Dave,
Using the WINMOR busy detector for Pactor sounds like a workable idea.
The WINMOR busy detector hasn't yet been integrated into other WL2K Pactor
Servers but it could be. The basic WINMOR TNC application (the virtual TNC)
has the function but would need to be integrated into the Pactor
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Rick Muething rmueth...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Dave,
Using the WINMOR busy detector for Pactor sounds like a workable idea.
The WINMOR busy detector hasn’t yet been integrated into other WL2K Pactor
Servers but it could be. The basic WINMOR TNC application (the
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Muething
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 7:11 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: 'Vic Poor'
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission
All,
I have been busy with WINMOR but do monitor the group and thought it might
add some balance to put forth some facts and observations.
1) The majority of WL2K users are not 30 day wonder hams on expensive
yachts. Marine mobile users are probably 20% of all registered WL2K users
...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Muething
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 8:30 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission protection
All,
I have been busy with WINMOR but do monitor the group and thought it might
add some balance to put forth
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
A quick fix for this entire mess is to suggest to those running automated
traffic stations to use the World Wide Web. The web is faster, less likely to
be affected by atmospheric changes, and remove a thorn in the side of
At 01:08 AM 4/9/2010, you wrote:
A quick fix for this entire mess is to suggest to those running automated
traffic stations to use the World Wide Web. The web is faster, less likely to
be affected by atmospheric changes, and remove a thorn in the side of many ham
radio operators.
Most of what
- Original Message -
From: kc4cop
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 2:08 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission protection
Your comments about Grandma's birthday indicates that you understand very
little concerning
Adding to Skip's remarks, I will point out it is considered almost an
indecency among the daily-position-report hams to mention 97.113(a)(5)
of the FCC rules, which states:
(a) No amateur station shall transmit:
...
(5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be
Dave
right now I dont have the time to plug the holes
in your comments.
But the bottom line is that they are ham's at see.
Would there be a problem if they only used SSB
and not data mode?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
A quick fix for this entire mess is to suggest to those running automated
traffic stations to use the World Wide Web. The web is faster, less
likely to be affected by atmospheric changes, and remove a thorn in the
narrow mode transmission
protection
Dave
right now I dont have the time to plug the holes
in your comments.
But the bottom line is that they are ham's at see.
Would there be a problem if they only used SSB
and not data mode
Using your same logic below, it could well be determined that hams who
partake regularly in 75M evening nets, or even regular QSO, etc, should take
their conversations to FCC Part D Citizen's band, or other service ,
because those communications on a regular basis could be easily
Ed G writes:
Using your same logic below, it could well be determined that hams
who partake regularly in 75M evening nets, or even regular QSO, etc,
should take their conversations to FCC Part D Citizen's band, or other
service , because those communications on a regular
Andy,
The issue for me has less to do with bandwidth than operating methodology. The
same problems exist independent of bandwidth; although wider bandwidth modes
certainly exasperate the situation. I agree that Winlink servers scanning
multiple frequencies is a poor use of limited frequency
15 matches
Mail list logo
