Re: [digitalradio] The Basics On WINMOR

2009-02-25 Thread Rick W
Hard to respond as you did not indicate what you found confusing. There is no question that WINMOR, if reasonably successful, will cause an increase use of Winlink 2000, maybe even more than they might prefer, HI. And it will also impact sales of SCS to a certain extent. As Patrick pointed

[digitalradio] The Basics On WINMOR

2009-02-24 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I am a member of the WINMOR reflector and I am encouraged by the author's intentions. However, since I have avoided Pactor and used thinks like AirMail and Winlink very little over the past couple of years, I am not sure just what the intended beta use of WINMOR will be. I have seen the

RE: [digitalradio] The Basics On WINMOR

2009-02-24 Thread David Little
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] The Basics On WINMOR I am a member of the WINMOR reflector and I am encouraged by the author's intentions. However, since I have avoided Pactor and used thinks like AirMail and Winlink very little over the past couple of years, I am not sure just

Re: [digitalradio] The Basics On WINMOR

2009-02-24 Thread Rick W
The beta and software being developed in the foreseeable future will be focused on Winlink 2000. It won't have a peer to peer function, unless it is temporarily put there as we had with the SCAMP protocol some years ago. Even then, they planned to remove PtoP once the software was made

Re: [digitalradio] The Basics On WINMOR

2009-02-24 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Rick I'm a bit confused over your long post. But I can say that he has said that it's not a replacement for P2 or P3 or ever will be. John