I'm looking for test same contact.
73 de Aldo - IW7DGY
The latest version of rfsm8000 now has the option of sending email in plain
text. Now, rfsm8000 can send emails to winlink.
Apparently winlink has a problem reading //WL2K and //MARS from an email
subject that is MIME encoded.
Howard
Hi all!
Are there CoA frequencies with RFSM8000 between individuals or
dedicated frequencies with automatic stations or servers or gates with
RFSM8000 modulation?
We have done some good tests regionally here and would like to connect
stations mostly in europe for EmComm tests.
73 de Wolf,
John
VE5MU
Do70QK
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Wolf, oe7ftj
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 10:08 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM8000 qrg's?
Hi all!
Are there CoA frequencies with RFSM8000
Hi Wolf,
Be sure to keep us informed as to your results.
It is ironic that we can not use MIL-STD-188-110A type modulation here
in the U.S. HF ham bands, at least not in the text RTTY/Data areas, with
the requirement to keep the baud rate of any one tone no faster than 300
baud. The RFSM
There is a relatively new version of RFSM8000 #535
In the email server mode - email would go out on the internet to
someone's personal or bussiness email without a FROM address. Thus
how to reply was difficult or non obvious.
This is now fixed. The FROM address is now the email address the
On Saturday 19 April 2008 12:19:55 am Leskep wrote:
Hi Alan
This is using the digi port on the 857 with all dsp functions off
but I need 2400 hz of audio passband just to fit the non standard
RFSM8000 signal in and just cant get it from stock standard 857
Maybe just put it back in my mobile
- Original Message -
From: Leskep
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000 and Yaesu FT857
Hi Skip
The problem is that I need to pass around 2.4 khz of signal audio
and with the stock filter it will not do
Greetings to all
Is anyone using the FT857 for RFSM8000
I have been trying mine out over the past two days after getting a
new Signalink USB interface
Big problem with the RX passband - it is not wide enough using
the standard filter supplied with the FT857 and consequently too
much of the
. The best around here seem to be the little green
ones from Radio Shack.
73, Skip KH6TY
- Original Message -
From: Leskep
To: Digitalradio
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:08 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM8000 and Yaesu FT857
Greetings to all
Is anyone using the FT857
Hello,
You should be using the digi port, and there is a specific setting that
allows you to center the filter passband around typical digi signals. I
find 200 hz up works best for ALE.
Since the signal is now centered, I can then even use the DSP bandpass
to really tighten up.
If you have
the
necessary frequency response. The best around here seem to be the little green
ones from Radio Shack.
73, Skip KH6TY
- Original Message -
From: Leskep
To: Digitalradio
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:08 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM8000 and Yaesu FT857
Greetings to all
the FT920 works well on RFSM
Regards
Les
From: Alan Barrow
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 1:55 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000 and Yaesu FT857
Hello,
You should be using the digi port, and there is a specific setting that
allows you to center
VE5GPM has moved to 40M , 7089.0 USB for further testing , and will be
running either RFSM8000, non-standard modulation, or
ALE400.
Station is on 24/7 so please try a connect
John
VE5MU
Normally, when I am operating digital modes, I start out with the full
3.6 kHz bandwidth and only tighten it up when I need to. The non
standard mode is likely a much better fit for some rigs. In fact, it
would seem that some rigs, even some newer ones, would not be able to
operate some of the
Still testing RFSM8000 , VE5MU on 7135 USB, email server address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , VE5GPM on 14103.0 USB, email server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both stations running non-standard modulation, and will be operating from
1800Z today to 1800Z tomorrow.
Both stations will switch to ALE400 for a 24
Hi John,
Using RFSM 2400, I was able to connect with the non standard mode, but
had to go to 50 watts, and initially showed a 5 dB S/N connection, but
nothing would go through. There is a beep tone at the beginning of each
transmission and I see a large spike on the spectrum display which I
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 1:44 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Hi John,
Using RFSM 2400, I was able to connect with the non standard mode, but
had to go to 50 watts, and initially
I have been monitoring the frequency all afternoon, but there is SWBC of
course and getting stronger as the evening approaches. Tried one more
time, and it did indicate a connect, but then disconnected after a few
attempts.
The large file I was attempting to send was not so much to send the
Rick de Les
From: Rick
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:44 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Hi John,
Using RFSM 2400, I was able to connect with the non standard mode, but
had to go to 50 watts, and initially showed a 5 dB S/N connection
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
I have been monitoring the frequency all afternoon, but there is SWBC of
course and getting stronger as the evening approaches. Tried one more
time, and it did indicate a connect, but then disconnected after a few
attempts
in the server Setup - every X minutes
See using e-mail.txt in the README folder in RFSM8000
Hope that explains it enough for you
Regards
Les VK2DSG
From: Howard Brown
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 3:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM8000 Mail Server
Can anyone
VE5GPM beaconing on 14103.0 Mil Std Modulation, interval 60 seconds
beacon started at 1630Z . please try a connect, or signal reports to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , put VE5MU as the first word in the subject
line.
Thanks
John
VE5MU
-IDE Group along with a group of other VK amateurs - and enjoyed
the testing also
Regards
Les VK2DSG
From: Rick
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:04 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Hi John,
Can you tell us anything about how this technology is working
Hi,
I am sending short RFSM8000 beacons right now on 14,109.5 KHZ carrier
frequency. Anyone interested?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
No sign here Demetre.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Hi,
I am sending short RFSM8000 beacons right now on 14,109.5 KHZ carrier
frequency. Anyone interested?
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Starting at 00:00 Z Friday, VE5GPM will be on 14103.0 , running RFSM 8000 ,
non-standard modulation, FTP enabled, but currently
no email server running. Station is in DO70QK, located in an emergency
operations centre.
This station should remain operational all weekend, beam antenna is pointed
at 20:00Z
Beaconing 14103.0 RFSM8000, non-standard modulation , 60sec intervals, for
the next 2 hours
John
VE5MU
Cool , I will listen for you , but I don't expect anything . The band
seem to be
dead here in Norway now.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
John Bradley skrev:
at 20:00Z
Beaconing 14103.0 RFSM8000, non-standard modulation , 60sec intervals,
for the next 2 hours
John
VE5MU
Hi John,
Can you tell us anything about how this technology is working out? From
what I can see from the web site, it replaces and is backward compatible
to RFSM2400.
Although we can not use it here in the U.S. on the frequency you
selected, it could be used to send images in the phone/image
John,
If this modulation is the MIL-STD/FED-STD/STANAG 8PSK waveforms,
wouldn't they be at 2400 baud at all times? We can not use baud rates
over 300 here in the U.S. on the text digital portions of the bands, but
they could possibly be used in the voice/image portions for sending
images/fax.
Per, sm0rwo
- Original Message
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2007 3:36:08 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
John,
If this modulation is the MIL-STD/FED- STD/STANAG 8PSK waveforms,
wouldn't
As of 20:00UTC beaconing every 5 minutes 14109.5 non-standard . This will
last until 21:30 UTC
After that will be monitoring 14109.5 so if the band smartens up, try a
connect
John
VE5MU
:08:09 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Howard;
That might be my fault that you couldn’t decode using
2400. Will double check and try again Wed afternoon.
Same frequency, but will make sure I am on the right modulation,
non-standard
some promise.
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brown
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 2:52 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
John, thanks for the consideration today. I have been and
am
Beaconing 14109.5 starting 1530Z , ending 1700Z, 10 minute intervals,
RFSM8000, 500/600 long
John
VE5MU
, 2007 10:36:15 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Beaconing 14109.5 starting 1530Z , ending 1700Z, 10 minute
intervals, RFSM8000, 500/600 long
John
VE5MU
!--
#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 10:36:15 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Hi Howard
RFSM8000 is backward compatable with RFSM2400 and
providing you have the modulation set correctly to
non-standard .3 to 2.7 khz you should decode the
Beacon packets - check to see if the signal has a
TX
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brown
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:12 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Hearing good RFSM signals in North Texas this morning. Not able to
decode beacons with the older
Oh, and will be sitting there all day in this mode, starting at 0400Z today,
so you might want to try a connect
jb
From: John Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:08 PM
To: 'digitalradio@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] RFSM8000
Howard
Hi Rick
Well so far with the testing we are doing on RFSM8000
it appears to work very well -
below are some transfer figures from the program
using the Non-standard mode .3 to .2.7 khz wide application
band in not all that good of condition - freq 10137 usb path distance
approx 1000 plus klm
Hi all,
It was a lot of RFSM2400 activity on 3588 kHz in Europe yesterday.
73 de Steinar LA5VNA
Les Keppie skrev:
Hi Rick
Well so far with the testing we are doing on RFSM8000
it appears to work very well -
below are some transfer figures from the program
using the Non-standard mode
Hi All
Maybe some of you Digital Data movers would
like to look here
Les
http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru/
Les,
What do you see as the advantages of RFSM2400 over the 8PSK2400 baud
STANAG modems that we have been talking about recently (along with
RFMS2400)?
The only comment that I have heard so far is that it requires a good
signal to work. Athough hams can not use these modes here in the U.S. on
44 matches
Mail list logo
