To be able to provide the remarkable number of modes in MultiPSK *and* have
a UI conforming to the Windows usability guidelines is verging on the
impossible, especially once you factor in supporting users and maintaining
websites.
IMO the user community should be very grateful to Patrick for
To do everything users want could easily take several years at 60 hours a
week plus the associated costs which are not inconsiderable.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To provide the ultimate software would require a team of three or four
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
IMO the user community should be very grateful to Patrick
No doubt. There's no complaint in providing the service, as each
programmer has given many of us new things to try, and the ability to
work with what we
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main reason for using Multipsk for me now has been the
superb FAE 400 mode.
Thanks for that Rick. I've never use FAE 400 (or any other ARQ, ALE
type modes.) I haven't found much local interest in experimenting
with the
User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared with
an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a
'certain age'.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
qu'est-ce que UI?
qu'est-ce que UI?
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Brown
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:00 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK
To be able to provide the
ahh I am of that certain age but UI could also apply to me as
(u)n(i)tiated hi hi
tnx Simon
John
VE5MU
User Interface, also known as GUI (Graphical User Interface) when compared
with an old VT-100 type terminal interface or even a teletype for those of a
'certain age'.
Simon
Tooner wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... but what it does and how it does.
... And certainly MultiPSK does its stuff WELL
... as a peek at its specs will show you.
How about telling us what that 'stuff' is, as you are more familiar
Any big fans of MULTIPSK that might like offer why they use it? I'm
guessing you're using it for the ALE applications?
I have made the test of running multipsk in parallel with winpsk and
other psk31 software. The programs were set up to decode the same
signals on 40m. Then i did compare the
Hello Frank,
Windows - No Disk Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters
Did you have this problem at the second starting? Or is it permanent each time
you start it?
but still kinda clunky and cluttered.
You see it cluttered, I see it in perfect order. Here is the way I see things:
Hello Paul,
Would you please outline the best way to update Multipsk. I don't do
it very often and where the files go gets confusing. For example, do
After starting the program Instal:
* if you have the 4.6 version, click on Updating... targetting the previous
Multipsk folder,
* if you have no
Hi Frank,
The reason that many of us use Multipsk is because it really is the only
available program of its kind. No other program has all those modes
available in one program at any price. In addition, some of the modes
are specific to Multipsk and not available anywhere else. So if you want
Hello Frank and all,
I don't think Multipsk deserves all these mails.
However thanks to all who present, in a better way that I could do it, this
program.
Here's a screenshot of what I get to stare at for hours on end:
http://evokefrank.googlepages.com/psk31qso
Notice the full screen waterfall
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Frank,
Windows - No Disk Exception Processing Message 0xc013 Parameters
Did you have this problem at the second starting? Or is it permanent
each time you start it?
Every time I start it.
f
There are bridges that allow direct logging from MixW and DM780 to
DXKeeper. MultiPSK interoperates directly with DXLab without the need
for a bridge application, and works with SpotCollector as well as
with DXKeeper and Commander.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Hi Patrick
I think the GUI is great . I have no trouble using it. Keep up the good
work !
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Patrick Lindecker skrev:
Hello Frank and all,
I don't think Multipsk deserves all these mails.
However thanks to all who present, in a better way that I could do it,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Frank and all,
I don't think Multipsk deserves all these mails.
Hi Patrick,
I find the GUI in MULTIPSK the best of all. It looks like a DIGITAL
MODEM and I can go to any mode I want with a single click. I
Hi Patrick,
I agree. You do an awesome job. Thank you so much for your hard work on our
behalf!
73
Al WB2JEP
-- Original message --
From: Demetre Valaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Frank
Thanks for your comments Dimitry as they do help with understanding your
approach.
One thing that I wondered about when using the program for our test was
the relatively slow speed at the ~ +5 dB S/N. The 600 showed on the
screen which now if I understand your comments below, the slowest bps
Frank,
I will see if I can find this on a Vista computer.
One other solution would be to see what happens with a test program (with a lot
of flags).
If you are interested, PSE send me a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Tooner
To:
All,
I was able to track down the general location of an RFI problem I've
been hearing since December. It's in the vicinity of 3 new homes on a
cul-de-sac not far from my QTH. I'm told the pulse noise sounds like the
RFI from an invisible electric fence.
At this point, it's hard to tell which
Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!!
73 Les
At 02:05 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote:
Frank,
I will see if I can find this on a Vista computer.
One other solution would be to see what happens with a test program
(with a lot of flags).
If you are interested,
Here's a quick-n-dirty home video of some of the features of Digital
Master 780:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7731131773805023264
-
To answer that in one word, no.
Ain't going to happen.
The reason so so many use the sound card modes right now
is because they don't have to *buy* some black box to do it.
John, W0JAB
Thanks John,
That answer is no help. I understand the economics of it, but black
boxes are more
I think you can also go up in frequency towards the VHF frequencies
as the RFI gets stronger , that will help attenuate a little.
On Jan 31, 2008 5:03 PM, Rud Merriam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your ultimate recourse is to the FCC if any RFI is being generated. They
will send letters
would the following be something along those lines
http://www.qualcomm.com/technology/assetmanagement/platforms/globaltracs.html?_kk=equipment%20tracking_kt=dbb97098-5e4d-4b93-95ae-42727fd9835c
http://www.qualcomm.com/press/releases/2008/080110_Qualcomm_Introduces_GlobalTracs_Lite.html
i work
I began using MultiPSK a few months ago when Sholto was looking for
help with some propagation monitoring on 30 meters. He has a program
that works in conjunction with MultiPSK to automatically post spots on
http://www.projectsandparts.com/30m/. Prior to trying and
registering MultiPSK I had
check out http://www.aprs.net/vm/DOS/COMMERCL.HTM
I did a google search and did not go to the site.
73
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
I work for our local County as their Radio Tech and our Road
Department would like to be able to keep tabs on
I go between MultiPSK and DM780. What is the best/easiest way to
create a combined/common log?
Thanks,
Dave
W6DLF
Nice post Jose.
I must also add that the algorithms written by Patrick are some of the
most sophisticated I have ever seen for software based audio decoding.
His A1A decoder is one of the best I have ever used.
--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
On Jan 31, 2008 6:59 PM, Les Warriner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!!
Les, the main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR:
http://multipsk.eqth.info/index.html (click on United States Download
Site #1).
--
JT Croteau, N1ESE -
Touche!! Patrick. I enjoy using your program.
Rick W3BI
- Original Message
From: Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:00:03 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK
Hello Frank and all,
I
Hi All,
Am fairly new to ham radio and I read a lot about the different apps
for different modes and particularly the multi-function apps like HRD
and MixW (for which I have a license) and it's all pretty daunting.
I'm wondering if anyone has done a comparison of features of the
different
Thanks Much!!!
At 04:45 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 6:59 PM, Les Warriner
mailto:leswa7ham%40earthlink.net[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!!
Les, the main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR:
Rod:
Here's the flagship tracking product for truck fleets, from Qualcomm
(the folks who also make the CDMA chips for your celel phone):
http://www.qualcomm.com/technology/assetmanagement/platforms/omnitracs.html
Phil
AF6AV
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have power lines running underground and a transformer box near one of
the three houses?
How about a watersoftner in one of the houses.
Also look for INternet monitoring of electrical power loops (meters), light
poles...even if they are off during the day their keep-alive/on-off circuit
Has anyone here ever received a respose from the FCC to a legal question? They
might have a policy of not answering. There could be two problems. One would be
that it creates a body of unpublished information that makes prosecution of
offenders more difficult. The other could be that only
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Warriner leswa7ham@ wrote:
Thanks Much!!!
Wow! all these 4.7 Multipsk posts after I asked my question - and no
answer. So I'll try again.
Paul, I believe message #26409 answered
Hello Rick.
As regards the speed that is slower 600 in MIL-STD 188-110A/B.
There are 300, 150, 75. In my opinion speed reduction has been
made nonoptimal, using dumb repetition of data in 300 and 150 is
not needed.
The theory of coding says that repetition is the worst way to
improve
39 matches
Mail list logo
