AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, WD8ARZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As usual Rick you take comments and twist them to take off on a
tangent and make personal put downs.
I didn't recall anything like this in Rick's recent posts, so I
went back and reviewed them -- and
Dave, enjoy your software and respect that effort very much. Really
surprised to find your comments that continue the mis-direction from the
original email.
It is obvious in my original message that no twists or personal comments
were directed at anyone, that there is no intent to counter new
A reasonable person would respond properly by stating what it is they
specifically disagree with and then offer their solutions. He did not
do this because ... he can not ... and must result to personal attack.
Everything that I have said is not only true, to the best of my
knowledge, but can
I have not heard of anyone doing this, but it sounds like it could be an
improvement. Is anyone on the group experimenting with such proposals?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote:
Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote:
Phil's paper is from many years ago but the reality is that there was no
The KN4LF Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast
#2008-28 has been published on Friday 08/08/2008 at 1500 UTC, valid UTC
Saturday 08/09/2008 through 2359 UTC Friday 08/15/2008 at
http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf6.htm .
73 God Bless,
Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF
Lakeland, FL,
Hi Matthew
This is from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
garylinnrobinson wrote:
Dave,
This is exciting news - especially the Windows version and the Thor
mode. One question though. MltiPSK has DominoEX and has a FEC button
on it that enables FEC in the DominoEX modes. Is THOR the same as or
Very well deserved , Congratulations Dave.
Andy K3UK
-- Forwarded message --
From: Warren Rothberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:21 PM
Subject: [dxlab] AA6YQ Recognition
To: Dxlab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the ARRL Letter Vol. 27, No. 31 - August 8, 2008
*
I strongly concur with Andy and the ARRL. I can personally attest that
Dave has been one of the most helpful software authors and will help you
no matter how dumb the question may be to some. He provides support
for his program suite that is simply outstanding and even beyond what
you might
Yes - well deserved, especially for figuring out how to use LoTW !
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
From: Andrew O'Brien
Very well deserved , Congratulations Dave.
Andy K3UK
Congratulations Dave for this very deserved award and to permit other softs to
interface and use this suite of programs through this old but gold link: the
DDE one.
73
Patrick (F6CTE)
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown
To: DIGITALRADIO
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 9:13
Several modems on that link claim fx.25 compatibility; TNC-X comes to
mind, but they all seem to have been developed for VHF/UHF use, so YMMV
on HF.
Chuck AA5J
Rick W. wrote:
I have not heard of anyone doing this, but it sounds like it could be an
improvement. Is anyone on the group
Thanks, guys, I appreciate it!
Simon, interoperating with LotW requires only the ability to drive TQSL via
a command line interface and perform uploads via RFC1867. See
http://www.arrl.org/lotw/developer/tqsl-cmdline.html
and
http://www.arrl.org/lotw/developer/uploads.html
and feel free to
As I said, Bill, I reviewed the thread and saw no signs of enmity, twisted
spins, misdirection, or anything else remotely nefarious. Rick was simply
pointing out that there's a pretty big hole, and that SCAMP demonstrated
years ago that this hole could be filled.
With respect to your point that
As I understood in a quick reading, this is aiming at keeping the modem
and adding intelligent redundancy, specially for beacons and telemetry.
The older equipment just receives some more harmless digital rubbish,
and could even receive the same packets with no improvements.
Interesting,
*MMMonVHF and DUBUS 144 MHz Meteorscatter-Sprint Contest 2008 (World Wide)*
The VHF-DX-Portal MMMonVHF (http://www.MMMonVHF.de) in cooperation with the
magazines DUBUS
and Funk-Telegramm (by Joachim, DL8HCZ) invite you to take part in our new
144 MHz Meteorscatter Sprint Contest,
which will take
Chuck,
Would you point me to the claims for fx.25 TNC compatibility? I do not see
any specific TNCs mentioned.
I am real curious about this because 2 years or so I looked at doing some
experiments with modified protocols using existing TNCs. All of them
insisted, even in KISS mode, that the
16 matches
Mail list logo
