as
the newly required digital BPL busting technologies are too expensive
to play with, don't we all lose?
/not_so_tongue_in_cheek
Erik KI4HMS/7
Jose A. Amador wrote:
kd4e wrote:
(text snipped)
As you noted, if we boost the power level of the transmission we
enhance the probability
jgorman01 wrote:
I may be wrong but I beleive your theory doesn't assume that the RF
energy at your reciever's antenna is not additive. In other words,
the signal from the transmitter you want to hear and the interfering
signal do not add together.
Do you mean that superposition theorem
Bill Turner wrote:
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:18:04 -0400, Jose A. Amador
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:amador%40electrica.cujae.edu.cu wrote:
I would strip the Win prefix and use, say, Ham, and create HamDRM
as mode designator
REPLY FOLLOWS
Bill Turner wrote:
I personally have no objections to WinDRM, but I know Microsoft is
fanatical about the use of Windows or anything close to it. As you
may recall, LogWindows was forced to change its name, as was Lindows,
the Linux distro.
DRM is used by Microsoft extensively to mean
Dave Bernstein wrote:
So my longwinded answer to your question, Bill, is the human operator
is at fault, as he or she is ignoring the band plan.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
Seems reasonable when explained that way.
While it is not a problem for people with modern radios
and well calibrated
If the beacons are moved, I am not sure where they would receive less QRM,
if on the low end contending with CW DX or in the high end contending
with the
family radiotelephones
Something elseOO's only have jurisdiction within the US...the world
is wider.
So, a well thought solution is
Dave Bernstein wrote:
PSK -- which many posters here have asserted is the most popular sound
card mode -- can be used in either LSB or USB at the operator's
discretion.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
Packet and Pactor (I, II) are also sideband independent due to the
pulse coding used with
jgorman01 wrote:
Ok, folks, surely there are several of you who know what your rigs
design is. What do some of the newer, higher priced and lower priced
rigs use in their audio chains for amps and preamps? Do they have
sophisticated feedback networks to equalize the amplitudes over the
jgorman01 wrote:
Just a quick example. In order to achieve a flat passband of 3 kHz
you may really need an amplifier whose bandwidth is 10 or even 20
kHz. To achieve this, you probably can't use just one single stage of
audio amplification with a simple emitter bypass electrolytic
301 - 309 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
