Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread John B. Stephensen
. Buffington To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 03:57 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA Do the recent FCC reg changes affect our ability to use 1Khz Olivia or SSTV? Are there any negative aspects to the changes

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread Joe Veldhuis
Wide SSTV isn't affected by this, it can still be run in the phone bands as it is now. The 500 Hz limitation keeps it out of the digital bands. Anyway, despite the majority interpretation, I still don't think that the new rules will in fact eliminate the ability to run 500 Hz digital text modes.

RE: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA The ARRL told me that any data transmission mode (defined as computer to computer file transfer) wider than 500 Hz would be prohibited on all HF bands if the rules changes go into effect. Image transmission

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread Danny Douglas
: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:53 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA The ARRL told me that any data transmission mode (defined as computer to computer file transfer)wider than 500 Hz would be prohibited on all HF bands if the rules changes go into effect

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread Danny Douglas
] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA SSTV is NOT digital so should not be affected. Danny Douglas N7DC Would DSSTV be affected? -- Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E ... somewhere in FL URL: bibleseven

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread John Bradley
For your info, this following is an excerpt from the Canadian regulations regarding bandwidth: to the best of my knowledge, there are no plans to change this. John VE5MU Printable Version RIC-2 - Standards for the Operation of Radio Stations in the Amateur Radio Service Schedule I -

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread KV9U
Since SSTV would be image, it can operate on the phone portions of the bands, whether digital or analog modulation. The same thing holds true with digital voice or analog voice since they are both phone and have equal status. At least the FCC has been clear on that. They also were clear on

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread John B. Stephensen
:53 UTC Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA If this is so, then Pactor III, MT631K and MT63-2K and I suppose several other wide PSK modes will not be permitted.Walt/K5YFW-Original Message-From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread John B. Stephensen
- From: Danny Douglas To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 17:52 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA I would think so, since it is digital- and if it is over 500 hz. but I dontknow that much about

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-31 Thread Danny Douglas
I hope none. CW ops, and PSK ops have little enough of their own bandwidth under the new rules, without having to go someplace else to be intefered with by wide modes. Here is a more significant issue: Just because you can do something, doesn't necessarily mean you should do it. How many of us

Re: [digitalradio] Recent regulation changes in USA

2006-10-30 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Do the recent FCC reg changes affect our ability to use 1Khz Olivia or SSTV? Are there any negative aspects to the changes that affect digital other than on 80M? Thanks, RJB. - -- Roger, W6VZV Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of