Is it the band or the mode ? ? ?
It seems to me in my 35 years as a ham that 80 and 160
are at it's best this time of year.
John, W0JAB
At 09:51 PM 2/13/2007, you wrote:
Hi Bill,
Yes, busy night tonight on 160:)
The question I wanted to ask the group was whether they have found on
the lower
domino EX , on multipsk. sorry if I mis-lead you Ozhan
John
- Original Message -
From: ozhan onder
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:15 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
Hello John,
What is DEX John?,a new digi mode
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
I hope you or someone is making a list of which modes work the best
on each band and in varying conditions
This harks back to my recent comment on Olivia - how one night I was
getting solid
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jhaynesatalumni
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:50 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
I hope you
I have not used Moe's simulator yet. It takes my second PC that is not
working now.
Could you tell people like me which are those variables available on
Moe's simulator besides gaussian noise ?
So far I have only seen reports on gaussian noise using Moe's simulator.
And agreed. Working in
I am afraid that you can only reach a determination on SOME of the data
gathered with ionospheric data archives.
I think that Walt's proposal is a very good idea, but only part of it
will have verifiable path conditions. Nevertheless, you have to walk the
tunnel to get to see the light at the
several thousand QSOs for each mode on each
band.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jose A. Amador
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:47 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
, 2007 1:58 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
I have not used Moe's simulator yet. It takes my second PC that is not
working now.
Could you tell people like me which are those variables available on
Moe's simulator besides gaussian noise ?
So far I
sure of
it...
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Jose A. Amador
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
I am afraid that you can only reach a determination on SOME of the data
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:44 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
Well can only relate my impressions; hope others chime in
I think even though DominoEX halves the speed when FEC in engaged, it
is well worth the speed trade-off. 160/80
Hi Rick,
Just FYI; you and Dave (K3GAU) were solid copy on DoiminoEX on 160
tonight despite me using my 80 meter antenna. Actually seemed best
using 22 baud with FEC...one or two static crash hits, but overall
impressive considering my antenna limitations on 160 meters.
73
Bill N9DSJ
---
Well can only relate my impressions; hope others chime in
I think even though DominoEX halves the speed when FEC in engaged, it
is well worth the speed trade-off. 160/80 seems to vary night to
night in this regard; probably due to qrn and multipath. It also
depends on one's
With respect to MT63 , I have used it extensively in the past and found it
wanting, especially trying to tune a weak signal under less than
optimum conditions, as the noise covered the audio up. Under side by side
tests it did not copy as well as Olivia (1000/32) . probably half as well
on
Hello John,
What is DEX John?,a new digi mode to play with?..Tell us a little
bit..
vy tnx.
73's de Özhan TA3BQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With respect to MT63 , I have used it extensively in the past and
found it wanting, especially trying to
14 matches
Mail list logo
