirement for CW ID on Digital Voice.
Bonnie KQ6XA
Theres the second mistake the FCC made.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to try some of the DRM-based modes which allow you to send
voice, pictures, and text.
I suppose I could do thos on 160m, now that I think of it.
73,
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Wed, 2 May 2007 7:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is true that others are not being held back, what actual new
Good operating practice is to always ID in the mode!
Even in ATV...hold up a QSL card in front of the camera.
Original Message Follows
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No
also, i am listening to this frequency as well, so try a connect to VE5MU also
After all the claims of how we are somehow being held back from new
technologies, it is interesting that there is nothing but silence from
the folks who claim so many others can do all these new things that we
supposedly can not here in the U.S. I am hopeful we have some honesty
about this in
WinDRM and HamDRM are good examples of modes where all functions shoud be legal
in the image/phone segments in the U.S. but sending a text file in most HF
image/phone segments is dissallowed by current rules. The crazy thing is that
you can render the text as glyphs and send it as an image but
Rick, KV9U wrote:
As one who has probably had the most classes in my area to bring in new
hams over several decades, there is no question that the new entrants
tend to not be near as motivated as we once had. That is because it
brings in a larger number of those who have more of a
14 matches
Mail list logo
