At 02:03 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote in part:
There was no good reason to distort the tests by
inserting the specialized hardware, I believe that
Pactor I will run on a sound card, only Pactor II
and III are dependent on rare proprietary hardware
with rare proprietary software run under a proprietary
Gee I have been doing it all wrong then.
My PACKET - AMTOR PACTOR station
runs on a Dell 200mhz system running
DOS 6.2 with YAPP (yet another packet program)
that cane out in 1985 or 86.
The SCS PTC-LLex pactor III TNC has not clue
what OS I am running.
John Becker wrote:
At 02:03 PM
John Becker wrote:
At 02:03 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote in part:
There was no good reason to distort the tests by
inserting the specialized hardware, I believe that
Pactor I will run on a sound card, only Pactor II
and III are dependent on rare proprietary hardware
with rare proprietary
John Becker wrote:
At 02:03 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote in part:
There was no good reason to distort the tests by inserting the
specialized hardware, I believe that Pactor I will run on a sound
card, only Pactor II and III are dependent on rare proprietary
hardware with rare proprietary
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Becker wrote:
At 02:03 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote in part:
There was no good reason to distort the tests by
inserting the specialized hardware, I believe that
Pactor I will run on a sound card, only Pactor II
and
Claiming that you need to use MS-Windows for Pactor is absolutely
false, and shows that you're just spewing your ignorance. I have no
idea why - maybe you have some agenda, and maybe you're just like to
talk about things regardless of your actual knowledge. But the record
needs to be set
It requires a SCS multimode box and a Pactor III license. OS can be
whatever
that communicates with the box. I have used MSDOS, Windows and Linux, so
the OS is not an issue. It is just communicating a DTE with a DCE. SCS
uses a
form of advanced host mode that requires a suitable program to
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short
range??? as in 300 mi or
Because the SCS modem works so well, and except for HAL, no other
manufacturers developed any competitive systems. Also, there has been
minimal interest from the programmers in the amateur radio
]
moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
- Original Message -
From: KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short
range??? as in 300 mi or
Because the SCS
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital Modes and NVIS (iow, short
range??? as in 300 mi or
Hi Danny,
Not the local phone company, but the cell phone system for the area and
long distance were disconnected due to the fiber cut. They have
Because a critical variable of the test was altered,
and only for a selected mode, the test is invalid.
If you are to compare the modes validly they *must*
be tested on essentially similar platforms.
There was no good reason to distort the tests by
inserting the specialized hardware, I believe
11 matches
Mail list logo
